• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Arbitrators exit Eldorado case, citing threats from J&F

The Batista brothers’ holding company and partner Paper Excellence have been in conflict in various courts since 2018

09/24/2024


Control of the pulp producer Eldorado, which has a plant in Três Lagoas, is at the center of a R$15 billion dispute that has lasted more than six years — Foto: Anna Carolina Negri/Valor
Control of the pulp producer Eldorado, which has a plant in Três Lagoas, is at the center of a R$15 billion dispute that has lasted more than six years — Foto: Anna Carolina Negri/Valor

The president of the arbitration tribunal overseeing the dispute between J&F Investimentos and Paper Excellence over control of the pulp producer Eldorado, along with another arbitrator, resigned on Monday (23). According to letters reviewed by Valor, Juan Fernández-Armesto, who chaired the arbitration, and Paulo Mota Pinto stated that their decision was prompted by “direct threats” from the Batista family’s holding company, which owns meat producer JBS. The news was initially reported by columnist Malu Gaspar in the newspaper “O Globo.”

J&F did not respond to requests for comment.

“Given the direct threat against me, I no longer feel capable of making the decisions I believe to be just and in accordance with the law. Therefore, I am resigning,” Mr. Armesto stated in a document dated September 23.

These resignations are not the first in the Eldorado case and come amid new developments in a battle that has been ongoing for over six years. The latest issue revolves around a case in the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region (TRF-4), which suspended the transfer of Eldorado shares to Paper more than a year ago.

While J&F claims that one of TRF-4’s decisions had already suspended the arbitration itself, Paper and the arbitration tribunal argue that only the transfer of controlling shares was suspended, along with the activities of the coordinating body established to balance decisions made at Eldorado. This is because Paper, which owns 49.41% of the pulp producer, has a minority stake on the board.

As a result, people familiar with the dispute said J&F had been asserting that the arbitration was violating a court ruling, risking legal penalties.

This clash of narratives was reflected in Itaú’s decision to withdraw from the dispute. The bank was the custodian of Paper’s funds for purchasing the shares of Eldorado still held by J&F, as well as the share book deposited in court by arbitration order. Itaú had sought clarification on the need to return the share book but ultimately ended the contract.

The partners were then given 60 days to find a new custodian, but no financial institution accepted the role. This deadline expired on September 16, and Itaú returned the share book to the company. According to people interviewed by Valor, J&F had sent notifications to these banks, indicating that acting as a depositary would constitute a breach of court ruling and a violation of the rights of both the holding and Eldorado.

Last week, the vice president of TRF-4, Judge João Batista Pinto Oliveira, ordered the suspension of the arbitration itself after a challenge from J&F. The president of the arbitration tribunal acknowledged this recent decision.

Judge Armesto said that the arbitration had always complied with judicial decisions, including those from TRF-4. For this reason, on September 20, he declared the arbitration suspended, following the second-instance judge’s position.

“While it is true that since the issuance of the partial ruling, J&F has adopted a confrontational approach with the Tribunal, this is the first time it has made such a brutal and ‘ad hominem’ threat, implying that I, as president, would be guilty of possible crimes of ‘malfeasance,’ ‘disobedience,’ or ‘abuse of authority,’” M. Armesto wrote.

Judge Mota Pinto, who joined the arbitration after Anderson Schreiber’s resignation—following accusations from J&F of omitting information that could indicate a conflict of interest—stated in his letter that the holding’s threats were directed not only at the presidency but at the entire tribunal.

“There are limits to the viability of establishing arbitration, which in this case have been largely exceeded concerning the president of the Arbitration Tribunal, regardless of the respect always due, asserted and practiced regarding the (better or worse) decisions of state courts,” he wrote.

“In any case, the threats directed at the Tribunal, along with the profound respect and full solidarity owed to the president…prevent me from continuing to serve as an arbitrator in this proceeding,” he added.

In a statement, Paper Excellence described the latest chapter in the dispute as “regrettable” and accused its partner of once again resorting to “criminal threats against some of the most renowned arbitrators worldwide, forcing their resignation.”

“This only confirms that J&F disregards contracts and the decisions against it, acting without the necessary seriousness and ethics in its business relationships,” it added, reiterating accusations that its partner uses “deceptive and dilatory procedural tactics to delay its inevitable defeat.”

J&F and Paper have been engaged in legal disputes across various courts since mid-2018, just before the Batista holding company annulled the purchase and sale contract for Eldorado, which was signed in September 2017. While Paper has won arbitration against its partner, it has yet to gain control of the pulp producer.

J&F is attempting to annul the arbitration ruling in a case currently proceeding in São Paulo’s judiciary. Furthermore, a TRF-4 decision has blocked the transfer of controlling shares based on legislation limiting land purchases by foreigners in the country for over a year.

*Por Stella Fontes — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
24 de September de 2024/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: Arbitrators exit Eldorado case, citing threats from J&F
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Brazil confirms first avian flu case on poultry farm
  • Marfrig and BRF merger creates R$152bn global food powerhouse
  • Lula’s vetoes on offshore wind bill face backlash in Congress
  • Brazil’s ethanol seeks bigger role in energy transition
  • Bosch taps Brazilian know-how as the world enters “Latin mode”

Arquivos

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Market distrust of fiscal policy grows as interest rate futures hit yearly ... Central Bank minutes signal faster tightening pace
Scroll to top