• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Public spending watchdog hampers maneuver on Eletrobras

Aroldo Cedraz — Foto: Jorge William/Agência O Globo
Aroldo Cedraz — Foto: Jorge William/Agência O Globo

The Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) confirmed Tuesday the May 18 date for the resumption of the Eletrobras privatization trial. Contaminated by political polarization, the operation gained a curious chapter last week, when TCU member Aroldo Cedraz surprised his colleagues by suggesting that an eventual attempt to retake control of the company by the government would be eased.

Rapporteur of the matter in the public spending watchdog, Mr. Cedraz delivered his opinion to his colleagues less than two hours before the beginning of the session. Among the proposals was a change in the mechanism that aims to protect minority shareholders against the takeover by means of a hostile bid, known as the “poison pill.”

A week earlier, Twitter’s board had triggered the poison pill against the onslaught of businessman Elon Musk. Not even this strategy, however, was enough to stop the billionaire, who now owns the social media.

In Brazil, the tool has also been dubbed the “anti-Lula clause.” Leader in the polls for this year’s election, the former president has already spoken out against the privatization of Eletrobras, and his allies said he would reverse the operation if elected.

To make such a maneuver more difficult, the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) has included a poison bill in the privatization model. Anyone interested in taking control of Eletrobras — whether the federal government or a private-sector organization — would have to pay a high amount to the other shareholders and then convince them to change the company’s bylaws.

Under the rules in force in the model delivered to the TCU, the person interested in taking control must make a public offer to buy the stakes of the other shareholders at a price three times the highest stock price recorded for the asset. Even so, even with a share of more than 50% of the voting capital, the voting power would be restricted to 10%.

To break this second barrier, a shareholders’ meeting would have to be called to approve the change in the bylaws. Mr. Cedraz considered those conditions “unfair” for an eventual strategic need for the retaking of the company by the federal government. He then proposed a kind of antidote to the poison.

“In order to protect the prerogative of the federal government to, at any time, reverse the privatization process of Eletrobras, by paying fair — but not exorbitant — amounts to the other shareholders, this TCU member proposes the revision of the poison pill clause suggested by BNDES,” he said.

His central argument is based on the strategic importance of freshwater reservoirs, which has led some governments to meddle to prevent market abuses by private-sector hydroelectric generation companies.

“This kind of intervention has proven necessary, mainly because of the ongoing global power crisis and transition. While France resumes studies to nationalize a large company in the electricity sector, Spain and Portugal present to the European Union a plan for state intervention in the sector through measures aimed at lowering power prices in the Iberian Peninsula,” the rapporteur argued.

The proposal surprised the market, and even more the other TCU members. President Jair Bolsonaro’s main ally in the court, Jorge Oliveira, was warned by technicians in his office about the antidote and called member Benjamin Zymler, considered a technical reference in the electricity sector.

The two acted quickly and, a few minutes before the beginning of the trial, convinced Mr. Cedraz to back off. The rapporteur announced the withdrawal of the idea in the middle of the reading of his vote, which caused another surprise in the room, the second in a few hours. “Shame on you,” said one member during the session.

With Mr. Cedraz’s change, the “anti-Lula clause” was preserved. According to Valor, the rapporteur was convinced that it would not be necessary to privatize in order to avoid abuses by a private partner. In such a situation, the federal government could simply cancel the Eletrobras concessions and take over the contracts through a new state-owned company.

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

27 de April de 2022/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: Eletrobras, Public spending, watchdog
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Brazil confirms first avian flu case on poultry farm
  • Marfrig and BRF merger creates R$152bn global food powerhouse
  • Lula’s vetoes on offshore wind bill face backlash in Congress
  • Brazil’s ethanol seeks bigger role in energy transition
  • Bosch taps Brazilian know-how as the world enters “Latin mode”

Arquivos

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Global risk perception worsens, weighs on markets Even with war, oil sustains trade surplus
Scroll to top