• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Retailer Ultrafarma claimed statute of limitations, errors in lawsuits

Tax enforcement chief at São Paulo Finance Department negotiates plea deal with prosecutors

 

 

08/22/2025 

Before Operation Ícaro, which investigates corruption in the reimbursement of Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS) credits involving the Ultrafarma and Fast Shop chains, the pharmacy retailer had already been facing lawsuits from São Paulo city and other municipalities in the state over unpaid taxes and fees. In some of these cases, the company argued that tax debts were barred statute of limitations, claimed procedural errors, or even paid part of the debts, but the proceedings remained in court.

A review of lawsuits filed with the São Paulo State Court of Justice, where the chain is concentrated, shows that some collections date back 13 years without successful payment.

One lawsuit filed by the São Paulo City Hall for nearly R$200,000, under the tax enforcement court, began in 2019, when the company failed to settle the initial claim. Ultrafarma argued that the debt certificate was flawed, but the court held that it was sufficiently clear and granted five days for settlement.

The case then stalled, remained suspended for a year in 2021, and only resumed on Wednesday (20), days after Operation Ícaro exposed the alleged corruption scheme, when the court reported that it was awaiting the terms of an installment plan.

Another lawsuit, from 2018, concerned unpaid health-waste collection fees totaling R$243,000 for 2012, 2013, and 2016. Since taxpayers can only be charged within five years of the obligation arising, only the 2012 debts were time-barred.

This debate dragged on for three years, with a change of judge, until the case advanced this month, on August 20, when the court reported that it had been included in a debt-recovery package prepared by the City Hall and the National Justice Council (CNJ), covering around 11,700 lawsuits. Ultrafarma is part of this group, but the installment plan is still pending.

In Santa Isabel (São Paulo), where Ultrafarma’s owner, Sidney Oliveira, lives, a 2022 lawsuit over a much smaller debt—R$740 in tax on services (ISS)—was paid nearly a year and a half later, but the case remains in court. “Silence will be interpreted as abandonment of the case, leading to its dismissal,” the tax enforcement court reported on July 29.

Ultrafarma’s lawyers, as well as the São Paulo and Santa Isabel city halls, declined to comment.

On August 12, the São Paulo state Prosecution Service launched Operation Ícaro, targeting Ultrafarma, Fast Shop, and the Finance Secretariat’s tax enforcement chief, Artur Silva Neto. Prosecutors are investigating whether Mr. Silva Neto received bribes to expedite Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS) reimbursements for the companies.

On Thursday (21), Fast Shop director Mario Gomes had his R$25 million bail suspended and remains free after being released from temporary detention. Mr. Oliveira is seeking the same relief, claiming he lacks the funds.

Other companies cited in the investigation include Oxxo, fuel retailer Rede 28, and houseware chain Krystalmix. Authorities estimate R$1 billion may have been paid in bribes, with additional firms under scrutiny.

A potential plea deal by Mr. Silva Neto is adding pressure on the companies, given the possible revelations about the scheme. In case records, Judge Paulo Mello of the 1st Court for Tax Crimes even cited the potential impact of such a collaboration.

In recent days, executives in the food retail and pharmacy sectors have been exchanging messages to determine whether other competitors might also be implicated.

The concern is whether the alleged scheme involved not only expediting approvals but also inflating requests and creating fake reimbursement invoices, a line of inquiry that prosecutors were still pursuing last week, according to sources.

Valor has also learned that Smart Tax, a company owned by Mr. Silva Neto’s mother and allegedly the hub of the scheme, approached firms in the services sector, including mobile telecom operators, to offer ways to speed up reimbursements.

Executives from pharmacy chains told Valor that, in their dealings with the São Paulo Finance Secretariat, there is no direct access to tax auditors by phone or messaging—as alleged in the Ultrafarma and Fast Shop case. However, they said some officials act like “key account managers” for taxpayers with large ICMS volumes.

“They call us every month to check on sales performance, which helps them project ICMS collections,” said the CFO of a pharmacy chain. “We never know when we’ll get our credits released, but they want to know about revenues.”

The Ultrafarma investigation has also revived reports of personal disputes between Mr. Oliveira and Manoel Conde Neto, who founded Farma Conde in 1993, one of the most traditional chains in the Vale do Paraíba and North Coast areas.

Mr. Conde Neto was arrested in Operation Monte Cristo in 2017, which uncovered a tax-evasion scheme involving pharmacies and distributors. He was indicted, convicted in 2023 to four years and eight months in prison, but later received a judicial pardon under a plea deal.

He was also the first to name Mr. Oliveira to prosecutors and the Organized Crime Task Force (Gaeco) in a 2021 deposition. For some industry executives, this marked the beginning of Mr. Oliveira’s legal troubles.

“They haven’t spoken in years, and don’t want to hear each other’s names. Sidney hired some of Manoel’s former staff in the past, which caused problems,” said the owner of a family-run chain in São Paulo. “If Sidney is convicted, two of the industry’s most prominent businessmen could end up behind bars.”

According to prosecutors in São José dos Campos (São Paulo), the scheme involved products “traveling” between Goiás and São Paulo to pay less ICMS. In his deposition, Mr. Conde Neto cited Ultrafarma as an example: at one point, it sold two erectile dysfunction pills for R$0.67, when the ICMS cost alone would have been R$3.13.

“Until last year, Ultrafarma was selling at inexplicable prices, and it’s inexplicable that the tax authority didn’t shut them down. Even I underreported 10% of sales, while they underreported 60%,” Mr. Conde Neto told prosecutors at the time. Ultrafarma later paid R$31.9 million in fines following three tax assessments and struck a deal with prosecutors.

In a statement, Ultrafarma said it is cooperating with the investigation and that the information reported “will be duly clarified during the proceedings and will demonstrate innocence throughout the trial.” Mr. Conde Neto’s lawyers did not comment. The São Paulo Finance Department also declined to comment.

*By Adriana Mattos — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

22 de August de 2025/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: errors in lawsuits, Retailer Ultrafarma claimed statute of limitations
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Brazilian appetite for stocks falls amid tension with U.S.
  • Retailer Ultrafarma claimed statute of limitations, errors in lawsuits
  • Banks start blocking transactions of Justice Moraes
  • Antitrust body secures majority to approve BRF-Marfrig merger
  • How Brazil can attract more international investors

Arquivos

  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Banks start blocking transactions of Justice Moraes Brazilian appetite for stocks falls amid tension with U.S.
Scroll to top