• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Brazil questions India’s decision to curb rice exports

Government of Narenda Modi said country had to mitigate rising prices of grain in domestic market

16/09/2022


Brazil and other countries questioned Thursday India’s decision to restrict or ban exports of the product. Several partners showed concern about food security after the announcement. India is the world’s largest rice exporter.

New Delhi announced last week a ban on exports of broken rice, a second-rate product used for animal feed. As it is a cheaper alternative, several countries, especially from Africa, buy it for human consumption. India also restricted exports of several types of the product, including white and brown rice, but excluded basmati rice from the measure.

India says it was forced to restrict exports to mitigate domestic price hikes driven by falling production – which reached the lowest level in recent times. India sells rice to more than 150 countries. Last year, the nation exported 21.5 million tonnes of grain, a volume that is greater than the sum of shipments of the other four largest exporters – Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan, and the United States.

At a regular meeting of the World Trade Organization Committee on Agriculture, several countries responded to India’s move. The U.S. and the European Union asked for an explanation and questioned why, so far, the Indian government has not even informed the WTO about the measure.

Brazil also mentioned the Indian restrictions and called on countries to go in the other direction by adopting measures that ease trade and give up trade-distorting policies. “This is essential to ensure growth, development, environmental protection, and food security around the world,” said a Brazilian representative.

Senegal, a major rice importer, made the toughest intervention. According to the country’s government, India’s decision threatens Senegal’s food security and also that of other countries, which have relied on trade with the Indians. It seems clear that several importers of broken rice will have no way to cover the 20% rise in costs.

The Indian representative said he didn’t understand why some countries complain when India gives subsidies for production and also complain when the country doesn’t export. The argument irritated some delegations.

The problem, as certain negotiators note, is that India distorts trade with huge subsidies, creates expectations in the market, then distorts it again by not delivering to several countries. China, the largest buyer of Indian broken rice, has kept quiet in the WTO discussion.

*By Assis Moreira — Geneva

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
16 de September de 2022/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: food security, India’s decision to curb rice exports
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Preventive Law.
  • Brazil confirms first avian flu case on poultry farm
  • Marfrig and BRF merger creates R$152bn global food powerhouse
  • Lula’s vetoes on offshore wind bill face backlash in Congress
  • Brazil’s ethanol seeks bigger role in energy transition

Arquivos

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Apollo commits $1.5bn to Embraer’s customers Analysis: Government’s upbeat projection includes GDP growth, falling inf...
Scroll to top