• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Brazil’s trade isolation exposed as tariffs reshape global markets

With few free trade deals, Brazil scrambles to boost competitiveness amid U.S. protectionism and shifting export routes

 

 

 

08/04/2025

Brazil’s limited network of free trade agreements is becoming a costly liability as President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff policies force a reordering of global trade. As exporters around the world seek alternatives to the U.S. market, Brazilian products face higher duties than competitors from countries with robust trade pacts.

Currently, just 13% of Brazilian exports are covered by trade agreements, compared to 60% in most other countries, according to Lucas Ferraz, head of the Global Business Center at FGV EESP and former secretary of foreign trade. “When a country has few trade deals, its products lose competitiveness in foreign markets because they’re subject to tariffs that others aren’t,” he said. “The entire world is being hit by Trump’s tariff bullying, and that puts us in an even tougher spot.”

While expanding trade agreements is not a quick fix, it’s becoming increasingly necessary, said former development minister Armando Monteiro. “This fallout with the U.S. and the post-Trump trade landscape will force Brazil to broaden its network of agreements and improve access to multiple markets,” he said. “It won’t be easy to reroute exports in the short term, but this is a long-term imperative.”

Among the most significant deals on the table is the long-awaited Mercosur–European Union agreement, which would create a market of 750 million consumers and raise the share of Brazil’s trade under agreements to 30% from 13%. The agreement was finalized last year, and the government anticipates signing it by the end of 2025.

A new variable emerged last week when the U.S. struck a deal with the EU. “We need more time to assess how this will impact the Mercosur agreement,” said Mr. Ferraz. “Agricultural resistance may increase, but pressure from European industry could push for a faster internalization of the deal.” Mr. Monteiro sees this internal balance tipping slightly in favor of moving the deal forward.

Mexico, Canada, and EFTA among Brazil’s top trade targets

Mexico is another priority. Although both countries are members of the Latin American Integration Association (ALADI), Brazil and Mexico have limited bilateral agreements—three in total, two covering the automotive sector and one economic cooperation pact. Minister of Development, Industry, Trade and Services, Geraldo Alckmin, is planning a trip to Mexico later this month to explore ways to expand the relationship, which has long been on the diplomatic agenda.

The Trump tariff shock may also help advance the Mercosur–EU deal and other pending agreements, including with Canada, Singapore, and EFTA (Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Iceland). Mr. Monteiro argued that Brazil should reconsider its commitment to negotiate only as part of Mercosur, a rule that has often hindered deal-making. Argentina’s new president, Javier Milei, has diverged from the bloc’s traditional positions, and Uruguay has long advocated for unilateral negotiations.

“If Brazil were no longer bound to Mercosur in trade talks, it could pursue agreements with countries also looking for new partners in light of the partial closure of the U.S. market,” Mr. Monteiro said. “Brazil needs to shift gears—use this moment of difficulty to reorient its trade policy and expand its bilateral agreements.”

Brazil’s advantages in such negotiations include the size of its domestic market and its diversified economy. The idea of ending the bloc-only negotiation clause has been debated for years, including during José Serra’s tenure as foreign minister under President Michel Temer. But under Workers’ Party governments, Mercosur has remained a pillar of Brazil’s foreign policy.

Mr. Monteiro believes today’s circumstances call for a more assertive stance. One of his chief concerns is the outcome of ongoing trade talks between the U.S. and China, which together account for 40% of Brazil’s exports. “If the Americans gain broader access to China’s food market, it would mean more competition for Brazil.”

Lack of trade deals also hinders investment and diversification

Mr. Ferraz warned that Brazil’s limited trade ties not only hurt exports but also deter foreign investment. “There’s growing evidence that countries with more trade agreements attract more investment—they’re better positioned to become export platforms to other key markets,” he said. “Those without access to major markets are left out of this new global chessboard, this reconfiguration of supply chains.”

He criticized Brazil’s historical reluctance to pursue trade deals, noting that the country’s engagement has fluctuated over time but never reached the level of urgency seen today.

Seeking new markets is now one of several measures Brazil is deploying in response to the 50% tariff hike Mr. Trump announced on July 30. Other steps mentioned by Mr. Alckmin and Finance Minister Fernando Haddad include a contingency plan to support affected companies, opening a negotiation channel with the Trump administration, and challenging the tariffs in U.S. courts and international forums.

Mr. Monteiro expects the contingency plan to follow the usual playbook: special credit lines, extensions on tax deadlines, and refinancing of export-related contracts (ACC). The government will likely require companies to retain jobs as a condition for support.

*By Lu Aiko Otta — Brasília

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

4 de August de 2025/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: Brazil’s trade isolation
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Brazil’s trade isolation exposed as tariffs reshape global markets
  • Latin America becomes battleground for U.S. airlines
  • China builds deeper roots in Brazil amid global realignment
  • NEWSLETTER – MURRAY ADVOGADOS JULY 2025
  • Brazilian industries calculate losses, seek new markets

Arquivos

  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Latin America becomes battleground for U.S. airlines
Scroll to top