• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • ESG
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Trade war pushes Brazilian companies to seek new markets

Record exports to 42 countries highlight a growing effort to diversify sales beyond traditional destinations amid global uncertainty

 

 

 

06/23/2026 

The trade war launched by U.S. President Donald Trump has heightened the urgency for Brazilian companies to find new markets for their products. The results are already evident. In 2025, Brazil posted record export volumes to 42 countries, according to data from the Ministry of Development, Industry, Trade and Services.

Among the destinations that received record shipments—excluding the United States and China—were Canada, India, Turkey, Paraguay, Uruguay, Bangladesh, the Philippines, Panama, Pakistan, and Norway. The trend could gain further momentum in the coming years as Brazil expands its network of trade agreements to cover its exports.

“Many companies already have diversification in their DNA. But revisiting export strategies has become necessary in light of changes in the global environment,” Tatiana Prazeres, the ministry’s foreign trade secretary, told Valor. “The global environment, marked by challenges, shifts in trade policy, and geopolitical tensions, has fostered greater pragmatism among both governments and the private sector,” said Constanza Negri, international trade and integration manager at Brazil’s National Confederation of Industry.

Government officials argue that companies’ growing search for alternative markets has helped accelerate trade negotiations, including the Mercosur-European Union agreement. Last week, Brazil’s Congress approved two Mercosur trade agreements that are part of this broader diversification strategy: accords with Singapore and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), whose members are Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein. Taken together, the agreements increase the share of Brazil’s trade covered by trade deals from 12% to 31%.

That figure could increase further.

Mercosur is negotiating a trade agreement with Canada, which has moved from the 10th-largest destination for Brazilian exports in 2023 to the 8th-largest in 2025. According to the ministry, negotiations are also underway with the United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Lebanon, and Vietnam.

Last week, on the sidelines of the G7 summit, President Lula discussed the potential launch of Mercosur-Japan trade negotiations with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. The start of those talks could be announced at the South American bloc’s summit later this month.

Brazil is also seeking to expand its existing agreements with India and Mexico. Negri highlighted the speed with which Congress approved the agreements with the European Union, Singapore, and EFTA, a departure from Brazil’s traditionally slower approach to trade liberalization. In her view, the debate is no longer about whether trade agreements are necessary, but about which agreements make the most sense for Brazil.

Prazeres argued that the Singapore and EFTA agreements are more important to Brazilian exporters than many observers realize. Although exports to those markets are heavily concentrated in crude oil and fuels, the range of products shipped there is significantly more diversified than aggregate trade figures suggest. Of the roughly 8,000 categories of goods exported by Brazil in 2025, about 2,500 were sold to Singapore, and 2,280 were exported to EFTA countries.

According to Prazeres, those figures indicate substantial room for Brazilian companies—particularly industrial exporters and producers of higher-value-added goods—to expand their presence in those markets. “There are many opportunities for companies in products that may represent only a small share of Brazil’s exports to a given country, but can make a significant difference for an individual business,” she said. Beyond trade diversification, government studies project meaningful economic gains from the Singapore and EFTA agreements.

Singapore is viewed as a gateway to Southeast Asia, one of the world’s most open and dynamic regions. The ministry estimates that the agreement could increase Brazil’s gross domestic product by R$28 billion, boost investment by R$11 billion, and expand total trade flows by $40 billion by 2040, driven by higher exports and imports. For the EFTA agreement, projections indicate a R$2.69 billion increase in GDP, an additional R$660 million in investment, and a R$3.34 billion rise in Brazilian exports. Both agreements have received strong support from industry groups for their potential to expand trade and investment opportunities.

Negri noted that the EFTA deal is especially significant because it strengthens Brazil’s ties to a market closely integrated with the European Union. She also pointed out progress in areas like investment regulations and government procurement. In contrast, the Singapore agreement is seen as a means to expand Mercosur’s access to Asian markets.

Industry groups, however, advocated stringent rules of origin to prevent trade triangulation, in which products from third countries could enter Mercosur via Singapore. “Trade relationships do not develop on a blank sheet of paper,” said Leandro Consentino, a political scientist and professor at business school Insper, emphasizing the political aspect of trade policy. “It is not solely an economic issue. There is also a significant political element, especially this year when both Brazil and the U.S. are approaching elections.”

*By Giordanna Neves and Lu Aiko Otta — Brasília

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

23 de June de 2026/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: Brazilian companies to seek new markets, Trade war pushes
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Sale of Bahia mining company nears completion
  • Trade war pushes Brazilian companies to seek new markets
  • Pension withdrawals slow after Brazil’s financial tax change
  • TCU warns government of growing risk of bailing out state-run companies
  • World Cup has limited impact on Brazil’s inflation, study finds

Arquivos

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
Pension withdrawals slow after Brazil’s financial tax change Sale of Bahia mining company nears completion
Scroll to top