Suspicions involve product sales between the group’s physical and digital divisions, expenses recorded outside actual periods

10/03/2024


Committee indicates that other areas require further investigation — Foto: Marcia Foletto
Committee indicates that other areas require further investigation — Photo: Marcia Foletto

The independent committee hired by Americanas to investigate the retailer’s financial discrepancies has discovered additional areas of concern within the company’s accounting practices. These suspicions include transactions between the physical and digital divisions of the group and expenses allegedly recorded outside the periods in which they occurred.

The primary issues remain the improper accounting of reverse factoring operations (a form of supplier financing) and the misuse of cooperative advertising funds (VPC), including falsified contracts. However, the committee indicates that other areas require further investigation.

During the investigation, “potential inconsistencies” were noted in transactions between Lojas Americanas and B2W, the group’s digital arm before their merger. The committee also found evidence of expense deferrals and pursuing “unsubstantiated services” to artificially enhance the company’s results.

The independent committee presented its findings—in a report reviewed by Valor—to the retailer’s board of directors in mid-July. Americanas’s accounting inconsistencies, initially unveiled in January 2023, amount to over R$25 billion.

The committee found documents indicating communication among B2W employees referencing “risks” associated with related-party transactions, such as cash outflows from Lojas Americanas and inflows to B2W. Investigators recommend examining potential fictitious merchandise transfers and sales between the companies.

Financial statements and reference forms from Lojas Americanas and B2W reveal numerous joint transactions, including shared expenses for the same headquarters, sales between the companies, and private issuances from B2W subscribed by Lojas Americanas.

The committee’s data collection also uncovered notes from an executive regarding potentially deferred expenses (recorded after they occurred) and the pursuit of “unsubstantiated services” to enhance results at Lojas Americanas and Americanas (formed in 2021 through the merger of the group’s digital and physical branches). The report does not specify the time frame or individuals involved.

Additional “levers” to improve results were identified, without assurance of the absence of irregularities in the corresponding adjustments. Possible risks in B2W’s operations include cashback programs (partial purchase refunds as discounts to customers), taxes, expense reversals, reclassifications between costs and expenses, and freight provision accounts.

Another area of concern involves the “MP do Bem”—a presidential decree enacted into law in 2005, which regulated tax incentives for IT products. Details on this issue were not provided.

Similar aspects are highlighted in Lojas Americanas’s business (deferred expenses, depreciation, reclassifications, taxes, and freight). Further investigation is again recommended.

The report suggests possible reclassifications of values between balance sheet lines and the results of Lojas Americanas and B2W, such as in inventory balances and deposits in court for liability accounts.

The committee identified communications among employees discussing potential adjustments in provisions for inventory obsolescence and stock for Americanas.

In reverse factoring operations, analyzed materials suggest that the company reimbursed suppliers for the discount rate charged by banks on the factoring of receivables.

The reimbursements reached “predominant” levels, both in value and volume, according to the report, and were not fully recorded as financial expenses in the financial statements. The investigation found R$3.4 billion in unrecorded financial expenses related to reimbursements up to September 30, 2022.

The reverse factoring agreements mostly involved overdue product purchase invoices, which theoretically would not qualify for advances. The investigations do not indicate supplier involvement in this scheme, nor that they were aware of it.

Two suppliers still working with Americanas claim that overdue invoice reverse factoring was primarily a B2W practice. “They delayed payments and everyone knew selling to them meant waiting a long time to get paid. To compensate, they bought in large volumes and also reimbursed part or all of the reverse factoring discount rate,” says the general counsel of a manufacturer selling to the website.

According to her, invoice payments were blocked, suppliers pressured, and payment was released through reverse factoring with a discount rate refund. “You want to get paid, so you accept the terms, but it was suspicious. The market questioned why they carried this financial expense. Today we know the expense wasn’t fully recorded.”

A second supplier states that B2W delayed invoices but purchased 10% to 15% more than other retailers on average.

The documents reveal an internal classification of these transactions as “good” or “bad” for monitoring by the former executives, currently under investigation, considering their financial outcome.

A “good” transaction had a “positive spread,” resulting in financial income or extended payment terms without recording reimbursement financial expenses. A “bad” operation with a “negative spread” led to expense payment.

When contacted, Americanas stated that “all recommendations made by the independent committee have already been thoroughly investigated, analyzed, and reflected in the presented financial statements.”

“The company emphasizes that the committee’s findings confirm, through independent means, what has been disclosed in the criminal investigation so far. It reaffirms its primary interest in clarifying the facts and pursuing legal accountability for all involved,” the company said.

By Adriana Mattos, Talita Moreira, Nelson Niero — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Sports betting sites that have not registered will be taken down in the coming days

10/02/2024

Government releases list of 192 authorized betting platforms
Government releases list of 192 authorized betting platforms — Photo: Pixabay

The Ministry of Finance released on Tuesday a list of online betting companies authorized to operate in Brazil. Nationwide, 89 companies, owning 192 platforms, have applied for approval from the ministry to operate in the country and are thus in compliance. The government also disclosed the names of six companies registered regionally, with states, each one responsible for a single website. Of these, five are from Paraná and one from Maranhão.

These companies will be authorized to operate in Brazil until December 31. At the end of this transition period, the Ministry of Finance will release the final list of companies and websites that will be authorized to operate from January 1, 2025, when Brazil’s regulated betting market will commence.

The ministry said that websites not included in the list can no longer accept bets. These sites will remain online for the next ten days “solely to facilitate bettors’ requests for the return of funds deposited in their names with these companies,” according to an official statement.

The announcement also said that, from October 11, these sites will begin to be taken down with the assistance of telecoms regulator ANATEL. “Even after this date, it will remain the responsibility of the website operators to ensure that bettors can withdraw any deposits they are entitled to,” the statement said.

The list was published after a day of meetings at the ministry’s headquarters in Brasília. In the morning, Minister Fernando Haddad met with representatives from the advertising sector to align guidelines for betting site advertisements.

According to Mr. Haddad, it’s important to be mindful of the negative effects that can be caused by sports betting and to address the issue from a social perspective. “No one makes money from gambling. People lose money. It’s a game of chance,” the minister said on Tuesday.

After the meeting at the Ministry of Finance, the president of the National Council for Advertising Self-Regulation (CONAR), Sérgio Pompilio, said that, in cooperation with the government and the advertising market, they will guide betting platforms towards “more controlled and healthier practices” for consumers.

Mr. Pompilio also said that Conar has been holding meetings with betting associations for almost a year. “Conar’s self-regulation principles are already part of the addendum [to the ministry’s decree] addressing advertising and are already in effect,” he said.

He added that the regulation of the sector—a process that began last year with the introduction of a bill on the subject—is “fundamental.”

Sports betting platforms began to be legalized in 2018, but the regulation process has been delayed. Last year, Congress passed a bill to regulate the sector. Throughout this year, the Ministry of Finance issued decrees detailing these rules. The process is expected to be completed next year.

Last week, a study by the Central Bank revealed that Brazilians spend between R$18 billion and R$21 billion per month on sports betting. The discovery of the market’s size has reinforced discussions on enhancing regulation, which also focuses on combating the use of platforms for illegal activities, such as money laundering.

The National Association of Games and Lotteries also advocated for regulation and announced measures to combat gambling addiction on illegal betting websites. “Legalization is the way forward, there’s no turning back. It’s the illegal sector that’s causing this mess and generating insecurity in the market,” said Plinio Lemos Jorge, president of the association.

In partnership with the institutes Somente and Belezinha, the association has started offering medical treatment for people addicted to gambling, a disorder known as ludopathy. The pilot project is expected to assist 21,000 people.

On another front, part of the regulation process is facing legal challenges. The Rio de Janeiro State Lottery (LOTERJ) obtained an injunction from a federal court to ensure that its licensed betting websites continue to operate and are free to advertise throughout the country, without the risk of being blocked.

In practice, companies licensed by LOTERJ will continue to operate nationwide—there will be no restriction if a player from Rio de Janeiro, for example, is traveling and places a bet in another state. LOTERJ-licensed companies will also not be blocked even if they are not authorized by the Ministry of Finance’s Secretariat of Prizes and Betting. The federal government is seeking to overturn the ruling in court.

See the list of authorized sites

Authorized websites
Betano
Superbet
Magicjackpot
Luckydays
ReidoPitaco
Sportingbet
Betboo
Caesar’s
JogaBet
Betnacional
Mr. Jack Bet
Pagbet
KTO
Betsson
Galera Bet
SportyBet
EstrelaBet
Betfair
PokerStars
7 Games
Betao
R7
Novibet
SeguroBet
ijogo
fogo777
p9
9f
6r
bet.app
Bet365
Aposta Ganha
Brazino777
Betway
Jackpot City
Spin Palace
SeuBet
H2 Bet
Vbet
Vivaro
Casa de Apostas
Bet Sul
BetFast
Faz1bet
Tivobet
SupremaBet
MaximaBet
XPGames
Betesporte
Lance de Sorte
King Panda
Leo Vegas
Royal Panda
Betspeed
Sorte online
Lottoland
ArenaPlus
PixBet
FlaBet
BetdaSorte
Rio Jogos
LottoMaster
betagora
Playpix
Dupoc
Apostou
b1.bet
BRBET
Bet Gorillas
BateuBet
Bet Warrior
pimile
Sorte na Bet
Bet Fusion
Bandbet
vivasorte
Afun
Blaze
JonBet
Bet7k
Cassino Pix
Bet Vera
Cbet
Vertbet
Dashboard Fund
UPBETBR
9d
Wjcasino
Betmotion
Apostou Ganhou
Alfa.bet
MMABet
BR4Bet
GoldeBet
lotogreen
Bolsa de Aposta
Fullbet
BetBra
Pinnacle
MatchBook
Verdinha
betboom
BetFive
IO
B2X
JetBet
SorteBet
Pinbet
Aposta 1
Apostamax
InplayBet
GingaBet
QGBet
Bacana Play
Play Uzu
BetCopa
Aposta365
multibet
acelerabet
Play7
Zedocash
Bankbet
Amabet
BetFortuna
Fortuna Play
LampionsBet
Responsa
Joga Limpo
Odd Fair
Única Bet
Bicho no Pix
Claro Bet
FazoBetAí
oleybet
betpark
Meridianbet
NossaBet
Spin365
Mundifortuna
MetBet
EsportivaBet
MetGol 100%
Tropino
Anima Bet
Esporte 365
Bet Aki
Jogo de Ouro
GeralBet
Betinha
Zona de Jogo
ApostaOnline
OnlyBets
Logame
LogFlix
Liderbet
Bullsbet
Elisa.bet
Pagamentos.bet
Lotoaposta
Davbet
playbonds
Bet.bet
1xBet
1xcassinos
Apuesta360
Rivalo
A247
Receba.com
Latinbet
Lumosbet
MC Games
MonteCarlosbet
MonteCarlos
Betmillion
ApostaTudo
Betsat
Zbet
Xbet
Kbet
PUSKÁS BET
Cibet
Big Win Free
GRXBet
BRX Gaming
Ricobet
Parimatch
Megaposta
Betex
Lanistar
Marjosports
Hanzbet
Chegou Bet
By Guilherme Pimenta, Gabriela Pereira, Flávia Maia, Helena Benfica, Valor — Brasília and São Paulo

Fonte: Ministry of Finance

https://valorinternational.globo.com/business/news/2024/10/02/government-releases-list-of-192-authorized-betting-platforms.ghtml
The new company, Reinvent, is the first in Brazil to blend human expertise with artificial intelligence, leveraging AI for operational and supporting functions

10/02/2024


Laio Santos — Foto: Divulgação
Laio Santos — Photo: Divulgação

Laio Santos, former CEO of brokerage firm Rico and ex-partner at XP Investimentos, is launching a wealth management firm targeting mid-ticket investors—those he believes are currently underserved by high-income segments of banks and digital platforms but do not yet have the volume for private banking. With this goal in mind, Mr. Santos, along with two other partners—Luis Souza and Heucles Bianco, both also former XP executives—turned to generative artificial intelligence as a way to scale the business without compromising service quality.

Named Reinvent, the asset manager is the first in Brazil to combine human expertise with artificial intelligence, which is used for operational and complementary functions such as portfolio monitoring, back-office operations, and client support, Mr. Santos said.

“AI is used to ensure that the time an advisor spends with a client is as well-utilized as possible. Human interaction is still necessary. If we were just AI, a chatbot, or an avatar, the client would probably invest R$1,000 to test it out. Most people today don’t want to deal with a ‘robo-advisor’ offering a portfolio that doesn’t match their needs just because they fit a certain profile. Clients want quality service,” he said.

The business model follows that of wealth management firms, charging a flat management fee of 0.7% on client assets. The minimum investment is R$100,000. The firm does not work with rebates or commissions for product distribution. “We don’t pretend we aren’t charging fees. Clients know exactly what they are paying,” Mr. Santos explained.

Reinvent is initially connected with XP, and the team is currently integrating BTG Pactual as well. Looking ahead, they aim to work with products from Nubank and Itaú. “We’re open. We have no exclusivity or ties to any one institution. This is important because it allows us to choose the best institution for the client’s needs, rather than the one we have a better relationship with,” Mr. Santos said.

The generative AI technology monitors everything happening in the markets 24/7, a pace that human advisors struggle to keep up with. With this information on hand, the AI can compare it to the client’s portfolio and goals. “This enables us to be proactive, knowing what’s happening before the client even notices an issue or opportunity.”

After leaving XP, Mr. Santos took a year off, fulfilling his non-compete agreement and exploring his next move in the financial market. He shared that at Rico, where he was CEO for three years, he had a team of 20 advisors managing a portfolio of 1 million clients. “The challenge was always figuring out how 20 people could make a difference in the lives of 1 million investors,” he said.

In the investment market, Mr. Santos explained, it’s difficult for an advisor to provide quality service to more than 80 clients. “It’s widely accepted that it’s economically unfeasible to personally manage clients with assets between R$100,000 and R$500,000. That’s just how the market works. But these clients are already receiving excellent service in other areas—they drink fine wine, go to great restaurants … yet in the investment market, they are still underserved.”

Mr. Santos believes that technology is now making it possible to expand service capacity. The estimate is that advisors can save at least three hours of operational work per day using AI. For example, while onboarding with a traditional advisor takes 120 minutes, with AI it can capture the essential information in just 20 minutes.

The firm caught the attention of venture capital investors like Canary, which led a R$5 million seed round along with angel investors from the financial market.

By Toni Sciarretta — São Paulo

Source: Valor Iternational

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Belgian Company, controlled by France’s Avril, cut the deal for an undisclosed amount

10/01/2024 01:47 PM  Atualizado 01/10/2024


Oleon, a Belgian subsidiary of the French group Avril and a global leader in natural-based oleochemicals, has finalized the purchase of Brazil’s A. Azevedo Oils, a prominent manufacturer of vegetable oils and its products—particularly those derived from castor beans. The companies did not disclose the transaction amount but noted that the family that previously owned A. Azevedo will retain a significant minority stake.

This acquisition marks Oleon’s entry into the Brazilian market, aligning with its strategy for global expansion and sustainable growth. A. Azevedo, which was advised by IGC Partners during the sale process, has an annual revenue of $80 million and employs 250 people. It will now be part of a company that generates €1 billion annually, with 1,200 employees and manufacturing facilities in seven countries, including Brazil.

The Brazilian company can produce 75,000 tonnes of vegetable oils per year, primarily from palm, soy, and especially castor beans. Its products serve as raw materials for cosmetics, packaging, fertilizers, cleaning products, and paints. Some of its production, carried out in its 30,000-square meter industrial facility in Itupeva, São Paulo, is already exported to the United States, France, and Latin American countries such as Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Peru.

Oleon CEO Moussa Naciri said the acquisition gives Oleon access to the South American market, while the Brazilian company gains the opportunity to enter new markets.

“We can use A. Azevedo as a platform to develop Oleon in South America. And we can leverage Oleon to enable A. Azevedo to grow internationally,” Mr. Naciri said, adding that products related to the castor bean supply chain are “extremely important” in various applications.

Mr. Naciri cited examples such as automotive oils used in several vehicles in Europe, as well as pharmaceutical and cosmetic products. “We take these natural materials and transform them into high-value solutions,” he said, adding that while environmental discussions are relevant, Oleon’s products are competitive without subsidies. “We are in the market not just because we are green. We are there because we provide functionalities that are crucial for the product,” he said.

The Avril group, which controls Oleon, is the fifth largest agricultural group in France, operating in 19 countries, with annual revenues of €8 billion and 8,000 employees. Avril CEO Jean-Phillippe Puig noted that the company is managed through a fund created by farmers who still control the company, aiming to increase the group’s annual earnings by €200 million by 2030.

*By Rafael Rosas — Rio de Janeiro

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
For asset managers, U.S. rate cuts and China’s stimulus package could lead to stock market recovery

10/01/2024


Marcelo Mello — Foto: Divulgação
Marcelo Mello — Photo: Divulgação

September felt like all of 2024 unfolded in a single month. It featured the expected rate cut by the U.S. Federal Reserve, a hike in Brazil’s Selic policy rate, and even stimulus measures for China’s economy. The renewed monetary tightening in Brazil kept fixed income in focus, making it the top performer for the month, with a CDI (Interbank Deposit Certificate) return of 0.84%. For the quarter, the rate stood at 2.63%. Meanwhile, after a strong August where Brazil’s benchmark stock index Ibovespa rose by 6.54%, it ended September down 3.08%, with a quarterly decline of 6.38%. The U.S. dollar declined by 3.30% against the real in September and 2.53% over the quarter.

“The best asset of the month was the CDI, outperforming the Ibovespa, real estate investment funds, and a basket of inflation-linked securities,” said Marcelo Mello, CEO of asset manager SulAmérica Vida, Previdência e Investimentos. He mentioned that fixed income attracted over R$43 billion in September, mainly into credit funds, while multimarket funds saw outflows of R$40 billion and equities lost R$2 billion. On the other hand, the pension funds segment gained R$4.5 billion.

Mr. Mello noted that both the rate cut in the U.S. and Brazil’s monetary tightening had been anticipated, with the key question being the pace. The Federal Reserve, he explained, started with a stronger approach, with its base rate potentially reaching 3.5% this year, while Brazil’s tightening began more cautiously, with a 25 basis-point hike but a tougher stance, leading the market to project 50 bp increases at each meeting. SulAmérica Vida expects the Selic rate to reach 12.5% per year by the end of the cycle.

“We began the year expecting more rate cuts in Brazil, which would have opened a window for IPOs, but the opposite happened,” Mr. Mello summarized. However, while the tighter monetary policy directly impacts Brazilian assets, it doesn’t rule out a stock market recovery. The monetary easing in the U.S. opens the door for a rebound, with the expected return of foreign investor inflows, along with the boost from China’s stimulus package. “China’s stimulus measures provide a lift to commodities, although it’s still uncertain if they’ll be enough,” Mr. Mello pointed out.

For Tiago Cunha, equity manager at Ace Capital, the domestic environment offers little incentive for riskier investments, and the government’s fiscal policy signals don’t inspire confidence. However, the external outlook—with moderate U.S. economic growth, falling interest rates, and China’s stimulus package—is starting to influence foreign investors’ portfolios.

“Everyone was expecting the Chinese stimulus package, but there was no clear indication of when it would happen, which is why all positions related to the country were at historic lows. Now we’re seeing a boost in these positions, especially through emerging markets funds, and Brazil ends up benefiting from this,” Mr. Cunha said.

Mr. Mello, of SulAmérica, noted that while equities aren’t very attractive to domestic institutional investors, he also sees international flows coming into emerging markets as U.S. rates fall. “For the stock market, what’s most relevant isn’t China, but U.S. rates,” he said. “Stocks are trading at a discount, and companies have been reporting satisfactory results. If the U.S. monetary policy direction is confirmed, we could see foreign inflows.”

Mr. Cunha, from Ace, also mentioned that foreign investors are puzzled by Brazil’s divergent path on interest rates compared to the rest of the world. “They struggle to understand, especially given that the inflation we’re trying to control isn’t far off target. It raises questions about how often the market consistently overestimates inflation and underestimates economic activity.”

For him, since the extent of the tightening cycle is unclear, it’s also impossible to predict when rate cuts will resume. “If it depends on anchoring expectations, there’s the additional challenge of aligning fiscal policy with this.” Amid all volatility in expectations, the IMA-B 5+ (an index reflecting the performance of government bonds indexed to the IPCA official inflation with maturities over five years) fell 1.42% in September, while the IMA-B 5 (up to five years) rose 0.4%. Over the quarter, the indexes saw gains of 2.55% and 1.92%, respectively.

In equities, indexes linked to domestic activity, given the forecast of a stronger Selic rate hike, fell more than the Ibovespa: the Small Caps index dropped 4.41%, and the Icon retail index declined 4.71%. “The economic data has been strong, and we want to be more optimistic, but we’re being cautious,” said Marcelo Nantes, head of equities at ASA.

Mr. Nantes recalled that August was a good month for stocks tied to the domestic economy, but the firm thought equities had risen too much and started September more cautiously. “New money for the stock market is coming from foreign investors because it’s very difficult for pension funds to invest with interest rates at this level. And retail investors are focusing on tax-exempt securities.”

He said that with the results of China’s stimulus package still unknown, the asset manager is “more in wait-and-see mode than willing to take a gamble,” which is why they kept a small exposure to commodities and reduced their position in companies tied to Brazil’s GDP. The healthcare sector, as well as shopping malls and retail in general, are part of this group. “We like these sectors and made only small adjustments. We also doubled the fund’s cash allocation.”

There were no changes in the electricity sector exposure, where they remained optimistic, and the telecommunications industry allocation grew. “China’s move has turned into a positive risk, and Brazilian activity remains strong, but the fiscal issue is the elephant in the room. If foreign flows return, we’ll revise our view.” At Ace, they maintain a bullish position on commodities while increasing their exposure to technology companies overseas.

The bet on Brazilian stocks isn’t significant at G5 Partners, said Fernando Donnay, partner and head of fund-of-funds at the multifamily office, with an allocation between 5% and 10%, considered neutral. The largest portion of its equity portfolio is invested overseas, where stocks may not be as cheap as in Brazil, but it focuses on global companies. On the other hand, in fixed income, the firm is reducing its allocation, as the risk premiums on private securities continue to shrink.

Mr. Mello, from SulAmérica, also pointed to the ongoing reduction in spreads as a challenge for credit allocations. He noted that some asset managers are starting to limit inflows into their funds to maintain portfolio quality, especially those with daily liquidity.

He believes that as these fundraising limits expand, the market will stabilize. SulAmérica itself has already closed its daily liquidity funds, and on platforms, they’re working to encourage funds with 60 and 90-day maturities, which allow for the pursuit of more competitive rates.

Gabriel Esteca, co-founder and head of infrastructure at Bocaina Capital, doesn’t foresee a change in the high demand for infrastructure bonds, which offer tax exemptions for individual investors. He has been targeting smaller issuances, up to R$100 million, which the firm originates to secure higher rates. “There’s no visible trigger in the short term due to the high demand for credit.”

*By Liane Thedim — Rio de Janeiro

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
While many firms refinanced debt during lower spreads, several sectors remain highly leveraged

10/01/2024


Vivian Lee — Foto: Carol Carquejeiro/Valor
Vivian Lee — Photo: Carol Carquejeiro/Valor

The ongoing Selic benchmark interest rate hike, which began in September, is expected to impact the financial performance of companies raising funds through the debt market, particularly those in highly leveraged sectors such as retail, car rentals, and healthcare. However, the fallout is likely to be less severe than in 2021, when the rapid increase in Brazil’s policy interest rate to 13.75% from 2% over just a year strained these companies’ ability to manage their debt costs. This time, many firms acted preemptively, capitalizing on strong demand for bonds to refinance at lower spreads and extended maturities.

“Some companies that access capital markets have issued new debt, allowing them to swap higher-cost obligations for lower spreads and longer terms, reducing short-term rollover risks,” explains Vivian Lee, partner and manager at Ibiuna. “But for those already facing liquidity pressures, the rate increase is anything but trivial.”

A report from the SWM Group obtained by Valor highlights that certain cyclical sectors, such as car rentals, food and textile retailers, and healthcare providers are in a more precarious leverage position. “With the rise in the Selic rate, these companies are seeing either an increase or, at best, stabilization of leverage due to higher financial costs,” says Odilon Costa, SWM’s fixed income and corporate debt strategist. “Investors need to be cautious, as the credit fundamentals of some issuers have become more concerning. The risk-return balance of these assets deserves closer attention.”

Mr. Costa notes that rental companies are facing heightened leverage due to a combination of fleet maintenance and expansion needs, coupled with a decline in used vehicle prices. Meanwhile, food and textile retailers have benefited from more robust consumer spending but are still grappling with tight credit conditions and stiffer competition. For healthcare companies, including hospitals and laboratories, costs have eased somewhat, though payment delays from operators remain a significant challenge, according to the SWM report.

With profit margins as low as 5% to 10% and high levels of debt, any increase in the Selic rate could significantly erode companies’ net results, says Rosana Pádua, board member of the Brazilian Institute of Finance Executives of São Paulo (IBEF-SP). “In some cases, companies don’t even have enough margin to service their debt. That’s why many have struggled since rates increased and have filed for court-supervised reorganization.”

From the funding perspective, the latest Selic adjustment to 10.75% per year from 10.5% hasn’t impacted companies’ decisions to issue bonds. According to Miguel Diaz, Santander’s capital markets specialist, firms generally focus more on the spread they’ll pay investors rather than the total financial cost.

“The spread is the main criterion for deciding whether to move forward. It’s different from the bond market, where the emphasis is on the overall cost of financing,” he explains. Mr. Diaz adds that the rate hike could even lead to an increase in available resources for funds.

Vivian Lee from Ibiuna Capital agrees that if interest rates continue to rise as expected, the flow of funds to corporate debt investments is unlikely to be affected. However, if the Selic climbs above 14% per year, individual investors may shift their capital toward more liquid options like CDBs from large banks or government bonds. “At that point, the impact on companies’ financial expenses will be much greater, and credit risk will rise,” she cautions, noting that Ibiuna’s baseline scenario does not currently foresee a Selic rate reaching 14%.

The previous rate hike cycle, which began in 2021, hit Brazilian companies hard. Many had taken advantage of the 2% Selic rate to increase their debt, aiming to finance post-pandemic expansion. However, deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, rising commodity prices, and the devaluation of the real led the Central Bank to sharply raise the Selic rate, peaking at 13.75% in August 2022, the highest since 2016.

This time around, if interest rates climb too much, the benefits of issuing debt at lower rates earlier this year could be wiped out, says Mr. Costa. “The effort to reduce spreads may be negated by a rise in the CDI (interbank short-term rate),” he notes. “At the beginning of the year, the premium on the most liquid debentures dropped from CDI plus 2.3% to CDI plus 1.6%, a 70-basis-point reduction. But if the Selic rises by 150 basis points, the nominal cost of debt will climb much higher.”

Last week’s Focus Bulletin projected the Selic rate to be 11.5% by the end of the year. However, after the Central Bank’s Inflation Report, some market players began betting on a more aggressive rate hike to keep inflation within target, with some institutions forecasting a 12.5% rate at the peak of the tightening cycle. In the latest Focus report, the median expectation edged up to 11.75%.

*By Rita Azevedo — São Paulo

Source: Valor Internatinal

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Credit rating agency says that if fiscal performance is weak during strong economic growth, it may deteriorate further during an unexpected slowdown

09/27/2024


Shelly Shetty — Foto: Claudio Belli/Valor
Shelly Shetty — Photo: Claudio Belli/Valor

Despite Brazil’s surprising economic growth this year, the country’s fiscal performance has been “weaker than anticipated,” maintaining high uncertainty regarding public finances, according to Fitch Ratings. “Economic outperformance may partly result from the loose fiscal position. If fiscal performance is weak when growth is strong, it could deteriorate further in an unexpected slowdown. Uncertain consolidation prospects are therefore a key macroeconomic vulnerability constraining Brazil’s ‘BB’/Stable sovereign rating.”

In a commentary released Thursday, signed by analysts Todd Martinez, Shelly Shetty, and Mark Brown, Fitch noted that the Lula administration is aiming for gradual fiscal consolidation after allowing the deficit to increase last year to accommodate a rise in social spending. However, the analysts pointed out that the government faces challenges both in significantly boosting revenues and in controlling expenditures.

The agency highlighted that the government projects a primary deficit of 0.6% of GDP this year, which would be the maximum allowed under the fiscal framework and zero-deficit target, with a tolerance range of plus or minus 0.25% of GDP. However, this projection does not account for certain expenses, such as those related to flooding in Rio Grande do Sul. Fitch stated that it expects the government to achieve this target, “but it would not be an auspicious start to the consolidation process.”

Fitch analysts emphasized that the main revenue-enhancing measures are either temporary or have uncertain outcomes, specifically mentioning revenues from dispute settlements under the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CARF). Moreover, they regarded the government’s contemplated measures to offset revenue shortfalls, such as using idle bank deposits and increasing dividends from the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES), as “improvisational measures.” “Such improvisational measures show a commitment to fiscal targets but do not offer structural fiscal improvements,” the agency said.

Meanwhile, Fitch noted that controlling expenditures has proven to be a “challenging” process, particularly with higher-than-expected pension costs. Additionally, the agency warned that indexing and tying expenditures to specific revenues would “keep pressure on social expenditures in the next few years, requiring a further squeeze of discretionary spending to compensate that could eventually become unviable.” Thus, the agency acknowledged the government’s initiative to combat fraud in social programs but stressed that “political appetite for changes that deliver major relief remains unclear.”

In its updated projections, Fitch now expects a 2.8% growth rate for this year. Regarding public finances, the agency predicts a primary deficit of 1% of GDP in 2025, higher than the previous forecast of 0.7%. “This would exceed the maximum 0.6% allowed by the fiscal rule,” it warned. Furthermore, interest costs are expected to rise due to the Central Bank initiating a mini-cycle of monetary tightening. “This will lift interest payments immediately, given a high share (45%) of floating-rate debt.”

Fitch forecasts that economic growth will slow to 2% starting in 2025. In this context, the agency projects that debt will reach 77.8% of GDP this year and 83.9% of GDP by 2026. “This is faster than previously forecast, widening the gap to the ‘BB’ category median of 55%,” the Fitch analysts remarked.

*By Victor Rezende, Valor — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
With stock prices below “fair” value, firms launched 53 buyback programs from January to August, compared to 35 last year

09/27/2024


Marcelo Bacci — Foto: Gabriel Reis/Valor
Marcelo Bacci — Photo: Gabriel Reis/Valor

Publicly traded companies are capitalizing on a lackluster year in the capital markets by launching share buyback programs, seizing the opportunity to repurchase shares they believe are undervalued. From January to August, 53 buyback programs were announced, surpassing last year’s total of 35.

Some prominent examples include pulp producer Suzano, construction company Moura Dubeux, and logistics warehouse provider Log Commercial Properties, which have all initiated buyback operations since January. These buybacks range from 500,000 to 200 million shares, collectively amounting to 1.2 billion shares—50% more than in 2023.

The reasons behind these buybacks vary. Companies often cancel repurchased shares, which benefits shareholders by dividing capital among fewer outstanding shares. This move signals to the market that the company believes its stock is undervalued, potentially boosting its price. Additionally, repurchased shares can be allocated for executive and employee compensation programs.

Most companies fund these buybacks using their own cash reserves. In this model, they set a share repurchase limit for a specific period, hire brokers to place purchase orders based on market conditions, and settle the payment within days of the transaction.

However, some companies opt for a financial tool called a “total return swap.” This derivative contract allows a company to trade shares for credit at a future interest rate. In this arrangement, the company partners with a bank that agrees to purchase the shares in the market and charges interest for the service. These contracts typically last 12 to 18 months.

Companies and banks sometimes agree to periodically assess the stock’s performance on the exchange. If the stock price drops, the company compensates the bank for the difference. If the stock rises, the bank transfers the gains to the company minus the interest on the transaction. Additionally, any dividends paid during this period are passed from the bank to the company.

Eric Altafim, director of corporate products at Itaú, estimates that the number of these derivative deals could reach around 100 this year. “It’s become quite common for companies to enter into these contracts,” he notes. “Most prefer traditional buyback operations, but some use derivatives.”

According to his calculations, large-scale operations in this category are relatively few. “The volume tends to be smaller, likely in the dozens rather than hundreds,” he explains. “There are probably around ten larger-scale operations.”

For financial institutions, the benefit comes from the interest they receive on these transactions. One of the main advantages for companies is that they can execute buybacks without tapping into their cash reserves. They also gain the flexibility to trade shares without needing to adhere to a blackout period, such as when preparing to release earnings results.

Earlier this month, shopping center operator Iguatemi announced it was “nearing the end of the settlement period for the total return equity swap contracts” under its fourth buyback program, approved in March 2023, and had initiated its fifth program as approved by its board of directors.

According to the company’s statement, contracts for Iguatemi’s fifth buyback program could total up to R$120 million. When contacted, Iguatemi declined to provide further details beyond the information disclosed to the market.

Having just completed one share buyback program, Log Commercial Properties is now launching another. In its first program, announced on July 5, the company repurchased 10% of its 5.5 million shares on the market, investing R$240 million from its own cash reserves.

“We considered the ‘total return swap’ option but ultimately decided against it,” says André Vitória, Log’s chief investor relations officer. He explained that with a “comfortable cash position” of around R$900 million to R$1 billion, there was no need to employ a derivative instrument. “Every operation like this comes with a cost, and we preferred to use our cash rather than leave money on the table for the banks,” he added.

Marcelo Bacci, chairman of the board at the Brazilian Institute of Finance Executives (IBEF), explains, “The logic behind these operations is often driven by companies that don’t have cash on hand but see an opportunity to capitalize on the depreciated value of their shares, creating value for shareholders.” According to Mr. Bacci, using derivatives allows companies to preserve cash for other strategic purposes, such as investments or acquisitions.

At Suzano, where Marcelo Bacci serves as vice president of finance, investor relations, and legal, the company views share buybacks as “a good investment for the company’s resources.” “Our shares have been trading at the same level for two years,” Mr. Bacci explains.

Suzano launched a new buyback program on August 9, and on the same day, its shares rose 1.68% to R$54.50. Earlier this year, Suzano’s stock was priced at R$55.14, but it hit a low of R$46.64 on June 5, marking a 15% decline. Despite having a buyback program in place during this period, the stock has not fully recovered to its early 2024 levels. However, investment analysts still view the stock as undervalued, estimating its fair price within 12 months to be between R$70 and R$80.

Construction company Moura Dubeux, which focuses on middle- and high-income real estate in the Northeast and raised R$1 billion in its 2020 IPO, is also engaging in share buybacks. According to Diogo Barral, chief investor relations officer, the company is now in its third buyback program. It repurchased 10% of the available shares in its first round, followed by 5% in the second program. “Now, with the third program, we’re set to buy back 1% of the shares,” Mr. Barral says.

Of that 1%, 80% to 85% will be allocated to the company’s executive compensation program. The company has yet to decide the fate of shares from previous buybacks, which could either be canceled or used in future rewards programs. “Our shares are trading below their equity value,” Mr. Barral notes. Moura Dubeux is funding the buyback using its own cash reserves. “It’s worth it. Over the past two years, our stock has risen by 120% to 130%,” the executive adds.

*By Nelson Rocco, Rita Azevedo — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
The report reveals strong economic activity and inflation above target until 2027

09/27/2024


Marcelo Fonseca — Foto: Divulgação
Marcelo Fonseca — Photo: Divulgação

The Central Bank’s inflation projections, which remain above the target throughout the forecast horizon, as highlighted in the Inflation Report released on Thursday, have strengthened expectations of further tightening the Selic rate in the coming months. Financial institutions are now adjusting their forecasts to reflect a higher policy rate.

However, Central Bank President Roberto Campos Neto avoided signaling future moves, emphasizing a “data-dependent” approach. “We need more data and more time to understand how [the cycle] will proceed,” he said.

Since the Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (COPOM) began its rate-hike cycle last week and the minutes released on Tuesday (24) echoed the same hawkish tone, the Inflation Report has been perceived as another firm signal from the monetary authority.

The report shows that inflation projections fail to return to the target in any timeframe. The Central Bank estimates the 2024 IPCA at 4.3%, with inflation at 3.7% in 2025. In the first two quarters of 2026—key periods in the relevant monetary policy horizon—inflation is forecast at 3.5%. Even in the first quarter of 2027, the most distant projection, inflation stands at 3.2%, still above the 3% target pursued by the COPOM.

“The Central Bank anticipates the need for restrictive monetary conditions until at least the end of 2026, and the market’s reference trajectory for the Selic policy rate and the real do not align with inflation projections meeting the 3% target over the next two and a half years,” said Alberto Ramos, head of macroeconomic research for Latin America at Goldman Sachs.

The COPOM revised its output gap projections, a measure of economic slack. The indicator is now estimated at 0.5% for the second and third quarters of 2024, up from 0% to 0.2% in the previous report. For the fourth quarter of 2024, the output gap is projected at 0.3%, down from 0.4%. Looking ahead to the first quarter of 2026, the estimate remains at 0.3%.

The data presented in the report has led many financial institutions to conclude that the Selic rate may need to be higher than the 11.5% projected in the Focus Report to bring inflation back to target. Throughout the day, some institutions, including BTG Pactual, began expecting a Selic rate of 12.5% by the end of the tightening cycle.

BTG now foresees three consecutive hikes of 50 basis points in November, December, and January, followed by a final 25-basis-point increase in March.

In a note from BTG’s chief economist for Brazil, Claudio Ferraz, the bank pointed out that the Inflation Report data sends a “hawkish” message, reinforcing COPOM’s communication since last week’s meeting.

BTG highlighted the “substantial revision” in 2024 economic growth projections and noted that the output gap has moved into positive territory. Despite this, the inflation projection for the second quarter of 2026, just after the COPOM’s relevant monetary policy horizon, still shows a high Extended Consumer Price Index (IPCA) of 3.5%.

“The September communication shows that the COPOM acknowledged stronger-than-expected economic activity and sees a more challenging process in converging inflation to the target, citing upward asymmetry in its balance of risks,” the economists added.

The Buysidebrazil consultancy, founded and led by economist Andrea Damico, mapped a similar trajectory for the Selic rate after the release of the Inflation Report. The firm highlighted that the revision of the output gap adds 35 basis points to inflation by the end of the first quarter of 2026, which falls within the relevant horizon for monetary policy. According to their calculations, this increase is partially offset by the higher interest rate outlook, which reduces the inflation projection by 25 basis points.

Marcelo Fonseca, chief economist at Reag Investimentos, noted that the Inflation Report did not introduce any new information beyond what was outlined in the statement and minutes of the last COPOM meeting. Still, it implicitly suggests that the Central Bank will accelerate the Selic rate hike to 50 basis points starting in November, Mr. Fonseca said.

“The Central Bank is clearly committed to ensuring inflation convergence, and to achieve that, it will need to deliver a longer tightening cycle than most analysts and the market initially anticipated,” explained Mr. Fonseca, whose projection is also for the Selic rate to reach 12.5%, with the cycle concluding in March. Reag revised its forecast shortly after the previous COPOM meeting.

While the COPOM started the current tightening cycle with a more modest 25-basis-point increase, Mr. Fonseca believes this decision was specific to the context of the September meeting.

During a recent interview, Mr. Campos Neto clarified that no discussion took place regarding a more aggressive 50-basis-point hike in week three of September. “Had a group considered a 50-basis-point increase, we would have noted it in the minutes. Since it’s not there, that debate didn’t happen,” Mr. Campos Neto explained.

When asked about the recent IPCA figures, Mr. Campos Neto acknowledged some qualitatively better signs, reiterating his previous comment that short-term inflation could be “a little better.” However, he also expressed concerns over future price dynamics, particularly food prices related to ongoing drought conditions. Brazil’s mid-September inflation index IPCA-15—known as a reliable predictor for official inflation—showed a 0.13% increase in September, significantly below market expectations.

The release of the Inflation Report notably impacted the interest rate market, especially for intermediate-term contracts. By the end of the session, the January 2026 DI rate rose from 12.085% to 12.20%, while the January 2027 DI increased from 12.11% to 12.245%.

Based on the yield curve, projections now indicate that the Selic rate could reach 12.75% by 2025.

Regarding market reactions, Mr. Campos Neto stated it is not the Central Bank’s role to “keep commenting on whether we agree or disagree with the market,” after being questioned about his earlier remarks concerning a potential overreaction in risk premiums.

By Gabriel Roca, Gabriel Caldeira, Anaïs Fernandes, Gabriel Shinohara, Alex Ribeiro, Victor Rezende, Estevão Taiar — São Paulo and Brasília*

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/