The rapid expansion of Brazil’s agribusiness over the past 50 years has largely been driven by the “tropicalization” of technologies—adapting crops and techniques developed for colder climates to the country’s tropical conditions. Now, a company in the sector is betting on the reverse path: exporting Brazilian expertise to U.S. farmland.

IBRA Megalab, a Brazilian soil analysis laboratory, is investing R$5 million in a technology transfer program to operate in U.S. agriculture. So far, the funds have been allocated to developing and validating methodologies to assess U.S. soil types, as well as to institutional outreach and market prospecting.

According to Armando Saretta Parducci, director at IBRA Megalab, the group’s ambitions go further. By 2030, the goal is to establish a soil analysis laboratory in the United States. “That will happen once we define a primary region to operate in and move forward with a structural investment,” he said.

The main attraction of entering the U.S. market is its scale. According to IBRA, the U.S. soil analysis market reached $800 million in 2025—up to five times larger than Brazil’s. “It’s a huge opportunity that we’ve identified,” Parducci said.

He noted that Brazil’s experience with low-fertility soils has generated technical expertise that can help address emerging agricultural challenges, including boosting productivity, improving fertilizer efficiency, and measuring soil carbon.

“There is growing interest in more advanced soil diagnostics technologies, especially those that integrate laboratory analysis with digital agriculture, soil mapping, and carbon-related metrics,” he said.

Several pilot projects are already underway. One involves a farmer in Illinois who also operates in Brazil and is already an IBRA client in Luís Eduardo Magalhães, Bahia. Another project is being conducted in partnership with Agtegra, a cooperative based in North Dakota.

The laboratory has accessed 150,000 soil samples from the United States to develop analysis technologies tailored to the local market and its main crops.

“Our current focus is on market development and client acquisition. We plan to take part in industry events in the U.S. to showcase Brazilian technology, particularly in precision agriculture and soil carbon measurement,” Parducci said.

Founded in 1980 in Campinas, São Paulo, IBRA analyzes around 1 million soil samples per year, covering approximately 20 million hectares. The group also sees new opportunities in Brazil and is investing in expanding its domestic footprint.

It currently operates laboratories in Sumaré (São Paulo), Maringá (Paraná), Naviraí (Mato Grosso do Sul), Sorriso (Mato Grosso), and Luís Eduardo Magalhães (Bahia). A new unit is expected to open in Passo Fundo (Rio Grande do Sul) by the second half of the year, with an investment of R$3 million.

*By Marcelo Beledeli, Globo Rural — Porto Alegre

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

Economists are puzzled by the growing gap between Brazilians’ income, which keeps rising, and household consumption, flat in the last quarter of 2025.

Several explanations are on the table. A larger share of household income may be going to debt payments. Prices are still high. And wage income appears to be rising more because people who already have jobs are earning more, rather than because many new workers are entering the labor market.

That is unusual. For years, income and consumption tended to move in tandem: when households earned more, they spent more. Since the pandemic, that link has weakened, and the gap became much clearer in 2025.

“Up through 2023 and 2024, income and consumption were still broadly moving together. In 2025, that divergence became much more pronounced,” said Rodolfo Margato, an economist at XP. Yihao Lin of Genial Investimentos said the gap has started to look like a “crocodile mouth” opening wider, which he described as puzzling.

By Margato’s calculations, the Central Bank’s broad measure of gross disposable household income rose about 4.8% in real terms last year. XP’s own gauge of disposable household income from all sources showed a similar increase. Yet household consumption in GDP rose only 1.3% in 2025. “That result surprised us, given what our income proxy was signaling,” Margato said.

He points to another sign that something is off. XP uses a model to forecast consumption based on household disposable income, credit origination and consumer expectations from Getulio Vargas Foundation’s confidence index.

“Historically, this model has worked very well. As a rule of thumb, going back to the beginning of the century, about 70% of additional household income tends to flow into consumption. This model was pointing to consumption growth in GDP closer to 2%,” he said.

Instead, household consumption was flat in the fourth quarter of 2025 from the previous three months, after edging down 0.1% in the third quarter. The market had expected a 0.3% increase.

After that result, Genial, which had been looking for consumption growth of around 0.5%, revised its 2026 GDP forecast. “Our scenario for this year was heavily based on stronger household consumption. The labor market had been surprising, the wage bill was accelerating, and that gave us the impression consumption could be much stronger. That did not happen. The labor market alone no longer seems to be enough to drive it,” Lin said.

Wages rise, spending lags

Fernando Montero, chief economist at Tullett Prebon, notes that restricted household income has continued to rise as a share of GDP. Since the start of the Central Bank’s series in 2013, it has increased by 5.7 percentage points. That is not a record, but earlier peaks came either during the pandemic, when emergency aid was massive, or during the 2015-17 recession, when weak nominal GDP, rather than strong income, supported the ratio.

Breaking down the Central Bank figures into labor income, based on Brazil’s household employment survey, and primary transfers, Montero finds that labor income is up 1.8 percentage points over the series, while transfers have risen 3.9 points.

Over the past year and a half, though, transfers have been flat relative to GDP, while labor income has recovered ground lost during the pandemic, Montero said. Even so, consumption has not kept up. One possibility, he said, is that part of the extra post-pandemic income is being saved, mirroring lower public-sector savings.

Another possibility comes from credit data. Deteriorating indicators such as defaults, indebtedness and debt-service burdens may suggest that the additional income is being absorbed by interest payments, Montero said.

Santander sees the same tension. Real income is still growing at a strong 5% pace, which should normally translate into a clearer improvement in families’ sense of financial well-being, said Ana Paula Vescovi, chief economist at Santander Brasil. But total debt payments, including interest and amortization, are rising almost 12% in real terms. As a result, income left over after debt service is growing much more slowly, at just 2.4%.

Margato says there is still no strong macro evidence that households are channeling extra income into savings. “There has been more financial investment and more capital-market exposure among some groups, especially higher-income households. But from a macro standpoint, we do not see evidence of a broader increase in savings,” he said.

In his view, part of the gap between income and consumption can be explained by heavier debt burdens. “Looking more broadly, in an environment of restrictive interest rates and higher debt levels, we have seen a larger share of income being tied up, in other words, a more significant portion going to debt service,” he said.

The share of household income committed to debt service hit a record in the Central Bank series, which began in 2005, when it reached 29.3% in October last year. It was still 29.2% in December, the highest year-end reading on record, and returned to 29.3% in January.

Household indebtedness relative to income over the previous 12 months also ended 2025 at a yearly peak of 49.7%. On a monthly basis, that was second only to the 49.9% seen in July 2022.

“Even adjusting for delinquency, households are devoting a larger share of income to servicing debt and paying interest,” Margato said. “That is an important part of the explanation for slower consumption despite strong income gains. But it is only part of the story. It does not fully add up yet. There is still something here that we do not fully understand.”

Jobs weight

Montero points to another possible explanation: income has been rising less because more people are working and more because those already employed are earning higher wages.

“Each new source of income gives a household more confidence and gives banks more collateral. In that sense, a new income source is more than just additional income,” he said. “When someone gets a job, they gain access to credit.”

Citi Brasil raises a similar point. Its models suggest consumption is about three times more sensitive to job growth than to real wage gains. The bank’s team, led by Leonardo Porto, notes that household consumption rose 1% in the fourth quarter of 2025 from a year earlier, less than overall GDP growth of 1.8% and far less than the 6.4% increase in the total wage bill. In Citi’s view, that is because consumption responded more to the 1.1% rise in employment than to the 5% increase in wages themselves.

Lin also points to still-high prices, a source of discomfort captured in Genial/Quaest surveys. “That may be part of the reason consumption is not stronger. Inflation may be behaving better, but we are not talking about deflation. Prices have stopped accelerating, but there has been no real restoration of purchasing power since the end of the pandemic,” he said.

The accumulated hit to household budgets has come mainly from essentials such as electricity and food, he said. “There is no way around those expenses, and they squeeze disposable income. If you spend more on essentials, there is less left for discretionary consumption.”

Spending recover

Whatever is behind the gap between income and consumption, Montero says one question remains. If the sharp rise in household income is no longer enough to support both debt service and consumption because of the lagged effects of high interest rates, what happens when that income growth, heavily supported by a labor market with little autonomy of its own, another round of unsustainable fiscal stimulus and slower inflation, starts to lose momentum?

Margato believes household consumption can still pick up in 2026. “Our working assumption is that the gap between income and consumption narrows back toward its historical average,” he said.

That view rests on the resilience of both the labor market and credit, which he says was already visible in January data.

He also points to a package of government stimulus measures that should support demand in the near term. XP estimates that together they could add 0.9 percentage point to GDP. That estimate uses conservative assumptions, Margato said, such as R$15 billion in home-renovation credit, even though the government says as much as R$40 billion could be made available.

“There are arguments that the effect may be more limited precisely because households are more indebted and may also behave more cautiously in an election year, especially when it comes to durable goods. I understand those arguments. But we are still talking about an impact of nearly 1 percentage point of GDP, against the backdrop of a resilient labor market. Under those conditions, it is hard to see consumption not picking up again,” he said.

XP forecasts household consumption growth of 1.9% in 2026, close to its 2% forecast for overall GDP.

Genial is even more optimistic, projecting household consumption growth of 2.5% this year while also forecasting 2% GDP growth. Lin expects unemployment to move toward 6.1% by year-end, still well below the 7.7% “natural” unemployment rate his firm estimates for Brazil.

“We will still have a very tight labor market, and that will keep pressure on wages,” he said.

He expects the real wage bill to grow 4.5% on average in 2026, or 4.7% by year-end, equivalent to roughly 8.5% to 9% in nominal terms. “We are once again talking about a year of strong consumption growth, and that is one of the pillars of our economic scenario,” he said.

Even so, he acknowledges that the recent stagnation in household spending is a risk. “If consumption continues to show no reaction, especially with these stimulus measures and the higher minimum wage, and if that does not appear in first-quarter growth, we will inevitably have to revise our GDP forecast,” he said.

*By Anaïs Fernandes   — São Paulo

Source:Valor International
https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

 

The sharp rise in oil prices during the war in the Middle East did not translate evenly into share prices of oil companies listed in Brazil. Although Brent climbed nearly 62% in March, the effect on energy stocks in the Ibovespa benchmark index was mixed, reflecting differences in business models, exposure to international markets and the impact of government measures affecting crude exports and refining.

Companies more directly exposed to production and exports, such as Petrobras and Prio, showed a clearer link to the commodity, though far from a perfect one. Petrobras common shares rose about 26% last month, while Prio advanced 21%, according to Valor Data.

That said, Petrobras also benefited from the continued flow of foreign capital into emerging markets. Brava Energia and PetroReconcavo lagged behind, with gains of 10% and 13%, respectively, held back by different operating characteristics and lower direct sensitivity to the rise in international oil prices.

The divergence also reflects company-specific factors that go beyond Brent’s swings. In Prio’s case, for example, most of its revenue is tied to exports and oil prices, and the company also has its own catalysts drawing investor attention, said Caio Borges, an analyst at Eleven Financial.

One is the recently approved license for the Wahoo field, with initial production of 12,000 barrels a day and expected output of 40,000 barrels a day by the end of April.

Squeezed margins

Petrobras operates under a different logic from the other companies. A significant share of its revenue comes from refining, where margins do not always move in line with Brent. That is because the state-controlled company’s pricing policy takes other factors into account besides crude prices, which leads to less frequent adjustments.

“In practice, when Brent rises and oil products are not immediately repriced, refining margins get squeezed, which limits the positive effect of higher oil prices on the company’s performance,” Borges said.

Although optimistic about Prio’s production growth, Henrique Lara, a portfolio manager at Reach Capital, said the recent 12% tax on crude oil exports weighs on the company. The measure, adopted by the government to help fund subsidies and contain fuel prices, was introduced alongside a 50% tax on diesel exports.

Brava is also among the companies most affected, since it exports about 40% of its production. At the same time, the company has a hedging structure that significantly reduces gains generated by higher Brent prices, which helps explain its weaker stock performance.

Rethinking exposure

Even so, the outbreak of the conflict prompted local asset managers to reassess portfolio risk. Before the war, many firms had little appetite for oil exposure because the consensus view was that supply and demand would be out of sync as the market moved from the first to the second quarter. But the price surge led to a significant increase in allocations to oil producers.

At Reach Capital, exposure to the sector was tripled, though the firm did not disclose numbers. According to Lara, the firm already believed the conflict would last longer than the market was pricing in, even if the Strait of Hormuz, which handles about one-fifth of global oil flows, were reopened. For that reason, part of the portfolio was shifted into oil companies, though the portfolio remains diversified.

Lara cut positions more exposed to the economic cycle and increased exposure by 10% to global oil companies and international fertilizer producers.

“Even if the war ends, the geopolitical premium will remain and will not immediately return to zero. A meaningful volume of oil has been taken out of the market, and the alternatives to offset that loss are limited,” he said.

No simple pattern

A study by Quantum shared exclusively with Valor shows that Brent and Petrobras stock prices do not always behave in tandem during geopolitical conflicts. During the Arab Spring, Petrobras preferred shares tracked the rise in oil from December 2010 through April 2011, but that correlation broke down from then until 2013. During the Israel-Hamas conflict between 2023 and 2025, the pattern was different: oil fell while Petrobras shares rose.

That historical asymmetry helps explain the current backdrop. In 2026, oil remains volatile, reacting mainly to signals from Iran and the United States. Even so, the average price level is already above what had initially been expected for the period, even under a truce scenario, said Guto Leite, equity portfolio manager at Franklin Templeton.

So far this year, oil has averaged between $75 and $80 a barrel, about $10 above the firm’s prewar projections, when the market expected demand to slow. “That is positive for Petrobras and Prio. Even with oil at $70, the floor should be higher and the geopolitical premium is likely to last longer.”

Before the war, Leite had less exposure to oil companies than the market average. Today, the portfolio is more defensive, with positions in Prio and Petrobras and reduced exposure to assets more sensitive to the economic cycle.

“The view is that April is a crucial month. With each additional week of conflict, the deterioration is not linear, it is exponential. The risk is not just in oil, but across the whole chain: oil products and even fertilizers. The downside scenario is so adverse that the market ends up clinging to any positive signal to sustain the rally,” he said.

*By Maria Fernanda Salinet — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

NEWSLETTER

March 2026

 

 

 

02/03/2026

CABO VERDE MINERAÇÃO FINDS NEW RARE EARTHS AREA IN MINAS GERAIS

Company seeks international partners to fund processing complex

 

Cabo Verde Mineração, a Brazilian company based in Belo Horizonte, has identified a new target area for rare earth extraction. The site, known as Alvo Botelhos, lies on the edge of the Poços de Caldas Alkaline Complex in southern Minas Gerais and has potential resources exceeding 500 million tonnes of ionic clays.

 

The company is in talks with international groups to finance the construction of an industrial complex to process the rare earth elements.

 

“The scale of the project, with more than 91,000 hectares across 57 mining rights, along with the results we have so far, point to the potential for a world-class project,” said Túlio Rivadávia Amaral, CEO of Cabo Verde Mineração.

 

Ionic clay is a type of clay that contains rare earth ions and is used in energy transition technologies, wind power generation, high-efficiency motors, electric vehicle batteries, advanced electronics, and other applications. In the Alvo Botelhos area, tests indicated the presence of high-value magnetic elements such as neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, and terbium, according to Rivadávia.

 

Exploration at Alvo Botelhos is being conducted alongside drilling at Alvo Caconde 1, located in the same Poços de Caldas complex, where the company initially pursued an iron ore project.

 

The targets lie within a block of approximately 91,000 hectares covering four municipalities in Minas Gerais—Muzambinho, Cabo Verde, Campestre, and Botelhos—as well as Caconde in São Paulo state. Rivadávia said the mining company holds 57 mineral rights for exploration in the region.

 

Among the technical results from priority targets are intervals of 16 meters with average grades of 2,245 parts per million of total rare earth oxides (TREO), including readings of 4,302 ppm TREO and 854 ppm magnetic rare earth oxides (MREO).

 

“Anomalies are distributed across all four quadrants of the surveyed areas, with results reaching as high as 14,000 ppm and significant recurrence in the 3,000-ppm range,” said Oscar Yokoi, a geologist and technical consultant and a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.

 

SGS Geosol conducted metallurgical leaching tests, which showed TREO recoveries of up to 81.7% and MREO recoveries above 60%, indicating technical and economic feasibility for mining. Samples were analyzed and certified by ALS Brasil and SGS Geosol laboratories.

 

Rivadávia told Valor that the project began as an iron mining venture in 2020, but during studies a hydrothermal alteration—a volcanic fissure—was identified, suggesting the presence of rare earths. The company then decided to focus on further exploration.

 

Research began in 2022. The first discovery was at the Caconde target, in the municipality of the same name, and the second was made now. “At Alvo Caconde, we identified a potential of 100 million tonnes of rare earths at 3,200 ppm. That alone could supply a plant for 20 years with output of 5 million tonnes per year. With Botelhos, the expectation is at least 500 million tonnes,” Rivadávia said.

 

An initial economic assessment at Alvo Botelhos indicated extraction potential of at least 500 million tonnes of rare earths. Drilling began last week.

 

Rivadávia said he is in talks with groups from the European Union, Canada, the United States and China to raise funding for the project, though the names of the groups remain confidential at this stage.

 

For the first phase, covering exploration and certification of the areas, Cabo Verde Mineração is investing about $10 million of its own funds.

 

The company is seeking financing to build the industrial complex, which is expected to require $370 million for a plant with capacity to process 5 million tonnes per year.

 

The initial plan is to install the plant in Cabo Verde, Minas Gerais, where the company already holds licenses to extract and process iron ore.

 

In parallel with the rare earth project, Cabo Verde Mineração resumed in December 2025 its iron ore mining project at the Catumbi Mine, located in Cabo Verde and Muzambinho, southern Minas Gerais. The project had been halted for two years while the company focused on rare earth exploration.

 

“The iron ore reserve is small, close to one million tonnes. We have a license to extract 600,000 tonnes per year. I estimate it will be a project lasting about two and a half years,” Rivadávia said. The company plans to produce lump ore and sinter feed with an average iron content of 66%, aimed at the domestic market.

 

The rare earth project, however, is expected to take six to seven years to complete the industrial complex and obtain all licenses and certifications needed for production, according to the executive.

 

Rare earth mining differs from other types of extraction. The company uses ammonium sulfate, which exchanges ions with the clay to separate the rare earth elements. The clay is then returned to the environment enriched with ammonia, a type of fertilizer.

 

Much of the land involved is currently used for large-scale coffee plantations. “Our intention is to partner with producers. We pay compensation for coffee trees removed during mining. Farmers also receive an exploration royalty equal to 0.5% of CFEM [Brazil’s financial compensation for mineral resource exploitation],” Rivadávia said.

 

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

 

___________________________________

03/02/2026

 

CLOSED-DOOR VOTE AT BRAZIL REGULATOR SPARKS SCRUTINY IN AMBIPAR CASE

Public spending watchdog questions CVM decision that spared company from tender offer benefiting Banco Master

 

The decisive meeting that upheld the controversial ruling by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil (CVM) exempting Ambipar from launching a mandatory takeover bid—a decision that ultimately benefited Banco Master—was held behind closed doors and included the participation of an external federal prosecutor with no formal link to the case. Both elements, considered unusual by insiders, had remained internal matters within the regulator. They have now come to light after the technical staff of the public spending watchdog, TCU, questioned the vote.

 

In recent weeks, Valor spoke with several CVM officials who participated in or had knowledge of details from the session, held just days before Christmas. The minutes of the meeting have yet to be published—another peculiarity in the case. Typically, the agency releases minutes roughly 30 days after its meetings.

 

In addition to confirming on the merits the decision to waive Ambipar’s obligation to conduct a takeover bid, the board unanimously upheld the casting vote of then-interim chairman Otto Lobo, which is now under scrutiny by the TCU, as previously reported by Valor. Lobo has been nominated by President Lula to chair the CVM and is awaiting Senate confirmation.

 

Contacted by Valor, Lobo confirmed details of the meeting but said the deliberations followed standard institutional procedures applied in similar cases.

 

The Ambipar matter was the final item on an agenda that included five other proceedings, in a meeting that began at 10 a.m. on December 23, a Tuesday. The board was set to analyze appeals involving a pharmaceutical company, irregularities in the capital markets, and administrative matters under the CVM’s authority.

 

When Lobo called for a vote on the Ambipar appeal, participants were surprised by an unusual request: he asked all staff members not directly linked to the case to leave the room.

 

Although the CVM’s Tuesday morning board deliberations are not open to the public, it is uncommon to ask agency staff to exit, as attendance by employees not directly involved in a specific case is generally permitted. Exceptions typically apply only when a matter is classified as confidential, which was not the case for the Ambipar discussion. After asking staff to leave, Lobo informed those present that he had called in an external participant.

 

The individual was federal prosecutor Ilene Patrícia de Noronha Najjarian, who has worked at the CVM for many years and currently serves as a sitting member of the National Financial System Appeals Council (CRSFN), which reviews sanctions imposed by the CVM, the Central Bank, and the Financial Activities Control Council (COAF). She is in her second term representing the CVM at the appeals body.

 

According to accounts from those present, Najjarian’s participation caused discomfort. The CVM’s Specialized Federal Attorney’s Office (PFE) had previously taken an institutional position against Lobo’s interpretation, arguing that he should not have exercised the casting vote that exempted Ambipar from the tender offer requirement. In the PFE’s view, Lobo could not break the tie because when the case first came before the board, he was not the CVM’s chairman. At the time, João Pedro Nascimento chaired the agency and had voted in favor of requiring the takeover bid.

 

When the case returned to the agenda after Lobo requested additional review, the vote was tied two-to-two. Director Marina Copola sided with Nascimento in favor of the tender offer, while Director João Accioly voted with Lobo. Lobo then cast the tie-breaking vote in favor of Ambipar and its shareholders, including Banco Master, Nelson Tanure, and controlling shareholder Tércio Borlenghi Junior.

 

During the December meeting, the PFE reiterated its position, this time through acting chief federal prosecutor Marcelo Mello Alves Pereira, who had taken over from Luciana Alves. She had stepped down from the role in September, months after formally opposing Lobo’s interpretation.

 

According to people familiar with the matter, Alves had already indicated she intended to head the CVM’s attorney’s office for only two years. She had been in charge of the Specialized Federal Attorney’s Office (PFE) since 2023. However, Valor has learned that Lobo’s appointment as interim chairman of the CVM also weighed on her decision, given that the PFE provides direct legal counsel to the chairman, who is responsible for appointing the head of the office.

 

In this context, Marcelo Mello Alves Pereira was serving as head of the CVM’s legal department. Although he maintained the PFE’s formal position against Lobo’s procedural interpretation, the interim chairman gave the floor to Najjarian, who spoke in support of Lobo’s view and against the stance of the PFE itself.

 

Participants described the moment as awkward, noting that Najjarian’s remarks contradicted the position of her direct superior. Among federal prosecutors, the episode was viewed as a form of insubordination. Sources also noted that in recent years, there have been no reports of Najjarian participating in board-level decision meetings, as she does not hold a leadership role within the PFE.

 

“If everyone not linked to the case had to leave the room, why was a prosecutor who did not head the legal department allowed in to contradict her superiors?” a CVM source told Valor.

 

During Lobo’s interim leadership, sources said Najjarian had been consulted on other occasions regarding legal doubts in certain decisions. Should the Senate confirm Lobo as chairman, she is considered the leading candidate to head the PFE-CVM.

 

Another element that drew attention during the December judgment was the stance of CVM Superintendent-General Alexandre Pinheiro, who heads the agency’s technical staff. Although the technical department had challenged Lobo’s interpretation, exempting Ambipar from the tender offer, Pinheiro submitted a written statement supporting Lobo’s view, which was read during the meeting. He was not present at the session.

 

Pinheiro’s position was poorly received by other superintendents, who felt unsupported in a high-profile and controversial case. In the initial vote, when Lobo cast the deciding vote, Pinheiro had not made any statement, despite being present at that session.

 

At the conclusion of the December meeting, the board unanimously rejected the appeal filed by the technical staff. While Copola maintained that the tender offer was required, she supported Lobo’s interpretation regarding the casting vote.

 

The connection between Banco Master and Ambipar emerged after the capital markets regulator investigated an alleged coordinated operation involving the bank and businessmen Nelson Tanure and Tércio Borlenghi Jr., Ambipar’s main shareholder, to boost the company’s share price by roughly 800% between June and August 2024. Had Ambipar been required to conduct a tender offer, those shareholders would have faced multi-billion-real payments.

 

The TCU’s technical staff identified “indications of wrongdoing” in Lobo’s casting vote. In a formal opinion, they concluded that because the original judgment began under João Pedro Nascimento’s presidency, the tie-breaking vote should have been attributed to him, even though he was not present at the December session.

 

Lobo was nominated to chair the CVM by President Lula in January, in a move that reportedly went against the preference of the Finance Ministry, to which the CVM is linked. His nomination has been attributed to members of the judiciary, business figures close to Lula, and leaders from the Centrão, a cluster of center-to-right parties in Congress.

 

In a statement to Valor, Lobo said the “conduct of the proceedings observed the applicable institutional procedures.” The removal of individuals from the room, he said, aimed to “minimize the risk of information leakage before official publication.”

 

Regarding Najjarian’s participation, Lobo said she “had a formal understanding of the case, as did the superintendent-general.” He described the move as consistent with session dynamics “whenever legal advisory support or the hearing of professionals with broad technical insight is deemed appropriate.”

 

Former PFE chief Luciana Alves said, through the Federal Attorney General’s Office (AGU), that her departure was for personal reasons unrelated to the Ambipar case.

 

Najjarian said inquiries should be directed to the CVM and the AGU. Both institutions were contacted.

 

In a statement, the CVM said the minutes had not yet been published “due to workflow” and would be made available “in due course.” Regarding Najjarian’s presence, the regulator did not provide a copy of her statement or explain the reason for her participation, saying the relevant institutional information would be reflected in the minutes.

 

On the superintendent-general’s absence, the CVM said he was “on recess” and represented by his deputy, Maria Lúcia Macieira de Mello. The agency did not provide the written statement read during the session and recommended “consultation of the meeting minutes at the appropriate time.”

 

Valor also asked how many board meetings Najjarian attended over the past five years, but received no response. The CVM likewise did not answer whether she would declare herself recused from judging Ambipar-related cases at the CRSFN should appeals arise in the future.

 

All other parties mentioned were contacted. Banco Master and Ambipar declined to comment by press time. Nelson Tanure said his acquisition of Ambipar shares occurred after the events described by the CVM and that there were no irregularities.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

 

__________________________________

03/11/2026

 

LNG PRICES SURGE AMID MIDDLE EAST WAR; IMPACT IN BRAZIL IS LIMITED

Gulf supply disruptions tighten market, while Brazil’s reliance on alternative suppliers may soften local effects

 

The war in the Middle East has pushed liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices up by more than 70%, driven by two main factors: the halt in supply from Qatar, one of the world’s largest exporters, and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf, through which about 20% of global oil flows. In Brazil, however, the impact of the LNG price surge on domestic prices is expected to be limited, according to experts interviewed by Valor.

 

Before the conflict began, on February 27, LNG was priced at €32.38 per megawatt-hour (MWh). By Monday (9), it had risen to €55.86 per MWh, a 73% increase in the European Title Transfer Facility (TTF) market, one of the main global benchmarks for the commodity.

 

After a bombing at the Ras Laffan facility in Qatar on March 2, QatarEnergy suspended LNG production. One of the main challenges resulting from the shutdown is the lack of viable alternative routes for transporting large volumes, which has pushed prices higher. The International Energy Agency (IEA) warns that a prolonged supply interruption could worsen shortages in the market.

 

Vitor Santos, a professor of economics at the Lisbon School of Economics & Management (ISEG), said the closure of the Strait of Hormuz limits export capacity for several producing countries. Importers, meanwhile, face supply difficulties. “The closure of the Strait of Hormuz harms producers in the Persian Gulf and the main Asian consumers of oil and natural gas, which have a high dependence on fossil fuel imports,” Santos said.

 

An analysis by the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES) in June 2025 had already assessed that a global LNG price shock triggered by the closure of Hormuz could resemble the surge seen in 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine, when spot prices approached $30 per million BTU. “Another price shock similar to that of 2022 could bring direct consequences to government budgets in Europe and Asia,” the study said.

 

In Brazil, LNG began to be used in the 2000s as the country struggled to expand its natural gas supply for thermal power generation. Petrobras installed three regasification terminals at the time—one in Rio de Janeiro, one in Ceará, and another in Bahia. Today, Brazil has six LNG terminals in operation. According to experts, price and supply effects in the local market should remain limited.

 

Rodrigo Borges, managing director of Aurora Energy Research in Brazil, said that when LNG prices surge globally, the marginal cost of thermal plants increases, potentially pushing up electricity prices in Brazil, particularly when the power system needs to activate these plants.

 

Diogo Lisbona, a researcher at FGV Ceri, explained that energy and natural gas prices could reflect the effects of the war in the short term. This is because large consumers and some thermal plants operate under contracts with quarterly adjustments linked to the weighted average of Brent crude prices.

 

Rivaldo Moreira Neto, managing partner at A&M Infra, said oil markets are broader and allow some mitigation of Hormuz-related disruptions through increased production elsewhere in the world. LNG, however, does not have the same flexibility. Moreira noted that Europe and Asia are major consumers of Qatari LNG and emphasized that the Hormuz blockade is more significant for LNG than for oil.

 

“Brazil, as an importer, is not necessarily expected to face supply interruptions, since we import from the United States and the United Kingdom. The issue is price, which should rise significantly,” Moreira said.

 

Adriano Pires, a partner at the Brazilian Infrastructure Center (CBIE), believes any effects will likely be limited and related to potential rerouting of ships to meet specific demand. Pires noted that in Brazil, natural gas is generally traded through long-term contracts. Concern may focus on the capacity reserve auction scheduled for March 18.

 

According to PSR Consultoria, the impact of the crisis on Brazil’s market will depend on how many thermal plants have fuel costs tied to international prices and how these indicators evolve. “If the crisis persists, pressure on these indices will be strong, leading to higher variable costs for thermal plants and impacts on electricity prices,” PSR said.

 

One point of attention is the availability of gas for thermal plants during the conflict and how much Middle Eastern supply could be replaced by U.S. exports. PSR notes that the United States is expected to add around 60 million tonnes per year of new LNG export capacity between 2026 and 2027. “Although this volume would not replace Qatar, it is a robust amount that could help cushion demand in a prolonged crisis.”

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

______________________________________

03/16/2026

 

MASTER USED CARTEL-LINKED SUPPLIER TO MOVE DEPOSITOR MONEY

Provider of school kits, Army goods and water cisterns took an unusual loan and transferred R$385 million to a fund managed by asset manager Reag

 

 

Banco Master used a company linked to a public procurement cartel to divert R$385 million raised from depositors to funds managed by asset manager Reag, Valor has found based on public documents and on a Central Bank report sent to prosecutors about allegedly fraudulent credit operations.

 

EBN Comércio, Importação e Exportação Ltda. and its controlling shareholder, Julio Manfredini, have been active in public tenders to supply a wide range of products, including school uniform kits, books, Army footwear and even water cisterns for drought relief in Brazil’s semiarid Northeast, either directly or through consortia with other companies.

 

In at least one case, the tender stemmed from mandatory congressional caucus earmarks and included a direct request from then-Senator Roberto Rocha of Maranhão state, from the Republicans Party, that a specific price-registration record be used to purchase 500 cisterns for the state.

 

A report of suspected crimes sent by the Central Bank to prosecutors in November says EBN obtained a loan from Banco Master with no apparent economic justification. The company then transferred R$385 million to D Mais fund, managed by Reag.

 

From there, the funds were reallocated through a chain of funds in a transaction that allegedly served to divert the money to other purposes. The transaction is part of a set of operations involving 36 companies, whose names were disclosed by Valor, that allegedly led to a total diversion of R$11.5 billion from Banco Master.

 

Manfredini is EBN’s managing partner, according to records at the São Paulo State Board of Trade.

 

That company, Manfredini himself, have ties to Capricórnio S/A, which in 2021 was convicted by Brazil’s antitrust watchdog, Cade, for operating a cartel in public tenders for school uniforms and school supply kits for public school students in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina and Goiás between 2007 and 2012.

 

That case also gave rise to a criminal proceeding in São Paulo over alleged violations of Brazil’s bidding law, which was dismissed in 2025 after the court found that prosecutors had failed to individualize the conduct of each defendant. There is also a civil case for administrative misconduct still pending in São Paulo.

 

Another proceeding, at Brazil’s Federal Court of Accounts, or TCU, involving Army procurement, shows that Capricórnio was EBN’s sole shareholder at incorporation and that EBN is its successor, keeping the same address and 70% of its workforce. Manfredini was Capricórnio’s chief executive.

 

According to Valor’s review, EBN took part in tenders and signed contracts with the Army between 2016 and 2024 to supply equipment such as tents, uniforms and footwear. There are no suspicions regarding those contracts, but the TCU’s technical staff did investigate flaws in oversight of footwear delivered by EBN, without imposing any sanctions.

 

Cistern contracts

 

In addition to direct tenders, EBN also joined five consortia, and some partners in those ventures are under investigation, including for alleged irregularities in the supply of textbooks in Rio de Janeiro.

 

EBN formed the Consortium EC, for which there are no documented suspicions of wrongdoing, alongside CSL Educacional, a company cited in the Calvário operation. One of its partners, Márcio Nogueira Vignoli, was arrested during the investigation and is awaiting trial out of custody.

 

One of EBN’s contracts involved the supply of cisterns in Maranhão and stands out because it originated in mandatory congressional caucus earmarks and because of the direction given to the type of bidding process that led to the R$2.4 million purchase in 2017.

 

Senator Rocha, then a member of the Brazilian Social Democracy Party, sent a letter to the head of Codevasf, the São Francisco Valley Development Company, stating that R$5 million in congressional earmarks had been allocated to buy cisterns and requesting that the company express interest in price-registration record No. 24/2017 from the Federal Institute of Education of Ceará, or IFCE, Maracanaú campus.

 

In practice, that meant the purchase, initially estimated at 2,400 cisterns but with only 500 ultimately acquired, piggybacked on a much smaller IFCE tender aimed at buying 50 storage tanks for the institute. At first glance, there is no irregularity in that mechanism, which saves procedural costs. What stands out is that the request came from a politician, rather than from Codevasf’s technical staff.

 

The procedure also required discussions among Codevasf technicians because it fell outside the usual standards of the Água para Todos (Water for All) program, under which the policy for distributing cisterns follows defined priorities. In the end, the cisterns were donated to nonprofit associations, such as rural unions, which then distributed the units to beneficiary families.

 

EBN said the loan from Banco Master was entirely lawful and was intended to provide capital for the acquisition of a large textile company. The resources were partly invested in D Mais fund, managed by Reag, then regarded as a reputable institution in the market, so the money would not sit idle.

 

“The negotiations did not go ahead because of unresolved differences and the complexity of the ownership structure,” the company said in a statement. EBN repaid the loan to Banco Master.

 

The company said Capricórnio has an independent structure from EBN and that a lawsuit was filed seeking to nullify Cade’s decision. “The criminal and misconduct cases have all, so far, been decided in Capricórnio’s favor.”

 

On the consortia, it said EBN conducted due diligence through compliance mechanisms. “At the time the consortium was formed, EBN had no relationship with legal entities whose executives were under investigation or facing criminal proceedings.” In the case of the cisterns, the company said the deal was approved by all oversight bodies and denied any relationship that was not in strict compliance with the rules.

 

Senator Roberto Rocha said joining IFCE’s price-registration record was an administrative decision to make it possible to execute the earmarks within the budget timetable, since the funds are generally released at the end of the year. He said the project followed Codevasf’s technical rules and the legal requirements for mandatory earmarks, that his office maintained institutional contact only with IFCE, and that there was no relationship with the company that won the tender.

 

Codevasf said it did not join a price-registration record for a tender that had already been completed, but rather one that had yet to be held, with open competition and acquisition of goods at the lowest price. “Communications between agencies to express purchase intentions are routine,” it said.

 

“For funding provided through a congressional earmark, identifying the beneficiaries is the responsibility of the lawmaker who submitted the earmark,” the company said in a statement. Even so, it said, parameters similar to those of the Water for All program were adopted, which helped ensure that the funds were directed to vulnerable families.

 

IFCE said the Maracanaú campus acted only as the manager of the price-registration record, regularly conducting the auction and managing the record. According to the institute, adhesion by other public bodies is allowed by both the tender notice and legislation, and it is up to the joining body, in this case Codevasf, to assess technical suitability, quantities and budget availability.

 

IFCE also said there were no spending commitments by Codevasf while the record was in effect and that the process followed normal procedures, with a favorable legal opinion.

 

The Army said its contracts with EBN are available on Brazil’s Transparency Portal and that, so far, no signs of irregularities or failures in oversight have been identified. It also said there are no ongoing proceedings or audits at the Federal Court of Accounts involving contracts with the company.

 

Lawyers for Banco Master controlling shareholder, Daniel Vorcaro, said they would not comment on the matter. Reag had not responded to requests for comment by the time this edition went to press, nor had the companies that are part of the consortia with EBN.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

____________________________________

 

03/17/2026

 

FOREIGN INVESTORS RAISE SHARE OF BRAZIL M&A TO 41%

Trend reflects global portfolio reallocation and shifting geopolitical dynamics

 

The share of foreign investors in competitive bids for Brazilian companies has risen again as a direct result of the global portfolio reallocation trend and a new geopolitical dynamic, partly driven by uncertainty under Donald Trump’s administration, which has favored emerging markets.

 

As a result, overseas investors accounted for a larger share of total deals completed in Brazil. Their participation in mergers and acquisitions rose from 31% of the total in 2024 to 41% last year.

 

That means that, of the R$267.7 billion in M&A deals recorded in 2025, R$110 billion came from foreign acquisitions. Based on the number of deals, the share rose from 26% to 34% in 2025. Of 342 transactions in total, 116 involved foreign buyers.

 

The trend has been even more evident at the start of this year, which has already seen major cross-border deals. In the first two months of the year, the foreign share reached 76%, still based on the number of transactions, according to data from Dealogic, a consultancy that compiles market data worldwide.

 

This year, one of the main foreign-related transactions is the sale of aluminum producer CBA, previously owned by Votorantim, to China’s Chinalco and Anglo-Australian miner Rio Tinto, in a R$4.7 billion deal. Another relevant transaction was the sale of IHS Towers’ tower assets in Brazil to Macquarie Asset Management.

 

In March, the entry of U.S. fund Warburg Pincus into egg producer Global Eggs, with a $1 billion investment, reinforced the trend. In 2025, highlights included Iberdrola’s increased stake in Neoenergia and the sale of Motiva’s airports to Mexican group Asur.

 

Shift toward emerging markets

 

With global volatility, much of it tied to measures taken by U.S. President Donald Trump, and amid a weakening dollar, global capital has been moving toward emerging markets, benefiting Brazil.

 

That has been more evident in the stock market, where foreign inflows reached about R$40 billion just at the start of this year, already surpassing the total for 2025, when inflows amounted to R$25 billion. The same trend, however, is now beginning to show up in the M&A industry.

 

“The global portfolio diversification trend, which we have seen more clearly in the capital markets, is now also becoming visible in M&A,” said Flavio Egon de Picciotto, co-head of M&A at Itaú BBA. He noted that investor interest is most visible in sectors such as infrastructure, energy, and natural resources. “Energy remains a driver, always the most representative,” he said.

 

Foreign participation in M&A talks has not been driven only by U.S. investors, highlighting the search for diversification across geographies. “At the turn of 2025 to 2026, discussions about capital reallocation increased, with flows into emerging markets. The environment of persistent uncertainty increased the weight of diversification. We are also seeing growing interest from European and Asian investors in assets in Brazil,” said Anderson Brito, head of investment banking at UBS BB.

 

In the breakdown of 2025 cross-border deals, North America accounted for 14.3%, while Europe represented 36.7% and Asia 34%.

 

Broader interest

 

Fabio Medeiros, head of Morgan Stanley’s investment banking business in Brazil, said he expects a busier year for M&A activity in the country. “There is a flow heading toward emerging markets, and that is starting to show up in M&A, with companies that might have considered investing in the United States now looking at Brazil,” he said. One of the highlights, Medeiros added, is the appearance of new foreign buyers.

 

“Brazil is well positioned to attract foreign investment,” he said. In addition to the traditional infrastructure and natural resources sectors, which have historically attracted this type of capital, he highlighted interest in the financial and technology sectors.

 

Diogo Aragão, head of M&A at Bank of America in Brazil, said the new global dynamic has increased foreign interest in certain segments, such as infrastructure and, more recently, natural resources, with greater concentration in mining, including rare earths. “We are seeing a diversification trend in funding sources, and I think it is here to stay,” said the BofA executive.

 

Beyond those sectors, he said Brazil’s technology segment also has the potential to attract foreign investors, given that major global players remain underpenetrated in the country. Last year, the main transaction in that segment was the entry of European giant Visma into Brazil through the acquisition of Conta Azul.

 

Pedro Muzzi of Goldman Sachs stressed that foreign interest in Brazilian assets has been rising, with new names joining the processes. “There is a lot of appetite and interest in Brazil. It is hotter than ever,” he said.

 

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

 

_____________________________________

03/17/2026

 

U.S. SEEKS POLITICAL SIGNAL FROM BRAZIL ON CRITICAL MINERALS DEAL

Washington proposes tailored framework with price floor and financing as Brasília remains divided over openness

 

 

The Trump administration is awaiting a “clear political signal” from Brazil to move forward with a bilateral agreement on critical minerals, according to a spokesperson for the U.S. Embassy. The proposal is to establish a tailored cooperation framework between the two countries, including priorities such as setting a minimum price for these materials.

 

Critical minerals—used in advanced technologies in sectors such as defense and communications—have become a focal point of geopolitical competition.

 

The U.S. aims to build a partnership with Brazil capable of strengthening both countries’ industrial and technological bases. According to the spokesperson, Washington is interested in cooperating to expand processing capacity for these minerals.

 

More than 50 mining projects in Brazil have already been identified “that could contribute to international efforts to diversify and strengthen global supply chains for critical minerals,” the spokesperson said.

 

To enhance its position in the sector, the United States has outlined priorities, including discussions on a price floor, incentives for responsible investment in mining and processing that benefit both countries’ industrial bases, and streamlined licensing procedures. U.S. officials emphasize that the dialogue is intended to deliver mutual benefits.

 

Brazil holds the world’s second-largest reserves

 

Brazil’s rare earth reserves—estimated at 21 million tonnes—are emerging as a key element in global geopolitics. The country holds the world’s second-largest reserves but still lags in extracting these elements.

 

Given Brazil’s potential, the United States says the country could play a central role in developing global supply chains for critical minerals. “The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and the Export-Import Bank of the United States are offering more than $600 million in financing for ongoing critical minerals projects in Brazil, and we see potential for billions of dollars in additional investment,” the embassy spokesperson said, referring to U.S. government-backed institutions.

 

Seeking to deepen cooperation, the U.S. government will host an event this week to discuss opportunities for collaboration with Brazil in the sector. The Critical Minerals Forum will take place on March 18 in São Paulo and is expected to bring together more than 100 companies and representatives from state governments.

 

Brazil currently occupies a paradoxical position in the geopolitics of energy-transition minerals: it holds vast reserves but remains a minor producer, resulting in the underutilization of significant economic potential for income, industrialization, and technological development. This gap—typical of countries that fail to convert comparative advantage into competitive advantage—represents the main measurable economic opportunity for the coming decades.

 

As Valor reported, members of the Brazilian government say the critical minerals agenda remains stalled due to a lack of internal consensus on how open the country should be to foreign participation.

 

One faction within the Lula administration argues that imposing constraints on the sector at this stage would be counterproductive, given Brazil’s vast potential. These officials oppose agreements that could introduce restrictions on domestic production. This was also one of the main reasons Brazil declined to join a U.S.-led alliance on critical minerals and rare earths announced in early February.

 

Given the strategic importance of the issue, critical minerals are expected to feature on the agenda of a bilateral meeting between Lula and Trump, tentatively scheduled for March or April, though no date has been set.

 

Brazilian government sources argue that the country should engage with multiple partners rather than align exclusively with any single country or bloc. At the same time, they resist the idea that Brazil should remain merely a supplier of raw materials.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

 

___________________________________

03/23/2026

 

SPECIAL PENSIONS EXPAND IN BRAZIL, BUCKING GLOBAL TREND

Benefit covering rural workers and teachers makes up 40% of scheduled retirements, in a pattern with no parallel in the OECD

 

Special pensions granted to rural workers, teachers, and people exposed to harmful agents accounted for nearly 40% of so-called scheduled retirements—those based on age and years of contributions—granted by Brazil’s General Social Security Regime (RGPS) in 2024.

 

That level is far above what is seen in the 38 member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). In Greece, the country with the highest share, special pensions account for 11% of the total. Of the 38 countries analyzed, 27 grant special pensions, while 11 do not offer early retirement.

 

The figures come from the study Aposentadorias Especiais: Tendências Internacionais e o Caso Brasileiro (Special Pensions: International Trends and the Brazilian Case), by Rogério Nagamine Constanzi, a researcher at the Institute for Applied Economic Research (Ipea). The survey shows that internationally, the trend has been to restrict or eliminate special pensions, amid doubts about their effectiveness.

 

In Brazil, these rules have contributed not only to earlier retirements but also to a rise in benefits granted through the courts.

 

“The standard argument for allowing early retirement based solely on the inability to continue a career in a specific job has lost strength over time. Many OECD countries have eliminated or restricted access to special or early retirement for dangerous or strenuous jobs.

 

“Labor-market policies should seek to prepare workers for career changes at some point, so they can remain employed until the minimum retirement age. In the Brazilian case, there is a need for more efficient active labor-market policies,” the study says.

 

Economists interviewed by Valor support adjustments to special regimes in a new pension reform to slow the pace of spending on retirement and survivor benefits.

 

In Brazil, special pensions under the RGPS include those for rural workers, teachers, workers exposed to harmful agents, and insured persons with disabilities. In the public-sector pension system, known as the RPPS, they include those granted to teachers, workers exposed to harmful agents, insured persons with disabilities, military personnel, and police officers.

 

Rural pensions

 

Nagamine’s study shows that, if rural pensions alone are considered, special pensions accounted for 35.6% of total scheduled RGPS retirements in December 2024. If pensions granted for exposure to harmful agents and those for teachers are also included, the share rises to 38.7%. That percentage would be even higher if pensions for people with disabilities were included.

 

“Out of a total of 20.2 million scheduled pensions under the RGPS, about 7.2 million were rural pensions, almost all based on age. In fact, considering only age-based pensions, rural pensions accounted for 54.4% of the total in December 2024. If all pensions are considered, including disability pensions, the rural share falls to one-third (32.4% of the total),” the study says.

 

The survey also shows that in the state-level RPPS, the estimate for 2022 was that elementary-education teachers accounted for about four out of every 10 retirees, or 42%. “All of these figures reinforce the diagnosis that special or early pensions in Brazil have a high level of coverage compared with the international landscape,” Nagamine writes in the study.

 

The weight of special pensions for basic-education teachers in state and municipal public-sector pension systems stands out because the benefit is uncommon in OECD countries, where it was found in only six: Belgium, Colombia, Costa Rica, Estonia, Italy, and Poland.

 

This high degree of differentiated treatment in retirement has fueled debate, especially internationally, over whether the measure is really effective or whether it would be more appropriate to establish better working conditions through health and safety regulations, limiting exposure to risk factors and encouraging social partners to adopt measures in that direction.

 

Of the OECD’s 38 member countries, for example, in 15—or 39.5% of the total—there is no special pension, or it is limited to police officers, firefighters, or military personnel. “In Brazil, there is a history of broad coverage for special pensions without there necessarily being a basis in solid evidence,” the study says.

 

Pressure for reform

 

The survey also says it is necessary to take into account that the risks involved in certain occupations or sectors are not fixed over time—new risks or new occupations may emerge—and that the labor force shifts, for example, from agriculture and industry to the services sector. “There is a possibility that, due to technological progress, hardship will continue to decline, because strenuous or arduous work tends to be progressively replaced by technology,” the study says.

 

Nagamine also notes that the debate over whether the characteristics of a certain type of work justify early or special retirement compared with the general rule is complex and sometimes involves political power or corporate interests that can lead to unfair treatment. In OECD countries, for example, there has been a movement to restrict this type of benefit.

 

“In theory, early retirement would be a way to compensate workers in occupations or activities that, in the medium and long term, tend to reduce life expectancy. For that reason, the criteria should not be limited to wear and tear at work, but should encompass the potential negative effects of working conditions on health,” the study says, adding that the complexity of the issue is worsened by the growing focus on psychological problems caused by stress at work.

 

The study also says that in Brazil the average duration of these benefits has increased as a result of longer life expectancy among recipients of special pensions. The average duration of this type of benefit rose from about 14.1 years in 2000 to 29.2 years in 2021.

 

For Luís Eduardo Afonso, a professor at the School of Economics and Administration at the University of São Paulo, “exceptions are, as a rule, bad.” “They are a form of differentiated treatment for a group that managed to make its pressure power count,” the expert said. In the pension reform enacted in November 2019, military personnel were left out, and some categories kept more favorable retirement conditions than the general rule.

 

Otávio Sidone, a federal civil servant, Social Security specialist, and doctoral student at the University of Brasília, said special regimes need to be continually assessed so that any subsidies to the public debate can be made clear.

 

Arnaldo Lima, the economist in charge of institutional relations at Polo Capital, added that special pension regimes, besides carrying a high cost for public finances, encourage early retirement. “They should only be preserved when there is objective proof of risk or hardship, with extra financial compensation in the labor market, and not in Social Security.”

 

He also said the growing number of benefit claims going through the courts, especially in rural areas, is a concern. “In rural areas alone, 30% of benefits depend on court rulings. The solution involves binding administrative precedents, standardized criteria, and greater digitization. Litigation often stems from a lack of legal clarity,” he said.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

_________________________________

03/23/2026

 

HOTEL CHAINS EXPAND INTO BRAZIL’S AGRIBUSINESS CITIES

Growth in farming regions is driving hotel development across Brazil, with international operators targeting secondary markets, new demand hubs

 

The strength of Brazil’s agribusiness sector, which has fueled broad economic growth in countryside cities, has supported the hotel industry’s expansion in recent years. Cities in the Central-West, South, and Southeast that once had limited hospitality infrastructure have become increasingly construction hubs for new developments.

 

Beyond local entrepreneurs’ role in project financing, the sector has benefited from development banks, which have been key in a high-interest-rate environment.

 

The surge in hotel demand in agribusiness regions has surprised French hotel group Accor.

 

“We operate with a highly structured approach, mapping around 100 key cities along Brazil’s so-called agribusiness corridor. We are already present in more than 30 cities like those and continue to expand,” Thomas Dubaere, CEO of Accor Americas for the premium, midscale, and economy division, told Valor.

 

One standout region is Matopiba, which spans the Brazilian cerrado biome across the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí, and Bahia. “This is a region experiencing strong agricultural expansion and attracting investment,” Dubaere said.

 

In Brazil, Accor opened ten new hotels last year, including two in agribusiness regions: ibis Styles Bonito (Mato Grosso do Sul) and ibis Primavera do Leste (Mato Grosso). It also signed agreements for five additional hotels in locations such as Chapadão do Sul and Bonito.

 

The group currently operates 30 hotels in agribusiness cities, totaling 4,135 rooms across states including Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí, Bahia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Goiás. A decade ago, it had 18 hotels and 2,388 rooms in these markets.

 

Accor draws on experience from mature markets such as Europe, where it has long operated in smaller cities, many linked to agriculture and industry.

 

“One key lesson is the importance of combining reach with brand consistency. Outside major urban centers, travelers value predictability even more—knowing exactly what to expect regardless of the location,” Dubaere said, noting that demand in these regions is primarily corporate.

 

The growth of agribusiness hubs has also led Marriott to introduce its City Express brand in Brazil, aimed at secondary and tertiary cities.

 

“It is one of our most important brands and the one we plan to scale most aggressively in terms of volume,” said Paulo Mancio, Marriott’s vice president of development in Brazil.

 

The company is currently evaluating projects in cities such as Bebedouro in São Paulo state and Sinop in Mato Grosso.

 

“City Express was designed with the Brazilian market in mind,” said Renato Carvalho, senior development manager at Marriott International in Brazil.

 

In the country, the brand will offer rooms ranging from 15 square meters to 20 square meters in properties with up to 140 rooms.

 

Marriott has signed seven new City Express contracts in Brazil—three with Fábrica de Hotéis and four with Justa & Utg Empreendimentos—adding about 945 rooms to its pipeline.

 

The three contracts with Fábrica de Hotéis are in the Northeast and add to the seven announced in March 2025 as part of a long-term agreement to develop 30 properties in the region over 15 years.

 

The deal with Justa & Utg will expand the brand’s footprint in the Southeast, including projects in Holambra (120 rooms), Araras (120 rooms), and Piracicaba (140 rooms)—all in São Paulo—, as well as Passos (140 rooms), in Minas Gerais.

 

In agribusiness regions, City Express’s strategy has focused on building new properties. Executives noted that conversions are possible but less likely due to the limited existing hotel supply.

 

Carvalho added that agribusiness has helped drive broader economic diversification in some cities. “Ribeirão Preto was once heavily tied to agribusiness and today has a significant services sector,” he said.

 

Growth in agribusiness regions is also evident at Atlantica Hospitality International, which has a strong presence in the Central-West, South, and Southeast. The company now operates 48 properties in these regions, totaling 6,631 rooms. In 2016, it had 27 hotels and 3,680 rooms—an increase of about 80% in room supply over a decade.

 

“These figures are central to Atlantica’s reach strategy, representing 25% of our total portfolio and 27% of our room supply,” said CEO Eduardo Giestas.

 

Part of the company’s strategy in these markets is to diversify hotel categories. Of its pipeline, 29% is in the luxury and upscale segment, 52% in the midscale segment, and 19% in the economy segment.

 

“In terms of financial performance, we recorded 17% growth in ADR [average daily rate] and 18% in RevPAR [revenue per available room] year over year in agribusiness regions,” Giestas said.

 

In less than a decade, Atlantica tripled its presence in the Central-West, a key grain-producing region, especially soybeans, corn, and cotton. In 2016, it operated four hotels in Mato Grosso and Goiás, totaling 613 rooms. Today, it has 15 hotels and 2,144 rooms.

 

“Including the Federal District, a key connectivity hub, the portfolio expands to 20 properties and 2,834 rooms—an increase of 275% in hotel count and 250% in room supply,” Giestas said.

 

The group currently has a pipeline of 16 signed hotels in agribusiness regions, scheduled to open between 2027 and 2031, totaling 2,602 rooms and about R$1 billion in investment. These projects account for 29% of our total hotel pipeline and 31% of our room pipeline.

 

“Currently, 31% of hotels under negotiation are located in these regions, reinforcing our confidence in the sector’s continued growth,” said the CEO.

 

At Atrio Hotel Management, the country’s third-largest hotel operator, agribusiness regions currently account for about 5% of revenue. The goal is to raise that share to 20% by 2030, CEO Beto Caputo said.

 

Atrio currently operates 82 hotels and has 15 signed for the next two years, including three in agribusiness regions.

 

Caputo noted that financial backing from traditional agribusiness families has helped move projects forward. Due to the limited existing hotel supply, conversions are rare, making new construction necessary.

 

“What we are seeing is that, with capital accumulation in these regions, there is a growing appetite among investors from different families for hotel projects,” he said. These resources, he added, are complemented by support from regional development banks, which help make projects viable at competitive rates despite high interest levels.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

__________________________________

 

03/23/2026

 

WORKWEEK REFORM CAN HAVE MIXED RESULTS FOR COMPANIES

Debaters believe the effects would be more negative for labor-intensive sectors and for smaller businesses

 

 

 

The prospect of ending the six-day workweek as discussed in Congress could have different impacts on Brazilian companies. The effects could be more negative for labor-intensive sectors, such as commerce and services in general, but also for smaller businesses, which have less capacity to adjust to a reduction in the maximum working hours, said experts who participated in another debate in the Caminhos do Brasil seminar series, in Rio de Janeiro, on Thursday (19). There is also uncertainty about the ability of companies to absorb cost increases, and how much this will affect employment, inflation, and economic activity.

 

According to the president of the Employment and Labor Relations Council of the Federation of Commerce of São Paulo (FecomercioSP), José Pastore, commerce would be one of the sectors most affected by the reduction in working hours for two reasons. On the one hand, it is labor-intensive. On the other hand, many establishments operate seven days a week, or even 24 hours a day, such as pharmacies and supermarkets. “The increase in working hours hits the retail sector hard. That’s why we can’t just look at the average. The Brazilian reality is very diverse, and the impacts are very different,” said Pastore.

 

For him, the new, shorter working hours schedule would require adaptation on the part of companies, which would have four possible adjustments to make. The first would be to pass on the increased payroll cost to the prices of goods and services sold, which may be inevitable, given that many companies operate with narrow profit margins.

 

The second mechanism would be to lay off employees with higher salaries and fill the vacancies with lower-paid workers, as a way to mitigate the increase in labor costs—which would increase turnover, a problem that typically causes training problems.

 

The third type of adjustment would be to invest in automation, replacing some employees with machinery. The result for the economy as a whole would be a reduction in job openings. Finally, given the increase in personnel costs, a fourth option would be to review the investment plan, which could lead to a contraction of businesses, slowing down economic activity and, in the worst case, leading to a recession. “There are four possible mechanisms. And the company might implement all four together. All of them are bad for the worker, especially the most vulnerable,” said Pastore.

 

Paulo Solmucci, president of the Brazilian Association of Bars and Restaurants (Abrasel), cited an estimated 20% increase in labor costs for companies in the sector, due to the introduction of two days off per week and the reduction in the weekly work schedule to 40 hours. This cost increase could not be offset by greater use of technology. The higher costs would then be passed on to the final prices for customers.

 

“The consumer wants the restaurant open for six days, just as they want the health center, the urban cleaning service. This means increasing the payroll by 20% to maintain service to the consumer, which results in 7% to 8% increases in price,” said Solmucci. “The consumer should ask: Does it fit their budget? Are you aware that you will pay more to have the same thing?”

 

A study by the National Confederation of Trade in Goods, Services and Tourism (CNC), released in February, estimates that reducing the work week to 40 hours could generate an extra cost of more than R$350 billion per year for commerce and service companies. According to the calculations, passing on part of this impact to consumers would lead to an average price increase of 13%. According to another study, published by the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), reducing the work week to 40 hours would increase labor costs by an average of 7.84% for companies. For IPEA researchers, an increase of this size is absorbable, as it is similar to that recorded in years of strong minimum wage adjustments, such as 2001, 2006, 2012, and 2024.

 

In the view of Congressman Reginaldo Lopes (Workers’ Party), author of one of the proposed amendments to the Constitution on the subject that are being discussed in the Chamber of Deputies, the impacts may be different depending on the sector, but if there is a four-year transition to the proposed reduction in weekly working schedule, the impact can be absorbed: “[It] is possible for medium and large companies. I recognize that, for a very small company, with two or three employees, the new 5×2 schedule may have a greater impact.”

 

For the economist and professor Naercio Menezes Filho, holder of the Ruth Cardoso Chair at Insper, it is necessary to consider particularities: “There will be specific situations in which it will be difficult for small companies to bear [the increase in costs], if there is no increase in productivity. Therefore, everything has to be done calmly.”

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

__________________________________

03/24/2026

 

BRAZIL WEIGHS R$15BN PACKAGE FOR SECTORS HIT BY TARIFFS AND WAR

Credit line is part of broader effort to cushion impact on fuel prices and exposed industries

 

 

The government is preparing a provisional presidential decree to launch “Brazil Sovereign Plan 2,” and under the scenario now being considered, it is studying a R$15 billion credit line to support sectors affected by new U.S. tariffs and the war involving Iran.

 

Of that total, about R$10 billion could come from the Annual Budget Law, with another R$5 billion from the Export Guarantee Fund, using resources left over from the first phase of the program. The issue is still under discussion by government teams.

 

The debate is taking place amid a broader discussion within the government over a package of measures to mitigate the effects of the conflict, especially on fuel prices and the sectors most exposed. One alternative under review is to increase subsidies for diesel producers and importers through a new provisional presidential decree, or MP.

 

MP No. 1,340/2026 set a subsidy of R$0.32 per liter, with an estimated fiscal impact of R$10 billion for the federal government through extraordinary credit, an expense that falls outside the spending cap but is counted toward the primary balance target. If that option moves forward, the cost could rise through an increase in the subsidy amount via a new MP adjusting the current parameters.

 

Government officials believe there is enough revenue to fund this package of measures, especially given the increase in tax collection linked to higher Brent crude prices, without the need to declare a public calamity.

 

Teams have been monitoring developments on a daily basis in a scenario marked by high volatility abroad, amid the conflict in the Middle East, and its effects on the domestic market, in order to calibrate possible measures. Brazil Sovereign Plan 2 may be announced before the broader package or at the same time. The final decision will rest with President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

 

The government is also betting on reaching an agreement with state governors. As Valor reported last week, the states have reservations about the federal government’s proposal to cut to zero the state value-added tax on goods and services, or ICMS, on imported diesel and have begun discussing an alternative based on direct subsidies for importers. The issue was discussed on Friday (20) in a meeting between state finance secretaries and National Treasury Secretary Rogério Ceron.

 

Under that model, each state would grant the subsidy to the importer, with a partial reimbursement later made by the federal government, in a cost-sharing arrangement with half borne by the states and half by the federal government. The states agreed to draft a structured proposal along those lines, while the economic team agreed to formalize a compensation model.

 

The subsidy amount is still being studied by the states, but talks have included an estimated cost of R$2 billion a month for each side — states and federal government.

 

Subnational governments also raised the possibility of increasing federal compensation to 70% of the losses, but the Finance Ministry resisted the change, stressing the collaborative nature of the proposal.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

 

____________________________________

03/24/2026

 

THE PRESENT AND FUTURE OF THE BRAZIL-CHINA RELATIONSHIP

Valor brings together officials and business leaders in Shanghai to discuss business prospects

 

The present and future of economic relations between Brazil and China will be in the spotlight from Wednesday (25) to Friday (27) in Shanghai and its metropolitan area. Officials, diplomats, business leaders, investors, academics and analysts from both countries will participate, on the first day of the event, in the “Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-China 2026,” promoted by Valor in association with the Brazilian Center for International Relations (Cebri) and the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries (CPAFFC), to discuss opportunities in bilateral relations. Visits to Chinese companies’ operations will complete the program on the other two days, allowing an exchange of information and experiences on innovation.

 

Brazil’s largest trading partner for almost two decades, China’s business with Brazil has increased even further in recent years. Numbers from the Secretariat for Foreign Trade (Secex/Mdic) indicate that last year Brazilian shipments to China reached $99.9 billion, up 5.9% compared with 2024. Imports also had a stronger expansion (11.4%), totaling $70.9 billion. And for 2026, economists project a continuation of this trend. A study by the Brazil-China Business Council (CEBC) indicates that the volume of Chinese investments in Brazil in 2024 totaled $77.5 billion, placing the Asian nation as the fifth largest foreign investor in the country.

 

Participants in the summit’s opening include Marcos Galvão, Brazilian ambassador to China; Marcos Caramuru, international advisor to Cebri and former Brazilian ambassador to China; Shen Xin, vice-president of CPAFFC; Chen Jing, vice-president of the Standing Committee of the Shanghai Municipal People’s Congress; Frederic Kachar, general director of Editora Globo and Sistema Globo de Rádio (SGR); and Maria Fernanda Delmas, editor-in-chief of Valor.

 

Next, eight panels will address the main economic connections between the two countries: “Brazil and China on the Global Chessboard: Strategies for a World with New Trade Relations,” “Brazil and China in the Global Leadership of the Energy Transition and Critical Minerals,” “Logistics and Infrastructure: Lines Connecting Ports, Rails and Chinese Investment in Brazil,” “Forging the Future: Health, AI and Emerging Sectors in Brazil-China Collaboration,” “Agribusiness – Food Security and the Next Growth Cycle of Brazilian Agriculture with China,” “Mobility of the Future: Chinese Industrial Plans in Brazil,” “Green Corridors: Developing the Low-Carbon Fuel Market in the Brazil-China Aviation and Maritime Transport” and “Paths to a Robust Finance Ecosystem.”

 

In the first panel, the debaters will be Izabella Teixeira, international advisory board member of Cebri and former minister of the environment; ambassador Marcos Galvão; Fang Li, chief representative of the Beijing Office of the World Resources Institute (WRI); Xu Tianqi, deputy director of the Department of Regional Studies at the Renmin University of China’s Chongyang Institute of Financial Studies; and Briza Bueno, general manager in Brazil of AliExpress.

 

The discussion on the role of critical minerals in the energy transition will feature Ricardo Lima, CEO of Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração (CBMM); Jorge Arbache, professor of economics at the University of Brasília; Gu Haidong, vice-mayor of Suzhou; Han Zhao, senior investment executive at the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB); Marcelo Sampaio, executive director of legal and institutional affairs at Vale Minerals China; and Shelley Wang, head of the Brazil unit of Hexing Electrical.

 

Logistics and infrastructure issues will be discussed by panelists Leonardo Ribeiro, secretary of rail transport at Brazil’s Ministry of Transportation; Gao Liang, vice-president of the China Overseas Engineering Group; Li Sisheng, executive vice-president of Powerchina International; Ding Songbing, general manager and head of the Strategy and Research Department at Shanghai International Port; and Zhang Jianyu, deputy secretary-general and chief director of Development at the Belt and Road Alliance for Green Development.

 

The panel on health and artificial intelligence will include Igor Marchesini Ferreira, special advisor to the Ministry of Finance; Shirley Lu Han, specialist at the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Medicines and Health Products (CCCMHPIE); Felipe Daud, director of institutional relations for the Alibaba Group in Latin America; Leticia Frazão Leme, minister counselor at the Brazilian Embassy in Beijing; Chen Weijing, deputy director at the Hangzhou Municipal Commerce Agency; Zhou Yong, CMO of Hangzhou StarSpecies Robotics; and Hui Jingbo, marketing director at Hangzhou Zhizhen Technology.

 

The panel focused on agribusiness will bring together Pablo Machado, executive vice-president of business in China and strategy at Suzano; Kevin Chen, international dean at the Chinese Academy of Rural Development (CARD); Larry Lin, chief representative at Minerva’s office in China; André Guimarães, executive director at Ipam; Inty Mendoza, chief representative for China at CNA/Senar; and Tian Lei, president of the Tianjin Meat Producers Association.

 

The discussion on mobility and the automotive industry will include Sidney Levy, president of Invest.Rio; Victor Oliveira de Queiroz, general manager at the ApexBrasil office in Beijing; Priscila Sakalen, secretary of transportation and urban mobility of the State of Rio de Janeiro; Cui Hongbin (August), director of international energy systems’ projects for Latin America at CATL.

 

The panel on green fuels will feature Sergio Peres, professor at the University of Pernambuco (UPE); Larissa Wachholz, senior fellow at Cebri; Feng An, executive director at the Energy and Transportation Innovation Center (iCET); Shen Wang, CEO of SafPac; Li Zhenglong, vice-director at Zhejiang University; and Xia Shubiao, manager of the R&D center for security technology at China Marine Bunker.

 

The summit’s closing will bring together, to discuss financing mechanisms, Ricardo Damiani, representative of Banco do Brasil in China; ambassador Marcos Caramuru; Lucas Reis, senior leader of climate finance at BNDES; Li Zhiqing, executive director of the Institute of Green Finance at Fudan University; Wu Changhua, representative of the Global Climate Academy; Liao Shuping, senior researcher at the Bank of China Research Institute; and Ruiming Song, special climate advisor at Century City Holdings.

 

The panels will be moderated by Fernanda Delmas; Zínia Baeta, executive editor of Valor; Lucas de Vitta, assistant editor at Valor; Maria Luiza Filgueiras, editor of Pipeline; Marli Olmos, special reporter for Valor; and Marcelo Ninio, correspondent for O Globo in Beijing.

 

In addition to the debates, which will take place at the Mandarin Oriental hotel, the program includes two days of visits to companies that have become prominent worldwide for the technological innovations introduced in their sectors of activity. At Alibaba, artificial intelligence and cloud environment solutions will be the focus; at JD (Jingdong Group, China’s largest retailer), logistics; at Fourier, robotics; at Envision, energy transition.

 

The “Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-China 2026” is the third event of its kind promoted by Valor in China since 2024. This edition is sponsored by BYD, the City of Rio de Janeiro through Invest.Rio, Embratur, the Government of the State of Rio de Janeiro, and ApexBrasil, with support from the City of São Paulo and São Paulo Negócios, Suzano, CBMM, Alibaba, the World Resources Institute, the Climate and Society Institute (iCS), CNA Senar, and the National Confederation of Industry (CNI). The panels will be broadcast on Valor’s website and social media. There will be English-language coverage on Valor International. The newspaper will not cover any expenses for public officials participating in the debates.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

____________________________________

 

03/25/2026

 

CHINA EYES BRAZIL RAIL AND PORTS, WARNS ON TAXES

Brazilian government says expanding transport infrastructure is a priority and that it is working to improve legal certainty and unlock private investment

 

China sees major investment opportunities in Brazil’s rail and port infrastructure, but the complexity of the country’s tax system is still viewed as a significant obstacle. Expanding the sector is one of the Brazilian government’s priorities, and officials say they are working to increase legal certainty and unlock private investment.

 

The issue was discussed during the panel “Logistics and Infrastructure: Connections Linking Ports, Railways and Chinese Investment in Brazil” at the Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-China 2026 on Wednesday (25) in Shanghai. The event is organized by Valor Econômico in association with the Brazilian Center for International Relations (Cebri) and the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries (CPAFFC). The panel was moderated by Valor Executive Editor Zínia Baeta.

 

“The biggest barrier in Brazil is the legal and tax environment, which is highly fragmented,” said Li Sisheng, executive vice president of Power China International. In his view, that helps explain why some foreign companies have struggled with investments in the country. He noted, however, that the company has $4 billion invested in Brazil and is studying projects in highways, railways, and energy.

 

Leonardo Ribeiro, rail transport secretary at Brazil’s Transport Ministry, said the government wants to raise railways’ share of the country’s transport matrix from 20% to 35%. According to Ribeiro, Brazil’s Railway Legal Framework now provides laws, regulations, and standardized contracts that ensure legal certainty for investment in the sector. “We also have strategies to provide guarantees so these projects can move forward under a risk-sharing structure in which the government will share with the private sector any extreme situations.”

 

Ding Songbing, general manager and head of strategy and research at Shanghai International Port, said there is ample room for the development and modernization of Brazilian ports.

 

“Ships are getting larger, and ports need to adapt,” he said. In his view, climate adaptation as well as automation and digitalization of processes are two other areas with strong potential.

 

Zhang Jianyu, deputy secretary-general and chief development director of the Belt and Road International Green Development Alliance, said China and Chinese stock exchanges have been tightening environmental requirements for companies, and those rules also apply to their operations abroad. “If a Chinese company does not have good sustainability results in the Brazilian market, for example, it will face difficulties raising capital here in China.”

 

The “Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-China 2026” is the third event of its kind organized by the newspaper in China since 2024. This edition is sponsored by BYD, the Rio city government through Invest.Rio, Embratur, the Rio de Janeiro state government, and ApexBrasil, with support from the São Paulo city government and São Paulo Negócios, Suzano, CBMM, Alibaba, the World Resources Institute, the Climate and Society Institute (iCS), CNA Senar, and the National Confederation of Industry (CNI).

 

The newspaper does not cover expenses when public officials invited to take part in the discussions attend the event.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

___________________________________

03/25/2026

 

COPOM URGES CAUTION WHILE MARKETS PRICE IN MORE RATE CUTS

Brazil’s Monetary Policy Committee leaves room to speed up easing, while a pause looks less likely unless war triggers broader market s

 

The minutes of the Central Bank of Brazil’s latest Monetary Policy Committee, or COPOM, meeting reinforced the market’s view that the country remains in an easing cycle.

 

By Tuesday (24), the interpretation had gained ground that, even with the war in the Middle East and uncertainty over oil prices, a pause in rate cuts now appears less likely than a possible acceleration in the pace of monetary easing.

 

The committee sought to sound cautious, saying that its next steps would be determined “over time” amid an uncertain backdrop made even more complex by the war in the Middle East. Even so, it signaled the continuation of a Selic “calibration” cycle after lowering the base rate last week to 14.75% from 15%.

 

Among market participants, the minutes largely reinforced the message already delivered in the meeting statement. In the section explaining its decision, the committee said that “recent events” would not prevent the materialization of the guidance it had given in January, when it judged that the start of an interest-rate cutting cycle would be appropriate.

 

COPOM said it had analyzed “the options for the pace of the start of the base-rate calibration cycle” and concluded that a 25-basis-point cut was the most appropriate move at this stage. “The magnitude and duration of the calibration cycle will be determined over time, as new information is incorporated into its analyses,” it said.

 

In economists’ view, that passage shows an asymmetry in COPOM’s thinking. It would take a worsening of the war, with additional effects on oil prices and the exchange rate, to interrupt the cutting cycle, while any improvement in the external backdrop could allow the pace of cuts to accelerate to 50 basis points with fewer obstacles.

 

Felipe Sichel, chief economist at Porto Asset, said the minutes brought little new compared with the statement and made clear that COPOM believes rates remain highly restrictive and are having the expected effect on activity.

 

“The main discussion was about pace and about confirming that we are, in fact, in a rate-cutting cycle. The bar for interrupting that process is currently very high. Barring a disruption in the exchange rate and oil prices, the next moves remain Selic cuts,” he said.

 

According to BTG Pactual’s team, led by Tiago Berriel, the minutes reinforced a dovish tone by remaining broadly neutral relative to the Central Bank’s earlier communication.

 

“The minutes are consistent with the view that COPOM left the door open both to accelerate and to maintain the 25-basis-point pace ahead, depending on how the geopolitical backdrop evolves. The bar for interrupting the cycle seems high to us. So if the current scenario holds, our call remains for the cycle to continue with a 25-basis-point cut at the next meeting. A reduction in uncertainty with positive effects on energy prices would lead to an acceleration to a 50-basis-point move,” they said.

 

War clouds outlook

 

For Itaú Unibanco, the minutes suggest the Central Bank remains confident in its ability to calibrate the degree of monetary restriction.

 

COPOM said the magnitude and duration of the cycle will depend on incoming information.

 

In recent weeks, the war involving Israel, Iran, and the United States has added uncertainty and pushed oil prices higher. Brent crude has traded above $100 a barrel.

 

“That decision [to cut rates and wait for new information] is consistent with the current scenario, in which the duration and extent of geopolitical conflicts, as well as mixed signals about the pace of economic slowdown and its effects on price levels, make it harder to identify clear trends,” the committee said.

 

The market was also trying to understand why COPOM projected inflation at 3.3% over its relevant policy horizon, well below what economists had expected.

 

According to the committee, the oil price is assumed to follow the futures curve for the next six months and then rise 2% a year thereafter. “Given the observed Brent futures curve, this framework translated into a declining path in the second half of the year, after a sharp increase in the short term,” COPOM said.

 

“In practice, that meant an upward revision to short-term inflation, but with a partial reversal over the relevant horizon, helping keep the projection relatively lower for the third quarter of 2027,” BTG Pactual said.

 

For Itaú Unibanco’s economics team, led by former Central Bank director Mario Mesquita, the minutes indicate that the authority remains confident in its ability to calibrate the level of monetary restriction despite the global turbulence. “In fact, the minutes suggest that only the options of a 25-basis-point cut or a 50-basis-point cut were on the table,” the bank’s economists wrote.

 

According to Itaú, COPOM also highlighted that the disinflation process has lost momentum in more recent readings, something that was not in the statement, and that a possible reacceleration in activity in the first quarter “will not imply a major change in its current scenario.” In that sense, the bank said, the minutes are consistent with an acceleration in the pace of Selic cuts in April, to 50 basis points, which would take the rate to 14.25%.

 

Split signals

 

J.P. Morgan economists led by Cassiana Fernandez share the view that the next meeting could bring a larger cut. For the bank, the minutes signaled further easing, even as they stressed the uncertainty created by the war and played down the recent improvement in activity data. “It will be important to watch how the Central Bank handles these mixed signals in its estimate of the output gap,” they said.

 

For J.P. Morgan, the minutes brought little new on inflation. “The Central Bank referred to the inflation process using past-tense verbs, which probably reflects the expected impact of the conflict, already incorporated into the projections, on the IPCA inflation index. The Central Bank highlighted that inflation expectations had been falling before the conflict, but have risen again since then,” the U.S. bank’s economists said in a report.

 

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

 

_____________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

Soybean prices rose in March as higher oil prices boosted soybean oil and biodiesel demand — Foto: Be8 (Divulgação)
Soybean prices rose in March as higher oil prices boosted soybean oil and biodiesel demand — Photo: Be8 (Divulgação)

The war in the Middle East was the main driver behind higher prices for some agricultural commodities in March. Rising oil prices pushed soybean oil up more than 13% on the Chicago Board of Trade last month, lifting soybean prices along with it. The increase in crude also drove gains in sugar and cotton prices in New York.

When oil prices rise, demand for soybean oil increases because it is used to make biodiesel, a renewable fuel alternative when fossil-fuel products such as diesel become more expensive. According to Valor Data, soybeans ended March up 4.2%, with the average price of second-month contracts, typically the most liquid, reaching $11.85 a bushel.

Supply-and-demand fundamentals had suggested soybean prices would fall, but geopolitical instability was so intense that the opposite happened, said Marcela Marini, senior grains analyst at Rabobank.

“If not for this geopolitical factor, soybeans could be trading lower, in response to the supply-and-demand backdrop,” she said. “Brazil is harvesting a record crop and Chinese demand is not rising in the same proportion as supply,” she added.

The biggest gain in Chicago was wheat, which ended the month up 8.5%, with an average price of $6.02 a bushel. Élcio Bento, an analyst at Safras & Mercado, said that expectations of a smaller U.S. wheat planting area were key to that increase.

U.S. farmers are expected to plant 17.6 million hectares of wheat in the 2026-27 season, which, if confirmed, would be the smallest area since 1919, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In the previous season, planted area totaled 18.33 million hectares.

Bento noted that the Middle East conflict spilled over into the wheat market especially after the Houthis, the armed group from Yemen, said they could join the war in support of Iran and threatened to disrupt cargo flows through the Suez Canal.

“That raises logistics costs for wheat coming from Europe, Russia and Ukraine. On the other hand, it benefits other major producers using different routes, such as Argentina and Australia, as well as the United States, which may see stronger demand and firmer prices,” he said.

Corn prices also rose in Chicago. Futures climbed 5.7% to an average of $4.64 a bushel. According to Rabobank’s Marini, strong demand for U.S. corn, with record shipments and higher biofuel consumption, helped lift prices.

Sugar rises with oil

In New York, the sharp rise in oil prices had a direct effect on sugar, which climbed 8.1% to 14.93 cents a pound. More expensive oil directly affects sugar supply because it tends to improve ethanol’s competitiveness against gasoline in Brazil. That encourages Brazilian sugar mills to divert more cane toward biofuel production, reducing sugar output from the world’s largest producer and exporter.

“The consolidation of oil above $100 and the lack of signs that we will see a ceasefire are making the market increasingly aware that gasoline will become more expensive. At the same time, ethanol is becoming more attractive in the production mix relative to sugar,” said Marcelo Filho, a market intelligence analyst at StoneX.

Cotton also rose alongside oil. Futures for the fiber gained 6% in March, averaging 68.29 cents a pound. When oil becomes more expensive, synthetic fabrics also rise in price, which opens the way for stronger demand for natural fibers such as cotton.

Also in New York, frozen concentrated orange juice rose 3.4% to an average of $1.82 a pound. Arabica coffee ended the month up 1.2%, at $2.94 a pound.

Among soft commodities, only cocoa fell in March, still under pressure from abundant supply and weak demand. Futures dropped 9.9% to an average of $3,26 a tonne.

*By Paulo Santos — Campina Grande

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

JBS is set to inaugurate a research center in Florianópolis focused on the development of cultivated protein. Named JBS Biotech, the facility has been designed to operate across the full value chain—from early-stage research to industrial scale—in the market for lab-built protein supplements derived from cells similar to animal muscle tissue.

The multinational’s biotechnology arm aims to advance research and development to produce “superproteins” with tailored characteristics. According to CEO Gilberto Tomazoni, “it is not meat, but cultivated protein.”

Lab-produced biotechnology will serve as a food supplement ingredient to be used in shakes, cereal bars, and JBS products. Tomazoni added that the goal of JBS Biotech is to accelerate proof-of-concept work and pave the way for future industrial-scale applications.

The new complex includes more than 20 laboratories spread across 4,000 square meters at the Sapiens Parque innovation center. Chemical engineer Fernanda Berti, who holds a postdoctoral degree from the European Institute of Excellence in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, will lead the division.

Four years ago, JBS announced a $100 million investment to enter the cultivated protein segment. The outlay included the construction of the biotechnology center in Florianópolis, which received $37 million, and, in Spain, the first cultivated protein plant of BioTech Foods, in which the multinational is the majority shareholder.

Berti said the research center in Santa Catarina’s capital focuses on developing technology rather than finished products—namely functional proteins and bioactive ingredients that complement JBS’s existing portfolio. “We are entering a new frontier, where it is possible to understand the potential of protein-based foods at the molecular level and develop solutions with tailored nutritional and functional characteristics for different consumer needs,” she said.

The global protein supplements market is estimated to have generated $30 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $63 billion by 2033, growing at an average annual rate of 10.3% between 2026 and 2033, according to U.S. market research firm Grand View Research. The consultancy said rising awareness of health and wellness is driving the segment.

Tomazoni said consumer behavior is increasingly focused on longevity and quality of life. “Now we have the [weight-loss] injections, a medical technology that has been changing consumer behavior. This is a group seeking advanced precision nutrition,” he said.

*By Marcos Fantin, Globo Rural — São Paulo

Source:Valor International
https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

 

Iochpe-Maxion plant in Castaños, Mexico: revenue declines as an indirect effect of tariffs — Foto: Divulgação
Iochpe-Maxion plant in Castaños, Mexico: revenue declines as an indirect effect of tariffs — Photo: Divulgação

Gunmaker Taurus expects at some point to recover $18 million it paid in export tariffs to the United States, charges that were struck down in February by the country’s Supreme Court.

Like Taurus, other large Brazilian companies with exports to the U.S. or production in North America spent the second half of 2025 trying to find ways around the impact of Washington’s tariff offensive.

Now that fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 earnings season has passed, manufacturers such as Tupy, Iochpe-Maxion, WEG and Taurus itself are calculating the damage U.S. tariffs inflicted on their results.

“Our war is over,” Taurus Chief Executive Salesio Nuhs said on the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call, referring to the end of the 50% tariff that had been applied to shipments to the U.S.

Firearms were not included on the list of products exempted from the 40% surcharge announced by U.S. President Donald Trump in July last year, which was added to the initial 10% “reciprocal” tariff.

Indirect damage

Brazilian multinational Iochpe-Maxion, which operates in 14 countries producing vehicle wheels and components for the transport industry, faced a R$700 million hit to revenue because of the tariff shock. Since it has four plants in Mexico and the U.S., the company did not suffer direct effects from the tariffs, as products made in Mexico are exempt when shipped to the U.S. market under regional trade agreements.

But its production was hurt by a drop in sales volumes of steel wheels and chassis for heavy trucks. The impact was indirect: as tariffs reduced U.S. imports, freight volumes and freight prices fell, weakening transport operators’ appetite to renew fleets.

“The drop in volumes was much more related to weaker end demand than to a direct effect from tariffs,” Renato Salum, Iochpe-Maxion’s finance and investor relations director, told Valor. “The decline in truck production in North America last year was more an indirect than a direct consequence of the tariffs. The end buyer does not immediately feel the inflationary impact on prices, which increases uncertainty and leads to postponed purchase decisions, affecting demand throughout the chain, including in Mexico,” Salum said.

In financial terms, Iochpe-Maxion saw “a reduction of roughly R$700 million in revenue, equivalent to about 35% of revenue in North American structural components,” he said.

Based on conversations with clients and analysis from specialized consultancies, the company expects demand to normalize in the second half of 2026.

“That view is supported by rising orders for heavy-duty vehicles since late 2025, a trend that strengthened at the start of this year.”

Rising prices

For Taurus, a new 10% tariff announced by Trump on the same day as the court ruling, under a different legal provision in U.S. trade law, was largely offset by the 7% price increase the company imposed on its products in the U.S. at the start of the tariff shock, according to Nuhs.

To reduce the impact, the company also activated assembly lines at its Taurus USA subsidiary in Georgia, shifting to exports of parts, which carry lower value than fully assembled products. All pistols in the G family are now made at the U.S. unit.

“In addition, we took radical measures on productivity, whether through headcount reduction or changes in our production processes,” Nuhs told Valor. Even so, Taurus estimates it paid $18 million in tariffs in 2025 and early this year.

The company hired two law firms in the U.S. to seek reimbursement of those tariffs and recently decided to continue with only one.

Mixed picture

Foundry group Tupy cited the tariff shock as one of the factors pressuring sales of structural components such as engine blocks and cylinder heads in its fourth-quarter performance. Net revenue from that segment fell 5.1% year on year, to R$1.31 billion in the period.

For this year, Tupy’s management said on the earnings call that it sees positive signs in the external environment, with reduced tariff-related uncertainty translating into higher orders from automakers, which should lift Tupy’s production from the second half onward. The company declined to comment.

In a report, analysts at Banco Safra said the removal of the 50% tariff should improve the electrical equipment manufacturer WEG’s competitiveness, allowing it to resume direct exports from Brazil to the U.S. rather than relying on Mexico as an intermediary.

In an interview with Valor in October last year, Chief Financial Officer André Rodrigues said the company’s Mexican unit was almost entirely dedicated to the U.S. market.

On the fourth-quarter earnings call, after the tariffs were struck down, Rodrigues said it was still too early to draw a new scenario and noted that the 50% tariff on imports of steel, aluminum and several related products remains in force under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act.

In a note on the results, Citi said that although revenue remained under pressure, WEG’s 34% gross margin in the fourth quarter suggests the company “is improving its mix and dealing with tariff effects more quickly than the market had anticipated.” WEG declined to comment.

*By Nelson Rocco — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

A exigência de pagamento por material cirúrgico em um procedimento já autorizado, sem a prestação de informações claras ao consumidor sobre custos adicionais, torna o débito controvertido e afasta a possibilidade de restrição de crédito.

 

 

 

 

1 de abril de 2026

 

Pixabay

médicos fazendo cirurgia

Operadora foi proibida de negativar nome de paciente por dívida com material cirúrgico

 

Com base neste entendimento, a magistrada Fabiana Calil Canfour de Almeida, da 7ª Turma do Núcleo 4.0 em Segundo Grau do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo, concedeu liminar para proibir uma operadora de saúde e um hospital de inscreverem o nome de um paciente em cadastros de inadimplentes.

O litígio teve início após um beneficiário de plano de saúde na modalidade “livre escolha” passar por uma cirurgia de alta complexidade na coluna cervical. O procedimento teve aprovação prévia da operadora. Durante a operação, os médicos usaram materiais implantáveis indispensáveis ao sucesso da intervenção, como placas, parafusos e enxerto ósseo sintético.

Após a alta hospitalar, o consumidor foi surpreendido com uma cobrança direta do hospital referente aos insumos, no valor de R$ 79 mil. Ele narrou que não teve acesso a nenhuma informação prévia e específica sobre limitações de cobertura ou a apresentação de um orçamento detalhado antes de sua internação.

Diante da cobrança inesperada, o paciente ajuizou uma ação requerendo que a operadora cobrisse integralmente as despesas. Ele também pediu uma tutela de urgência para impedir a restrição de seu nome enquanto a validade da dívida fosse discutida. O juízo de primeira instância negou o pedido liminar.

Inconformado, o autor apresentou um Agravo de Instrumento ao TJ-SP. Ele argumentou que a decisão gerava risco de dano irreparável, uma vez que os insumos cobrados foram usados em uma cirurgia eletiva prescrita e aprovada. Afirmou ainda que os materiais não são acessórios, mas partes indissociáveis do ato médico, o que evidenciaria a falha no dever de transparência.

Proteção ao consumidor

Ao analisar o recurso, a relatora acolheu os argumentos do autor e concedeu a tutela de urgência. A magistrada apontou que a situação exigia a proteção do consumidor contra o risco de restrição de crédito, já que os valores exigidos ainda estão em discussão judicial.

“Analisados os argumentos do agravante, por medida de cautela, há que se deferir o efeito ativo pleiteado, para o fim de determinar que as rés se abstenham de inscrever ou manter o nome do autor, ora agravado, nos cadastros de proteção ao crédito, relativamente ao débito discutido nos autos”, determinou a magistrada.

A decisão ordenou que a cobrança coercitiva não seja feita até o julgamento final da demanda, estipulando a aplicação de multa diária de R$ 500 em caso de descumprimento. A relatora destacou que todos os demais pontos do litígio serão analisados de forma aprofundada pelo colegiado no julgamento do mérito recursal.

Agravo de Instrumento 4019195-92.2026.8.26.0000

Fonte: Conjur

Relator do TJ/RJ condicionou viagem ao pagamento de R$ 97 mil como garantia de cumprimento de eventual pena e indenização.
Injúria racial

 

01 de abril de 2026

O desembargador Luciano Silva Barreto, do TJ/RJ, autorizou a advogada argentina Agostina Páez, acusada de injúria racial, a voltar para a Argentina após o fim da instrução, mediante caução e manutenção das obrigações processuais.

Segundo a promotoria, ela ofendeu três funcionários de um bar em Ipanema, em janeiro, com expressões racistas e gestos imitando um macaco, condutas registradas em vídeo.

Medidas cautelares revistas após instrução

Ao analisar o pedido, o desembargador concluiu que, com o fim da instrução, as medidas cautelares já não eram mais necessárias, pois não havia atos processuais que exigissem a permanência da acusada no Brasil. Por isso, entendeu que a proibição de saída do país não se justificava no atual estágio da ação penal.

Ele também destacou que o MP e a assistência de acusação concordaram com a liberação, desde que fosse fixada uma garantia financeira para assegurar eventual indenização às vítimas. Na avaliação do desembargador, a negativa do pedido contrariou a posição convergente da acusação sem apresentar fundamento concreto bastante para manter cautelares tão gravosas.

Como condição para deixar o Brasil, a advogada deverá pagar R$ 97 mil, valor equivalente a 60 salários mínimos, a título de caução. A quantia funcionará como garantia para cumprimento de eventual pena e reparação de danos. Mesmo fora do país, a acusada deverá manter endereço e contatos atualizados, além de se apresentar à Justiça brasileira sempre que necessário.

O relator também considerou que a advogada é primária, possui profissão definida e colaborou com o andamento do processo, inclusive com manifestação pública de arrependimento. Para ele, esses elementos enfraquecem a hipótese de fuga.

Na decisão, o desembargador avaliou ainda que impedir a saída do país após o encerramento da instrução configuraria constrangimento indevido. Ressaltou que acordos internacionais entre Brasil e Argentina permitem que, em caso de condenação, a pena seja cumprida no país de origem.

Por fim, assinalou que a repercussão do caso não autoriza, por si só, a manutenção da restrição.

O caso

O episódio ocorreu em janeiro deste ano, em um bar localizado em Ipanema, zona Sul do Rio de Janeiro.

Segundo a investigação, Agostina Páez se envolveu em uma discussão após discordar do valor da conta e passou a dirigir ofensas de cunho racista a funcionários do estabelecimento.

De acordo com os relatos, ela chamou um dos empregados de “negro” de forma pejorativa e, em seguida, utilizou a expressão “mono” – termo que significa “macaco” em espanhol -, além de imitar gestos e sons do animal. As ofensas teriam sido reiteradas contra outros trabalhadores, inclusive fora do bar.

Em 18 de janeiro, a Justiça determinou a apreensão do passaporte e o uso de tornozeleira eletrônica, a pedido da Polícia Civil, como medidas cautelares durante a investigação.

Posteriormente, em 6 de fevereiro, após o oferecimento da denúncia pelo MP/RJ, o juiz de Direito da 37ª vara Criminal do Rio de Janeiro decretou a prisão preventiva da acusada, sob fundamento de reiteração das condutas e gravidade dos fatos.

No mesmo dia, no entanto, a prisão foi revogada, sendo mantidas as medidas cautelares, como a proibição de deixar o país e o monitoramento eletrônico.

A denúncia aponta que os relatos das vítimas foram corroborados por testemunhas, imagens de câmeras de segurança e outros registros produzidos no momento dos fatos, afastando a versão defensiva de que os gestos teriam sido mera brincadeira.

Desde então, Agostina respondia ao processo em liberdade, no Brasil, sob monitoramento, enquanto aguarda a sentença.

Processo: 0020717-23.2026.8.19.0000

Fonte: https://www.migalhas.com.br/quentes/452976/desembargador-autoriza-advogada-que-imitou-macaco-a-deixar-o-pais