• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Ministry of Finance, Senate discuss safeguards for consumer tax reform rate cap

Negotiations underway to establish measures for limiting standard VAT rate to 26.5%

07/12/2024


Rodrigo Pacheco — Foto: Jefferson Rudy/Agência Senado

Rodrigo Pacheco — Foto: Jefferson Rudy/Agência Senado

Members of the Ministry of Finance and the Senate are already negotiating ways to ensure the effectiveness of the provision included in the consumer tax reform regulations to limit the standard rate to 26.5%. Under discussion is the creation of a program that establishes a hierarchy of measures that can be adopted to reduce the tax rate if it exceeds the maximum limit. Valor has learned the idea is to include this detail in the text of the bill as it goes through the Senate.

Supplementary Bill (PLP) 68, the main proposal for regulating consumer tax reform, was passed on Wednesday night in the Lower House. The lawmakers included in the bill text a measure to limit the standard rate to 26.5%, the sum of the Contribution on Goods and Services (CBS) and the Tax on Goods and Services (IBS).

The initiative came in the face of an increase in exceptions, intending to prevent them from raising the standard rate of the new Value Added Tax (VAT). However, parliamentarians, members of the government, and experts pondered that it was not clear enough how this measure would work in practice.

As a result, people close to the economic team have already contacted senators to establish a program that sets out responsibilities and a timetable for action. The first mechanism would be a command for the government to reduce the number of exceptions to general taxation. This would be followed by other measures such as linearly cutting exceptionalities and raising taxes on income to compensate for the consumption tax. Or a combination of these measures. The details are still being worked out.

In an initial survey, the idea was presented to the Senate leadership, whose president is Senator Rodrigo Pacheco. According to sources, the idea was well received. Negotiators have argued that the tax rate cap needs to be backed up by a set of measures that allow it to be complied with. It’s a logic similar to that of the fiscal framework, in which the fiscal target is supported by a “ladder” of restrictions on spending in the event of non-compliance.

In the suggestion put forward by the government, exceeding the 26.5% limit could itself be a trigger to set off the reviews of the tax reform’s exceptionalities, which will otherwise be carried out every five years.

This way, the measures to ensure the VAT rate does not exceed the stipulated level would be triggered automatically. The version approved in the Lower House only stipulates that, in the event of the cap being exceeded, the government will send a supplementary bill to revise the list of exceptions. However, it does not impose any kind of penalty if the bill is not approved, which makes it possible for the rule not to be complied with in practice.

This mechanism was not initially on the radar of the government and Congress, but it was a political solution to include proteins in the tax-exempt basic food basket. The exemption of meat had been facing resistance because, in theory, it would cause an increase of 0.53 percentage points in the standard rate, estimated at 26.5% without considering this exception.

The increase would happen because the reform is based on maintaining current tax collection. Therefore, reducing taxes on products such as animal protein, cheese and medicines, as the Lower House has done, would increase the standard rate charged on other products.

According to coalition parliamentarians who defended the inclusion of proteins in the basic food basket, the contradiction between increasing the list of exceptions and capping the tax rate could be mitigated by efficiency gains in the fight against tax evasion, delinquency, and litigation in tax collection. This gain could occur, said a source in the technical area, but it will depend on how the collection of IBS and CBS is structured.

The government’s ambition is to have a system that is at the cutting edge of technology, like the banking services in Brazil today. This would make tax collection more efficient and the country’s consumption tax system the most modern in the world.

These changes will be discussed at the same time as the Finance Ministry is working on the next stage: income tax. The issue has been studied by the technical area since last year, but the proposal will begin to be formatted in August. The plan is to send it to Congress at the end of this year, after the elections, in order to discuss it in the first half of 2025.

As soon as he was officially confirmed as the rapporteur for the regulation project, Senator Eduardo Braga told journalists that he would maintain the objective of guaranteeing the neutrality of the tax burden in this case. He was also the rapporteur for the constitutional amendment proposal that established the tax reform.

The bill is expected to pass through the Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ) before going to the floor vote. As the supplementary bill is expected to be altered by Mr. Braga and receive possible amendments from other senators, the tendency is for the proposal to still go back to the Lower House this year.

The government intends to finish the approval of this part of the consumer tax reform regulations by December. At the same time, the Lower House is still debating the project for the management committee of the new IBS.

*Por Fernando Exman, Julia Lindner, Caetano Tonet, Lu Aiko Otta — Brasília

Source:Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
12 de July de 2024/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: Ministry of Finance and Senate, safeguards for consumer, tax reform rate cap
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Brazil bans online health and teaching degrees
  • Legal disputes involving publicly traded firms on the rise in Brazil
  • Brazil’s poultry exports to 17 countries suspended following avian flu outbreak
  • Preventive Law.
  • Brazil confirms first avian flu case on poultry farm

Arquivos

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Bill favors states indebted to federal government Americanas scandal spurs scrutiny on executive bonus recovery
Scroll to top