• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • ESG
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

New U.S. tariff may hit up to 45% of Brazil exports

Government sees smaller impact, but companies face narrow path to challenge 25% duty proposed under Section 301

06/03/2026 

A new 25% tariff put up for public comment by the U.S. on Monday (1) could affect as much as about 45% of Brazil’s exports to the U.S., depending on how the calculation is made. Among estimates collected by Valor, the government has the most modest impact estimate, at 21%, although it expects “major losses” for the affected sectors.

Government spokespeople said they do not believe the proposal will effectively become tariffs, but experts noted that, unlike the duties imposed in 2025 by U.S. President Donald Trump, those that could result from the current measure are considered difficult to challenge. In addition, other ongoing investigations could lead to new tariffs.

The new tariff proposed by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is based on Section 301, a 1974 law. The report, which concluded the investigation opened against Brazil in July 2025, argues that certain Brazilian policies and practices related to digital trade, such as Pix, intellectual property, anti-corruption efforts, and market access, among others, negatively affect the U.S.

The punitive tariff proposal was put up for public comment, meaning the 25% tariff does not take effect immediately and opens a period for interested parties to submit comments. A public hearing is scheduled for July 6 in Washington, D.C.

Brazilian products are already subject to a 10% duty, imposed globally by Trump after the country’s Supreme Court invalidated the sweeping tariff package. That measure is valid until the end of July.

Welber Barral, a partner at BMJ and at law firm Barral Parente Pinheiro, said the strategy now for affected companies and sectors is to file petitions and demonstrate the tariff’s impact on U.S. production and prices.

He said companies will have a better chance if they can mount their defense together with U.S. importers, who can describe the effect of the new tariff on their costs and the importance of Brazilian supply.

Legal challenges

Vera Kanas, a lawyer specialized in international trade and a partner at VK Law, noted that, in addition to the process that led to the 25% tariff, Brazil is, alongside 59 other countries, the target of another Section 301 investigation into imports from countries that allegedly fail to combat forced labor.

Kanas said the tariffs now proposed under Section 301 are harder to overturn than the 40%-50% sweeping tariff the U.S. imposed on Brazilian imports last year under the IEEPA, the law used in cases of international economic emergencies. Section 301, she said, is more consolidated legislation. “This time, unlike with the IEEPA, there should not be U.S. companies importing Brazilian products on the assumption that they will later be able to request a refund,” Kanas noted.

The USTR report says the new tariff should not apply to aircraft and parts, orange juice, some foods such as coffee and meat, pulp, certain minerals, fertilizers, and critical and strategic minerals.

Valor found 986 items on the exemption list, based on six-digit Harmonized System codes. Of those, Brazil exported 666 products to the U.S. in 2024, before the effects of the current Trump administration’s policies.

In terms of quantity, there are more items than the 433 that were exempted from last year’s so-called 40% to 50% tariff and that were effectively shipped in 2024. In terms of exempted values, however, the list now proposed is smaller because certain types of crude cast iron were not included in the exemptions.

According to Valor’s calculations, based on 2024 exports, before the impact of the current Trump administration’s tariff policy, the new measure could affect 45.8% of shipments to the U.S., worth $18.5 billion.

The Section 301 report does not affect products subject to sectoral tariffs applied on national security grounds under Section 232, another U.S. trade law, from 1962. That process is therefore running in parallel with the Section 301 investigations and includes items such as steel, aluminum, and derivatives.

Impact estimates

The American Chamber of Commerce says the new tariff could affect about $15 billion in exports to the U.S., or 35.5% of Brazilian shipments, in a calculation that used the U.S. 2024 database. The segments potentially most affected are basic industry, machinery and equipment, agribusiness, forest products, and processed foods. Pig iron could be the product most affected, with $1.54 billion in exports subject to the tariff.

Sergio Vale, chief economist at MB Associados, said the proposal should mainly affect the manufacturing industry, in line with Trump’s campaign to reindustrialize the country. Vale estimates that about 27% of what Brazil exported to the U.S. in 2025, or $10.1 billion, would be exposed to the new tariff.

He said the measure will result in an even greater decline in the U.S. share of Brazilian exports and an increasingly closer relationship between Brazil and China. In 2024, the U.S. absorbed 12% of Brazilian exports, a share that fell to 10.8% last year. Over the same period, China’s share rose to 28.7% from 28%.

Vale said it seems almost inevitable that the new tariff will materialize, even with the USTR process still open. “The U.S. government offered a menu of very subjective justifications, such as deforestation or intellectual property, or intangible ones, such as Pix. The instant-payment system is embedded in the Brazilian economy, made credit cheaper, brought a large number of people into the banking system, and there is no going back.”

More optimistically, Márcio Elias Rosa, minister of Development, Industry, Trade and Services, said the new measure could cover 21% of total sales to the U.S. The minister said 54% of exports to the U.S. are free from the sweeping tariff and 25% are under Section 232. He cited machinery and equipment among the sectors most affected, with “major losses” for employment, income, and industry. When citing the most affected segments, Rosa said the impact would occur if the proposal becomes tariffs, “which we believe will not happen.”

According to José Ronaldo Souza Junior, CEO of Quantivis Analytics, the Section 301 measure could affect as much as 43.7% of Brazilian exports to the U.S., considering 2025 data. In value terms, exports of those products to the U.S. totaled $16.5 billion last year. He said the calculations are not precise because it is necessary to reconcile data from the USTR list, which uses an eight-digit classification, with the Brazilian government’s more limited six-digit Mercosur standard.

*By Álvaro Fagundes, Grace Vasconcelos, Hamilton Ferrari, Marcelo Osakabe, Mariana Andrade and Marta Watanabe — São Paulo and Brasília

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

3 de June de 2026/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: New U.S. tariff may hit up to 45% of Brazil exports
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • New U.S. tariff may hit up to 45% of Brazil exports
  • Raízen nears $1.4 billion sale of Argentina business
  • Pix entrou na mira porque deu certo, avalia procuradora do Banco Central
  • OFFSHORE WORKERS: LABOR RISKS THAT COMPANIES SHOULD NOT OVERLOOK.
  • NEWSLETTER MURRAY ADVOGADOS – May 2026

Arquivos

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
Raízen nears $1.4 billion sale of Argentina business
Scroll to top