Posts

Many economists are questioning technical basis and rhetoric behind Central Bank's decision — Foto: Raphael Ribeiro/BC
Many economists are questioning technical basis and rhetoric behind Central Bank’s decision — Foto: Raphael Ribeiro/BC

Economic analysts, in general, understood that the Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (Copom) signaled a rate of 12.75% per year at the end of the current interest rate tightening cycle. Yet many still see this level as the floor for the Selic, Brazil’s benchmark interest rate.

Economists and traders told Valor that the end-of-cycle signal, this time, was weaker and subject to revisions since the committee linked the future path of interest rates to the evolution of oil prices.

Others say that, even considering that the Central Bank’s intention is to stop at 12.75% per year, the inflationary scenario will remain challenging and, as a result, force the Copom to do more.

Others say that the cycle is unlikely to end up at 12.75% because, in that case, the committee will make one last sharp move in interest rates, 100 basis points. The Central Bank typically ends tightening cycles more smoothly.

There are still concerns, in part of the market, of an exaggeration in monetary policy. But even those who believe that the Central Bank has gone too far on interest rates consider it unlikely that it will deliver a rate lower than 12.75% per year. Wednesday, interest rates rose to 11.75% per year, and the Copom explicitly signaled a new 100 bp increase, which would take the Selic to 12.75%.

BGC Liquidez presents a look at the market mood shortly after the Copom’s decision in a survey of 162 economists and traders, distributed to its clients on Thursday.

Only 16% of respondents think that the Central Bank will stop at 12.75%. The most common bet, of 42% of those who took part in the survey, is that the interest rate will rise to 13.25%. On the eve of the Copom meeting, in another survey by the BGC, with 207 participants, only 26% mentioned this percentage. End-of-cycle bets of 13%, meanwhile, shrank to 6% from 27%.

This is, however, a snapshot of the moment, and many economic analysts want to wait longer for an eventual change in their bets for the Selic rate at the end of the cycle. They say the language of the Central Bank usually changes a lot between the release of the Copom statement and the minutes. Next week, the monetary authority will also release the Inflation Report, with a press conference.

Many economists are questioning, after the Copom meeting, the technical basis and rhetoric behind the decision, so they are waiting for the Central Bank to better explain what was discussed in it.

A question mark is the fact that the committee presented projections for the price index in an alternative scenario, incorporating a good part of the oil price drop that occurred until Wednesday, to show that inflation reaches the target in 2023 without a dose of interest rate higher than 12.75% per year.

Some in the market are skeptical about that, so much so that the projections for the Selic rate have risen. There was already a questioning of the monetary authority’s calculations due to the fact that the Copom’s inflation projections are below market estimates, of 3.7%.

Another point that bothers many economists is the change in the way the Copom analyzes the balance of risks. The committee basically said that the chances of inflation exceeding expectations were lower because much of the fiscal fears had already materialized in market expectations and in the foreign exchange rate.

For some, the Copom swept some fiscal uncertainty under the carpet to avoid having an inflation forecast adjusted by the balance of risks that requires an interest rate higher than 12.75% per year.

But this may just be a concern of economists, who have a more technical view of the Copom’s decision-making process. But market operators consulted by Valor on Thursday were more comfortable with the communication, despite the large number of people who think that the interest rate will have to go over 12.75% per year.

The survey by BGC Liquidez shows a divergence in the reading of the Copom statement between economists and traders. Among economists, 69% thought the message was “dovish,” or less inclined to tightening. Among traders, this percentage is 35%.

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com