Posts

Future curve suggests barrel north of $110 by the end of the year, 10% above Central Bank’s main scenario

06/14/2022


The main scenario for oil prices used by the Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (Copom) to fine-tune its interest rate policy is being called into question amid new pressures on the commodity.

The Central Bank adopted a scenario A for oil at its March meeting to avoid dealing with the volatility of prices, which at the time were over $120 a barrel.

Instead, the committee assumed that “oil prices follow approximately the futures market curve until the end of 2022, ending the year at $100/barrel, and then start increasing 2% per year in January 2023,” according to the English version of the minutes of the 245th meeting of the Copom.

Lately, however, the future curve suggests a barrel north of $110 by the end of the year, which means a 10% higher price. The Brent oil price was around $120 a barrel earlier on Monday.

Etore Sanchez, the chief economist of Ativa Investimentos, says that a portion of the fuel price used in the Central Bank’s models is formed from the opinions of industry experts. “Because it is discretionary, it can end up mitigating the worsening,” he said.

Mr. Sanchez estimates that the price of gasoline in the domestic market is about 35% below international prices. Many other market economists are finding similar spreads in their calculations, around 30%, and some believe that Petrobras will soon be forced to raise its prices.

This spread tends to mitigate at least part of the price drop expected if the government achieves all its objectives with a package aimed at cutting federal and state taxes, partly temporarily.

The fuel price hikes surprised Central Bank’s directors, who in recent statements have highlighted the fact that the Brent oil price is no longer such a reliable indicator of the evolution of prices of oil products.

Central Bank President Roberto Campos Neto — Foto: Billy Boss/Câmara dos Deputados

Central Bank President Roberto Campos Neto — Foto: Billy Boss/Câmara dos Deputados

As many had predicted, the adoption of scenario A by the Central Bank has made it difficult to keep inflation expectations in check. Many analysts have maintained the previous practice of projecting inflation based on the current price of the product.

This is one factor among many others that explain the detachment of the Central Bank’s inflation projections for 2023, which at the Copom’s meeting in May was 3.4%, from market projections.

Market expectations for inflation in 2023 are already at 4.6%, according to an analysis published Monday by Valor, compared with the Central Bank’s target of 3.25% for the year.

*By Alex Ribeiro — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Are we in for another round of high oil prices? - The H Group - Salem,  Oregon

Besides putting pressure on fuel prices, high oil prices are likely to contribute this year to a greater-than-expected growth in revenues from royalties and special participations — an additional amount levied on specific fields — collected by the federal government, states and municipalities.

The total value of government participation may increase to R$111.5 billion this year, potentially an all-time high, compared with R$77.82 billion last year, according to calculations by the Brazilian Center for Infrastructure (CBIE) prepared at the request of Valor.

For states and cities, the combined amount could increase to R$59.6 billion this year from R$41.6 billion last year. The distribution, however, is concentrated and benefits relatively few states and cities.

Of the total revenues from royalties and special participation projected for this year, R$42.5 billion are expected to be collected by the federal government. Part of this amount – whatever exceeds the federal government’s budget forecast – can be allocated to the fund to mitigate the ups and downs of fuel prices in the domestic market. Royalties and special participations intended for states and municipalities are unlikely to be affected. The proposal, however, is still being debated.

Currently, of the royalties received by the federal government, about 25% are allocated to the special fund, which is expected to transfer resources to states and municipalities. The remainder goes to the Navy Command and the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. In the case of special participation, 80% goes to the Ministry of Mines and Energy and 20% to the Ministry of Environment.

The former director of the National Petroleum Agency (ANP) and now fiscal advisor to the Legislative Assembly of Rio (Alerj) Magda Chambriard says there is flexibility in the allocation of the portion of royalties and participations that remains with the federal government, which would allow the government to direct part of the resources to the new fund of equalization. Ms. Chambriard, who has already worked in this division, says that it is difficult to change the portion destined for the social fund, which serves Health and Education, but that it is possible to redirect the rest of the resources sent to the Navy and ministries.

“The federal government usually allocates part of these resources to specific bodies in the structure of ministries to reduce the primary deficit. But funding for [Health and Education] actions is more rigid,” she says. For her, the equalization fund is a good way out, but it should have a temporary nature, under the risk of draining resources from the federal government in a scenario of continuous rise in oil prices. “Money is short, so it is not appropriate to give this instrument a permanent character.”

According to CBIE projections, R$36.2 billion in government participation are expected to be allocated this year for the states and R$ 23.4 billion for cities. The other participations, such as the rate of occupation or retention of area, signature bonus payments and others, are seen as totaling R$9.4 billion.

The calculation considered an increase in the production of oil and liquid natural gas (LNG) to 3.1 million barrels a day in 2022 from 2.9 million barrels a day on average last year. It also considered an average price this year of $95 a barrel, 34% higher than the average price of $70.86 last year. The average exchange rate for 2021, of R$5.4 to the dollar, was maintained for this year. The 2022 values were projected based on the governmental participations received last year.

The expected increase in revenue from royalties and special participation, therefore, has a structural component, from the increase in production already expected for 2022 and for the next few years, and a cyclical component, given mainly by commodity prices, said Adriano Pires, head of CBIE.

The production of the sector this year is expected to virtually double by 2027 to between 5 and 6 million barrels per day, Mr. Pires said. Such an increase is likely to be driven by oil from the pre-salt layer, a vast reserve off the coast that accounts for 70% of production and is expected to reach 90% in five years, he said.

Even if prices fall in relation to current levels, Mr. Pires said, the collection with participations related to oil is expected to grow due to the higher production volume. “This money can cause a revolution in the public accounts and it is necessary that governments start thinking about what to do with it.”

Economist Sol Garson, a specialist in public accounts, says that high oil prices are expected to raise revenues with royalties and special participations, but in a very concentrated way among states and municipalities, since they are determined by the existence of oil wells.

Ms. Garson, Rio’s former finance secretary, is also concerned about what additional funds from oil would mean for public accounts. Even if states set aside these funds for social security, for example, they can reduce the contribution of the Treasury in the year and thus free up resources for other functions. In São Paulo, the resources are fully allocated to SPPrev, an agency that manages the state’s pension system.

According to the CBIE projections, Rio de Janeiro is expected to receive 76.6% of all governmental participations paid to states, while São Paulo gets a little more than 10% and Espírito Santo will have 8.9%.

In Rio de Janeiro, Secretary of Finance Nelson Rocha said that higher production and oil international prices, now intensified by the Russia-Ukraine war, made the initial forecast for the state collection of royalties and special participations from oil in 2022 jump to R$30 billion from R$19 billion.

Secretary technicians point to an amount of R$31.7 billion, a calculation that takes into account the Brent barrel at $102.11 and the dollar at R$5.50. As a rule, most of the resources are transferred to state social security, which is in deficit, shared between municipalities and municipal funds. The last ANP official projection, published on February 9, before the war, therefore, indicated collection of $26.54 billion for Rio in the year.

If the Rio’s forecast is confirmed, oil revenues will be 63.8% higher than the R$19.35 billion of 2021. For comparison, the amount is equivalent to almost a third of the net revenue contained in the Annual Budget Law, of R$92.9 billion. It is also similar to the net current revenue of Rio’s capital city in 2021 (R$31.3 billion), discounting the proceeds from the concession of water utility Cedae’s services (R$6.2 billion).

In Espírito Santo, 40% of the oil royalties and 15% of the special participations go to the state’s sovereign fund, which aims to generate intergenerational savings mechanisms and to help and to finance the state’s economic development projects.

The Espírito Santo state government has also been following oil swings and has revised the estimates of participations revenues for 2022, said Luiz Claudio Nogueira, coordinator of the Espírito Santo oil and gas team. The projection for this year’s collection of royalties and special participations of oil rose to R$2.5 billion from R$1.4 billion. The estimate, he said, considers a barrel at $90 and exchange rate at R$5.50 to the dollar.

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

To former president of Energy Research Company (EPE) Luiz Barroso, rising oil prices may drive demand for biofuels

03/07/2022


Luiz Barroso — Foto: Leo Pinheiro/Valor

Luiz Barroso — Foto: Leo Pinheiro/Valor

Luiz Barroso, former president of Energy Research Company (EPE) and the current president of consultancy PSR, sees opportunities, especially in Brazil, for renewable energy with the rise in oil and gas prices caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Last week, after the outbreak of the conflict, the international prices of the oil barrel went over the barrier of $100 and saw the highest prices of the last eight years.

For Mr. Barroso, the global geopolitics are already aligned towards the replacement of fossil sources, with higher carbon emissions, by renewable ones. With the scenario of rising fossil fuel prices, the search for clean energy and greater consumption efficiency is likely to accelerate, as well as the development of new technologies, he believes. “Access to energy transition technologies is a geopolitical tool,” he emphasizes.

In this context, the expert says that Brazil may pay more attention to biofuels, in addition to pre-salt gas, as a way to become less dependent on liquefied natural gas (LNG), which is imported.

On the energy planning side, he also believes that the crisis will lead to questions about energy integration in Europe and, consequently, to the search for reducing European dependence on Russian gas, which can increase exports from regions such as North Africa and the United States. Below are the main excerpts from the interview.

Valor: What are the impacts of the Russia-Ukraine crisis for the energy transition in Brazil?

Luiz Barroso: Brazil automatically aligns the main objectives of the energy transition: the cleanest energy, the renewable ones, are the most competitive. This foundation remains and already places us among the global leaders in terms of low carbon intensity in the energy sector. With the crisis, LNG [liquefied natural gas] becomes more expensive, which increases the attractiveness of renewables. This scenario also brings pre-salt gas into the energy equation, with the attribute of greater independence from international prices.

Valor: And biofuels?

Mr. Barroso: The increase in oil prices may stimulate the demand for biofuels, a sector in which Brazil is self-sufficient, in addition to accelerating the discussion of other forms of sustainable mobility. Brazil can also seek to reduce its international dependence on other important components, such as fertilizers, and increase its role in other energies that will redesign the future of energy, such as green hydrogen and, who knows, carbon capture and sequestration.

Valor: Is there any other source that can benefit, in the Brazilian market, from the geopolitical crisis?

Mr. Barroso: The current scenario reminds us of the importance of actions on the demand side and is an opportunity to organize the national energy efficiency agenda. There is room for much gain in commerce and industry. Reducing consumption, through efficiency, is the cheapest and most self-sufficient energy the system can achieve, in addition to being a permanent energy gain. This adds to dynamic demand response actions at prices and tariffs [mechanisms to charge more for energy at times of peak consumption]. On the other hand, there is the reflection that it is essential to transform the way we consume energy with new emerging technologies. There is no point in having an abundant supply of hydrogen and electricity if most of the demand does not run on hydrogen and electricity.

Valor: Could there also be a trend towards greater search for the use of oil, gas and coal in Brazil?

Mr. Barroso: For purely economic reasons, I don’t believe so; all these energy sources will be much more expensive in this decade.

Valor: What are the immediate impacts that you see on global energy policy, especially in Europe, as a result of the current crisis?

Mr. Barroso: More immediately, there will be a quest to reduce dependence on Russian gas, which supplies 40% of European gas consumption, and to ensure sufficient storage levels to ensure consumption in the coming winter. Russia is responsible for more than 60% of the total energy imported by the European Union.

Valor: How can Europe replace Russian gas?

Mr. Barroso: On the supply side, abandoning Russian gas means importing non-Russian gas, basically from North Africa, Norway and the United States, increasing coal production and relying on nuclear power plants. It will also be important to reduce energy consumption. This can be done through energy efficiency actions, such as reducing the temperature of heaters, which are mostly gas-powered in Europe.

Valor: How will conflict impact the energy transition? 

Mr. Barroso: The European energy transition was already one of the most ambitious before the war and it could be accelerated. The geopolitical imperative is aligned and the current environment puts further pressure on reducing dependence on fossil fuels. This can accelerate the development of the technologies we will need in a carbon-neutral future. Massive investments have made it possible to create economies of scale that, together with increases in oil and gas prices, reduce the additional cost of choosing a clean technology over one that emits a greater amount of greenhouse gases, making renewables more accessible to others parts of the world, such as Brazil. But it is not possible to say that it will be a global trend, as each country has its reality and its energy transition.

Valor: May it be necessary to review the emission reduction targets?

Mr. Barroso: I don’t believe in expanding emission reduction targets right away, but the possible increase in emissions in the short term could, in fact, impact the planet’s carbon budget. Further on, this can challenge the sufficiency of the targets, which can trigger a global discussion about who should raise the target and when.

Valor: Could an eventual increase in military spending in the world as a result of this crisis lead to a reduction in resources and collaborative efforts between countries for the energy transition?

Mr. Barroso: It’s still too early to talk about that. In absolute terms, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] has planned military expenditures that have not always been met, in amounts currently lower than the annual budgets of government stimulus programs and private direct investment to new technologies for energy transition. So, in theory, I don’t believe in resource reduction. However, and speculating a bit, we may have Western sanctions that ban some countries, like Russia, from accessing some key technologies. Access to energy transition technologies is a geopolitical tool.

Source: Valor Econômico