• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Samarco’s creditors rejects new plan on eve of meeting

Bondholders say that “in practice” the discount on the debt is 96.8%.

03/09/2022


On the eve of the general meeting of creditors, scheduled for Thursday, Samarco’s bondholders reacted against the new version of the judicial recovery plan, indicating that the result may be a bit further from what the mining company expected. In a document to the judicial recovery’s judge, funds such as Moneda, Golden Tree, Silver Point and Solus claim that the proposal brings “even more beneficial” conditions to parent companies BHP and Vale than the previous plan, which they had already questioned.

Eight months and 14 days have passed between the first and second draft of the plan, a period that the creditors argue was not used for effective negotiation. Instead, it was used only by Samarco in the drafting of the proposal. The company, in turn, has already indicated at previous times that there was resistance from creditors in negotiating the terms, in an attempt to impose a strategy on the company.

The company’s latest proposal says that unsecured credits will be paid in a single installment in 2041, taking into account a discount of 75% on face value and interest of 1% per year — inflation-adjusted only on credits in the Brazilian currency. In the creditors’ account (considering the almost 20-year grace period, the haircut, inflation and interests), what the company is proposing is that they accept the payment of the credits with a total discount, implicit and explicit, of 96.8%.

“The alternative to debt forgiveness is to force the creditors to become Samarco’s shareholders, without any political rights,” wrote the lawyers from the four law firms representing the bondholders. They also insist on maintaining the shareholders’ claims on the judicial recovery.

The group that objects the plan proposed by the company represents 82.5% of the judicial recovery claims, when excluding Samarco’s debt to BHP and Vale.

People close to the company argue that the extension of the debate on the judicial recovery case makes it difficult for Samarco to resume its focus on its operations and, consequently, its future ability to pay. The company’s legal administrators had scheduled the meeting to deliberate on the plan for February 23rd and, due to lack of quorum, rescheduled it for March 10.

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com
9 de March de 2022/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: general meeting of creditors, Samarco
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Preventive Law.
  • Brazil confirms first avian flu case on poultry farm
  • Marfrig and BRF merger creates R$152bn global food powerhouse
  • Lula’s vetoes on offshore wind bill face backlash in Congress
  • Brazil’s ethanol seeks bigger role in energy transition

Arquivos

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Banks raise inflation projection driven by Russia invasion AES Brasil bets on diversification to return to profit
Scroll to top