04/23/2025


Latin America is emerging as a relative winner in a rapidly changing global landscape, with Brazil poised to benefit from the trend, according to Santander Executive Chair Ana Botín.

Speaking Tuesday at an event hosted by the bank at its New York headquarters, Ms. Botín pointed to geopolitical and economic factors creating momentum for deeper integration between Latin America and the United States. She said the reconfiguration of the global order is here to stay, noting that the shift in global supply chains is opening up opportunities to serve markets such as China. “I believe Latin America will continue to come out ahead—relatively speaking—even if it’s hard to make precise forecasts.”

Brazil, in particular, may be less vulnerable to short-term inflationary pressures stemming from new trade tariffs due to its relatively closed economy, Ms. Botín said. At the same time, the country has room to expand its export base. “We’re already seeing increased demand for soybeans from China,” she said. “There will be volatility, but the outlook for Brazil is positive.”

Europe, too, is beginning to benefit from the new global context. According to Ms. Botín, some of the world’s largest institutional investors—mainly American—are shifting more capital toward Europe while reducing exposure to the U.S. “We held a financial sector conference in London a few weeks ago, and I’ve never seen this much interest in European investment,” she said. “There is a rebalancing of capital from the U.S. to Europe.”

In this environment, Ms. Botín expressed support for finalizing the long-delayed trade agreement between the European Union and Mercosur. “All the work is done. The only thing left is the signature,” she said. “There is a lot of interest from Europe in moving forward with the deal, which we know depends on one major European country—I won’t name it, but it’s not Spain or Germany,” she added, referring to France.

Ms. Botín argued that Latin American countries are better positioned today than in past decades to navigate the evolving global order. “Institutional strength has improved. We had a decade of growth, and the region’s fundamentals are more solid now than in previous cycles.”

Praised earlier this year by U.S. President Donald Trump for her “fantastic job” leading Santander, Ms. Botín avoided direct criticism of his trade policies. The Spanish bank has a significant presence in the United States. Rather than challenge President Trump’s rhetoric head-on, she has opted to highlight the opportunities his approach might create for Europe. A month ago, she remarked that Europe is awakening, and the alarm clock has been President Trump.”

She also took a measured tone when addressing Mr. Trump’s recent pressure on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, which has stirred volatility in financial markets. Ms. Botín emphasized the critical role central banks play as anchors of financial stability and stressed the importance of preserving their independence. “It’s not unusual for governments and central banks to have different views—that’s something we need to monitor,” she said, adding that she is confident that institutional independence “will be upheld.”

Declining to speculate on the Fed’s next moves, Ms. Botín said Santander is working with a baseline scenario that sees interest rates in Europe falling to 2% by year-end. In the U.S., she added, any slowdown in economic growth would logically lead to a recalibration of interest rates.

She reiterated that Santander works with all governments in the markets where it operates—and that will remain the case under President Trump.

By Talita Moreira — New York

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

04/23/2025


Alexandre Silveira — Foto: Heka Producciones/Valor
Alexandre Silveira — Photo: Heka Producciones/Valor

Energy transition, particularly the challenges of expanding renewable energy, took center stage at the third panel of the Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-China 2025, held Wednesday in Shanghai. Brazilian Minister of Mines and Energy Alexandre Silveira stressed the need for multilateralism to confront the climate crisis. “COP30 will be an opportunity to link sustainability to social development and highlight the economic value of natural assets like renewable energy and biodiversity,” he said.

Liu Dehua, executive director of the China-Brazil Energy Center at Tsinghua University, noted that with the United States backing away from climate commitments, Brazil and China have emerged as the most important players in the global climate agenda. “We now have many opportunities for mutual cooperation,” he said, pointing to the role Brazilian biomass could play in China’s plan to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2060.

Jorge Arbache, professor of economics at the University of Brasília and a consultant to the Climate and Society Institute, said Brazil is well positioned to contribute to a global low-carbon economy and emphasized its alignment with China in the energy transition. “Beyond natural capital and abundant resources, Brazil is attractive to investors because of its low geopolitical risk,” he said.

Panelists also highlighted the potential for technology transfer in Brazil-China cooperation. Victor Zhang, chief energy expert at Huawei Digital Power, said Brazil’s Northeast region has vast wind and solar potential, but its ultra-high voltage transmission networks require dynamic adjustments to maintain voltage stability. “That’s why we’ve developed competitive smart grid solutions and can transfer this technology to support Brazil’s sustainable energy transition,” he said.

Sun Tao, chairman of State Grid Brazil Holding, recalled that the company has been operating in Brazil since 2010 and continues to invest in the country, applying ultra-high voltage transmission technology. “We are closely following the development of renewable energy and the challenge of transmitting this energy from major production hubs in the Northeast to consumption centers in the Southeast,” he said.

Li Yinsheng, president of China Three Gorges International, acknowledged Brazil’s extensive hydroelectric infrastructure but cautioned that climate variability and capacity limits make it necessary to expand installed generation capacity—especially in light of Brazil’s reindustrialization plans. “Hydropower can be part of the solution, but we are also conducting research to develop alternative energy sources in Brazil,” he said.

Li Sisheng, vice president of Power China International, said Brazil’s competitive edge in renewable energy could position it as a destination for tech-related investment, particularly in data centers designed for artificial intelligence. “AI development is extremely energy-intensive, and Brazil has abundant supply from wind, solar, biomass, and green hydrogen,” he noted.

The summit is organized by Editora Globo and Valor Econômico in partnership with the Brazilian Center for International Relations (Cebri) and Caixin Global; with main sponsorship from BRF and Marfrig; sponsorship from Cedae, ApexBrasil, the Ministry of Development, Industry, Trade and Services, the Rio de Janeiro City Hall, CNA/Senar, BYD, and Huawei; and support from Eletromidia, Vale, CNI, the São Paulo State Government, Ports of Paraná, Suzano, São Paulo City Hall, and FIESP.

*By Carlos Vasconcellos — Rio de Janeiro

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

Event highlights business opportunities in agriculture, mining, car making, smart cities, renewable energy, and technology

04/22/2025

In a bid to deepen ties with its largest trading partner, a Brazilian delegation of officials, experts, and business leaders is in China for the start of the Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-China 2025, kicking off tomorrow (April 22) in Shanghai. Organized by Valor Econômico in partnership with the Brazilian Center for International Relations (Cebri) and Caixin Media, the event aims to spotlight investment and cooperation opportunities across key sectors of the economy.

The opening session will feature Maria Fernanda Delmas, editor-in-chief of Valor Econômico; Frederic Kachar, CEO of Editora Globo and Sistema Globo de Rádio (SGR); Marcos Caramuru, Cebri board member and former Brazilian ambassador to China; Zhang Lihui, president of Caixin Media; Hua Zhong, deputy director-general of the National Development and Reform Commission’s Foreign Capital and Overseas Investment Department (NDRC); Shen Xin, vice-president of the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries (CPAFFC); Dilma Rousseff, president of the New Development Bank (NDB) and former president of Brazil; Alexandre Silveira, Brazil’s minister of Mines and Energy; and Marcos Galvão, Brazil’s ambassador to China.

A panel on smart cities will bring together Ricardo Nunes, mayor of São Paulo; Jesse Efraim Silva Guimarães, vice-president of the Brazil-China Chamber of Commerce (BraCham); Zhang Jianyu, deputy head of research at the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED); Elias Marco Khalil Jabbour, president of Rio de Janeiro’s Pereira Passos Institute; Chen Weiqiang, deputy mayor of Hangzhou; and Gu Haidong, deputy mayor of Suzhou. The session will be moderated by Alan Gripp, editor-in-chief of O Globo.

China’s economic dynamics and their strategic implications for Brazil’s mining and steel sectors will be discussed by Minister Alexandre Silveira; Daniel Abdo, director of International Relations at Sigma Lithium; Tracy Xie, CEO of Vale China; Liu Jianfeng, chief investment officer at CMOC; Liu Qiang, climate director at CIFF; and Joe Zhao, strategy director at Yongfeng Group. Pedro Dias Leite, editorial director at CBN, will moderate the panel.

The energy transition panel will bring together Minister Silveira and experts including Jorge Arbache, economics professor at the University of Brasília, Valor Econômico columnist, and advisor to the Climate and Society Institute (ICS); Victor Zhang, chief energy specialist at Huawei Digital Power; Liu Dehua, executive director of the China-Brazil Energy Center at Tsinghua University; Sun Tao, chairman of State Grid Brazil Holding; Li Yinsheng, president of China Three Gorges International; and Li Sisheng, vice-president of Powerchina International Group.

Agribusiness, a cornerstone of Brazil-China relations, will be the focus of two sessions. The first includes Larissa Wachholz, head of the China program at Cebri; Pablo Gimenez Machado, Asia president of Suzano; Fu Wenge, professor at China Agricultural University; Fernanda Maciel, deputy director of International Relations at CNA-Senar; Guo Junping, assistant director at COFCO Group; and Liu Zhiyong, CEO of CITIC Agriculture.

The second session will address global food security and feature Bruno Machado Ferla, vice-president at BRF; Victor Kengo, engineering director at Portos do Paraná; Yao Jun, CEO of Changrong Group; Gao Guan, vice-president of the China Meat Association (CMA); and Lin Di, sustainable development director at Mengniu Dairy.

Investment opportunities in Brazil will be discussed by Claudio Castro, governor of Rio de Janeiro; Rui Gomes, president of Invest São Paulo; and Victor Queiroz, head of ApexBrasil’s office in China.

Financial cooperation to drive sustainable growth will be addressed by Li Zengxin, executive deputy director at Caixin Global; Marcos Caramuru; Nelson Barbosa, planning director at the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES); Zhao Genrong, vice-president of the Grandview Institution; Chen Weidong, director-general at the Bank of China Research Institute; and Ben Shenglin, dean of the International Business School at Zhejiang University.

The summit will conclude with a panel on the reinvention of the automotive industry featuring Valor journalist Marli Olmos; Alexandre Baldy, vice-president of BYD; Liu Xiaoshi, vice secretary-general of EV100; Rodrigo Zeidan, professor at NYU Shanghai and Fundação Dom Cabral; Zhu Xichan, professor at Tongji University; and Li Fang, director at the World Resources Institute (WRI).

The summit is sponsored by BRF and Marfrig (master sponsors); Cedae, ApexBrasil, Brazil’s Ministry of Development, Industry, Trade and Services, Rio de Janeiro City Hall, CNA/Senar, BYD, and Huawei; and supported by Eletromidia, Vale, CNI, the São Paulo state government, Portos do Paraná, Suzano, São Paulo City Hall, and FIESP.

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Economists urge the country to reduce barriers, improve competitiveness, and embrace global markets as supply chains realign

04/22/2025


Given the ongoing global trade wars, it is increasingly vital for Brazil to address persistent domestic challenges, including poor logistics infrastructure, bureaucratic obstacles, restricted access to quality education, an ineffective public sector, insufficient credit guarantees, and the overall cost of doing business in Brazil, experts advised Valor.

Experts argue that in addition to Brazil’s well-known reform agenda, the United States’ latest tariff hike should also catalyze the country to open its still highly protectionist economy.

Gesner Oliveira, founding partner at GO Associados and professor at Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV), likens the current external shock to a scenario where “the water level drops, and the rotting boats begin to surface.”

“In emerging markets, the need for better infrastructure, less bureaucracy, and a streamlined public sector is already pressing—now it’s urgent. Our tolerance for inefficiency is shrinking rapidly. Only the most competitive economies will survive,” he said.

According to him, the three most critical reforms Brazil needs to seize the moment—what he calls the “Trumpist wave”—are improvements in physical infrastructure, education and vocational training, and rationalization of the public sector.

Amid global instability, Mr. Oliveira sees an opportunity for nations and businesses to rethink their supply chains. He suggests that if Brazil enacts necessary reforms, it could emerge as a strong alternative. “It’s as if everything has been reset, and countries are reconsidering their suppliers. If Brazil can prove itself as a competitive economy with stable market access and quality products, it could benefit from this new order,” he stated.

In this shifting trade landscape, competitive capacity becomes a “matter of life and death,” said Rafael Cagnin, executive director of the Institute for Industrial Development Studies (IEDI). “Improving Brazil’s competitiveness has always been vital, but now it’s critical. The country will only benefit from emerging opportunities if it reaches a competitive level closer to global standards.”

Mr. Cagnin pointed out that Brazil’s high production costs—known as the “Brazil cost,” which compares unfavorably with the average cost structures of OECD countries—“suffocate the country’s ability to seize opportunities and address new challenges.”

Taking a more optimistic view, Aldemir Drummond, strategy professor at Fundação Dom Cabral, sees opportunities for Brazilian sectors with natural competitive advantages, particularly in energy and food security. “In a world where the only certainty is uncertainty,” he said, “Brazil won’t benefit across the board, but there’s room to capitalize in key areas.”

Given the country’s “glaring” fiscal constraints, Mr. Drummond argues that the government should act more as a facilitator than as an investor in the necessary reform agenda. “Nothing is ready yet—Brazil has a lot to do. However, with the fiscal bottleneck we face, the government must focus on enabling reforms rather than directly funding them. Infrastructure is a prime example, where concessions could be accelerated,” said Mr. Drummond, who coordinates the Imagine Brasil project.

Mr. Oliveira noted that Brazil is currently experiencing record levels of infrastructure investment through both traditional privatizations and public-private partnerships (PPPs), strategies being pursued across the political spectrum and at several levels of government.

Another area where Mr. Drummond sees both need and opportunity is in strengthening credit guarantee mechanisms to help stimulate private investment despite high interest rates. “The government could facilitate this by offering guarantees through investment banks or public financial institutions. While it wouldn’t yield immediate results, it could drive progress in the short to medium term.”

According to Mr. Drummond, closer coordination between the public and private sectors is essential for reform. He believes Brazilian society still tends to expect the government to solve all major problems. “It’s important to engage the private sector and promote a convergence of public and private interests, as has worked in the past. Too often, the private sector still seeks subsidies. That may be acceptable for a limited time, but it requires targets and accountability.”

Among the reforms on Brazil’s to-do list, Fernando Veloso, a researcher at FGV’s Brazilian Institute of Economics (FGV Ibre), highlights trade liberalization as the most important. He also sees Brazil potentially benefiting from the ongoing restructuring of global supply chains—but only if the country abandons its protectionist stance. “Brazil needs to finally break from its closed-economy tradition and integrate with global markets by reducing tariffs and non-tariff barriers. There was some liberalization in the 1990s, but little progress since,” Mr. Veloso said.

While the U.S. appears to be retreating from global trade, the same is not true for the rest of the world, he noted. Trade liberalization could better position Brazil for this new environment.

In his view, Brazil has made progress with the approval of tax reform, even if the transition period is long, and has a well-defined reform agenda, including infrastructure upgrades and better credit guarantee mechanisms. “But trade liberalization remains the most delayed agenda item,” he warned.

Mr. Cagnin also supports reinforcing the commercial focus of Brazil’s diplomacy but believes that protective measures are still needed to counter unfair competition.

“It would be good to have a more active foreign trade policy aligned with industrial development goals—using all tools available to guard against unfair competition. Diplomacy could lean more in that direction,” he said.

In a recent Folha de S.Paulo newspaper op-ed, Santander Brasil chief economist Ana Paula Vescovi also emphasized the importance of reforms in the current context.

“Structural reforms are increasingly necessary to enhance competitiveness without resorting to subsidies, which would only worsen public finances and raise interest rates,” she wrote.

According to Ms. Vescovi, progress in tax, administrative, and regulatory reforms could improve systemic efficiency and reduce the Brazil cost, helping mitigate the effects of foreign trade barriers. “By signaling efforts to boost corporate competitiveness—rather than isolating itself, Brazil can turn this challenge into an opportunity and stand as a reliable supplier in global chains that will be increasingly vulnerable to instability,” she added.

*By Lucianne Carneiro — Rio de Janeiro

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Already active in the country through its subsidiaries Alta Genetics, Genex, Transov, and Vas, the American company now plans to bring all other bovine genetics firms in its portfolio to Brazil

04/17/2025


Already active in Brazil through subsidiaries Alta Genetics, Genex, Transova, and Vas, U.S.-based Urus has announced it will begin full-scale operations in the country starting in June. With the expansion, the company will introduce all other bovine genetics businesses in its global portfolio to the Brazilian market, bringing the group’s total operations in the country to eleven.

“This study has been underway for the past two years, with the companies entering individually. Now, they’ll be integrated, and we’ll undoubtedly offer a much stronger solution to the market,” said Heverardo Carvalho, current director of Alta Brasil.

As of June, Mr. Carvalho will step into the role of director of Urus, while Tiago Carrara, currently Alta’s market manager, will assume leadership of Alta Brasil. “Our goal is to work together more efficiently to deliver more consistent results for our clients,” said Mr. Carrara.

With the expanded presence of its parent company, Alta expects to grow 15% in 2025, compared to 8% in 2024. Genex, meanwhile, is forecasting 17% growth this year, up from 15% in 2023.

The group does not disclose revenue figures but reports that Alta and Genex currently account for roughly 45% of Brazil’s bovine genetics market.

“We anticipate double-digit growth over the next two to three years, capitalizing on the upward cycle in cattle breeding,” said Sergio Saud, Genex’s sales leader.

To support the arrival of additional brands, the group will invest R$10 million in a new distribution center in Uberaba (MG). Among the new additions to the Brazilian market will be Genetics Australia—acquired by the group last year—which specializes in tropical livestock.

Other brands in the portfolio include PEAK, a global leader in bull production for genetics centers; SCCL, which converts bovine colostrum into biological products for calf health; and Jetstream Genetics, known for premium Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle.

“Expanding our portfolio will become a much stronger reality from now on, and that’s exactly why we’ll need a more robust structure,” said Mr. Carvalho.

*By Cleyton Vilarino — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Proxy season will see 453 board members elected by end of April, according to Ânima; only 22.5% of candidates are women

04/17/2025


Brazilian publicly listed companies will elect 453 board members by the end of this month for the 2025 proxy season, amid a backdrop of rising debt costs due to higher interest rates, shareholder disputes, and minority investors pushing to gain representation.

According to a survey commissioned by Valor to consulting firm Ânima, 55 out of the 84 companies that comprise the Ibovespa, B3’s main index, will appoint board members this year. In 2024, a total of 360 board members were elected.

The survey shows that just 22.5% of candidates are women, and nearly half of the 453 individuals will be independent directors. “In addition to changes in board composition, the meetings will address crucial items such as financial statement approvals and bylaw amendments. The presence of minority shareholders, even with small stakes, contributes to a more transparent and balanced environment,” said Simone Monteiro, a partner at Ânima. Knowing who the candidates are “helps assess whether management’s interests are aligned with those of shareholders,” she said.

Eletrobras—despite being privatized—will also reformulate its board at the end of the month, with three nominees from the federal government: Maurício Tolmasquim, Silas Rondeau, and Nelson Hubner. The government and the company recently reached a governance agreement granting the state three board seats, pending shareholder approval. Even without the agreement, the government’s shareholding is sufficient to guarantee two seats.

At Eletrobras, the board election has become contentious, with the company backing a recommended list that includes the government nominees and Carlos Ferreira, a seasoned executive in the energy sector. Competing for seats outside the recommended slate are Marcelo Gasparino—an incumbent board member who was not re-nominated—and José João Abdalla Filho, one of the company’s largest individual shareholders.

Another high-profile case this season involves pharmaceutical firm Hypera, which is overhauling its board after a hostile takeover bid last year by EMS owner Carlos Sanchez—ultimately rejected by the company. Hypera’s founder, João Alves Queiroz Filho (better known as Junior), is seeking to return to the board. Mr. Sanchez, meanwhile, attempted to nominate directors and allied with L Par, controlled by businessman Lirio Parisotto, to propose candidates. Mr. Parisotto withdrew from the process yesterday.

Hypera has resisted its rival’s moves, even appealing to Brazil’s antitrust agency, CADE, to block EMS from gaining influence—indirectly or otherwise—on its board. The regulator requested further information and emphasized that EMS cannot exercise voting rights until a final decision is reached.

At supermarket chain Grupo Pão de Açúcar (GPA), French group Casino, businessman Ronaldo Iabrudi, and investor Nelson Tanure reached a deal on board composition shortly after a shareholder reshuffle. A source close to GPA said the agreement came after pressure from Mr. Tanure, who is reportedly aiming to merge GPA with DIA, a rival supermarket chain undergoing bankruptcy proceedings in which he invested last year. He is now GPA’s second-largest individual shareholder, ahead of Mr. Iabrudi, a former CEO. Other shareholders—including Rafael Ferri and the Coelho Diniz family—have also nominated board candidates.

In the midst of an out-of-court debt restructuring process at Casas Bahia, Michel Klein, a member of the company’s founding family, called a shareholders’ meeting in late March to replace board members and announce his own candidacy. He later withdrew the request, citing a “vote of confidence.”

At Eneva, where BTG Pactual is the main shareholder, André Esteves—founder of the investment bank—will take a seat on the board. Eneva is one of BTG’s energy investments. At B3, Antonio Quintella, chair of the exchange’s board, is stepping down after a decade. José Berenguer, CEO of XP, is rejoining the board.

Ms. Monteiro from Ânima says board changes can stem from a variety of factors, including corporate strategy, governance, and shareholder interests. She notes that in companies with state involvement—direct or indirect—board changes often follow political transitions. “Given the board’s central role in setting strategy and appointing senior management, it’s natural to see turnover in these cases,” she said.

Ownership changes and new investors also tend to spark board shakeups. Other common reasons for board turnover include shareholder pressure, M&A activity, strategic restructuring, governance issues, or even management crises, the consultant adds.

Despite the large number of seats up for election, this does not necessarily imply significant turnover across all companies, as many incumbents are likely to be reappointed. However, certain cases stand out due to their broader context. Generally, more dramatic changes occur in financially distressed companies, those with active minority shareholders vying for influence, and companies receiving board nominations from government-affiliated institutions like the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) and Previ, the pension fund for Banco do Brasil employees.

“The controversy often revolves around high-profile nominations, such as former ministers. What’s rarely questioned are family-backed nominees with little to no qualifications who are appointed solely based on their relationships,” said corporate governance expert Renato Chaves. He added that board elections usually draw the most attention from the market, though greater scrutiny should be placed on executive compensation. “Unfortunately, excessive compensation at some companies is rarely discussed,” he said.

Luiz Martha, director of knowledge at the Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance (IBGC), stressed that shareholder meetings are among the most important events for a public company and should not be treated as mere formalities. “It should be a moment of engagement with shareholders,” he said. The board election, he added, is especially critical for shareholders, as their chosen representative becomes their voice inside the company.

When contacted, Eneva stated via its press office that board turnover is part of a process agreed upon by shareholders in 2024. “Eneva believes the new board composition will accelerate strategic decision-making, support healthy governance rotation, and reinforce shareholders’ commitment to expanding the company’s energy platform,” the statement read.

Eletrobras, B3, Casas Bahia, GPA, and Hypera declined to comment.

*By Fernanda Guimarães — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Brazil’s top biodiesel producer expands with new plants and investment in SAF, ethanol, and low-carbon fuel

04/15/2025


Be8 ended 2024 with a net profit of R$477 million—nearly 30 times higher than the previous year—and a recovery in sales.

The company has been aggressively expanding its operations in biodiesel, where it is Brazil’s largest producer, while also diversifying its portfolio with investments in sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), advanced biodiesel, and ethanol.

Net revenue from sales reached R$7.3 billion, a slight increase of 1.4% compared to 2023, though still below the record R$9.6 billion posted in 2022. Adjusted EBITDA doubled to R$599 million.

Last year, Be8 produced more than 900 million liters of biodiesel at its plants in Marialva (Paraná) and Passo Fundo (Rio Grande do Sul), and finalized the purchase of three additional biodiesel plants in the states of Mato Grosso, Piauí, and Pará. The deal was approved by Brazil’s antitrust agency CADE in January 2025.

The company is also advancing three greenfield projects. One is the construction of a free trade zone in Paraguay, where a SAF and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) plant will be built—a project first announced in 2019. The second is an ethanol and wheat gluten facility currently under construction in Passo Fundo. The third is a new plant for producing BeVant, its proprietary low-carbon biodiesel, located next to its existing facility in the same city.

To support these investments, Be8 issued R$200 million in Agribusiness Receivables Certificates (CRA) last year. According to its financial statements, the company’s net debt rose 18.7% to R$541 million, while net cash fell R$544 million, closing the year at R$493 million.

*By Camila Souza Ramos, Globo Rural — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Recent law ended exemption for international e-commerce under $50; all imports now subject to tax, with few exceptions

04/15/2025

Consumers who purchase products from international websites or bring goods from overseas travel are subject to paying Brazil’s Import Tax, a federal levy overseen by the Federal Revenue Service.

One of the agency’s stated goals is to protect the domestic market. In one of its tax education guides, the Federal Revenue Service noted that “by collecting import and export taxes, as other countries do, Customs protects the national industry, preserving jobs and our economy.”

How does the import tax work?

Any individual or business that brings or imports foreign goods for personal use or resale must pay fees associated with what’s known as “customs clearance”—the process of inspection and legalization of goods upon arrival in Brazil.

According to tax attorney Renata Bilhim, of law firm Toledo Advogados e Associados, both individuals and businesses are required to pay the Import Tax and the state-level Goods and Services Circulation Tax (ICMS), whose rates vary by state, during the clearance process.

The Import Tax rate ranges from 20% to 60% of the product’s final price.

In the case of businesses, other federal charges also apply, including:

  • PIS (Social Integration Program);
  • Cofins (Contribution for the Financing of Social Security);
  • AFRMM (Additional Freight Charge for the Renewal of the Merchant Marine), a levy on ocean freight and import operations.

Ms. Bilhim noted that travelers arriving by air or sea who bring personal-use goods or items within the $1,000 exemption limit are not required to pay taxes. The exemption for land border crossings is $500.

Travelers selected for inspection by the Federal Revenue Service with goods exceeding the exemption limits must either:

  • a) pay a 50% tax on the total value of the excess goods upon arrival;
  • b) or have the goods seized for later auction or donation.

Exemptions

The Federal Revenue Service lists several categories of items exempt from import taxes. These include:

  • Medicines imported by individuals for personal use, up to $10,000, for human treatment (cosmetics, supplements, and veterinary drugs do not qualify);
  • Commercially valueless samples, such as single shoes or miniatures;
  • Books, newspapers, and magazines;
  • Brazilian phonograms and videograms;
  • Goods replaced under warranty due to flaws;
  • Imports by diplomatic missions, consular offices, or international organizations.

Until August 2024, international online purchases up to $50 were exempt from taxes. However, Federal Law No. 14902/2024 removed this exemption—now, all foreign purchases are subject to tax, regardless of value.

Importing companies or their legal representatives must file the Single Import Declaration (DUIMP)—which replaces the former Simplified Import Declaration (DSI) and Import Declaration (DI).

This unified electronic document must be submitted via the Siscomex Website, the federal government’s platform that consolidates customs, tax, and commercial information from both importers and exporters.

The measure is part of Brazil’s New Import Process (NPI), a federal initiative aimed at streamlining and reducing the bureaucracy involved in bringing goods into the country.

*By Priscilla The — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Abrupt shift to 36 hours seen as risk to wages, jobs, and national output

04/11/2025


A sudden reduction of Brazil’s average workweek to 36 hours—the central proposal in a constitutional amendment backed by Congresswoman Erika Hilton to eliminate the 6-days-on, 1-day-off work schedule—could shrink the country’s value added to the economy and its GDP by 3.8% to 6.9%, depending on employers’ responses. The estimate comes from economist Fernando de Holanda Barbosa Filho, a researcher at the Brazilian Institute of Economics at Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV Ibre).

In 2024, Brazil’s value added rose 3.1%, according to the Regis Bonelli Productivity Observatory, based on national accounts data from the statistics agency IBGE. Unlike GDP, value added excludes taxes and subsidies but remains a key measure of economic output.

Mr. Barbosa Filho noted that Brazil’s average weekly work hours are already well below the legal limit of 44 hours, standing at 38.4 in 2024. If this average were cut to 36 hours—with all other factors constant—he estimates a 6.2% drop in total hours worked and, consequently, a proportional 6.2% decline in value added.

“This assumes workers would be just as productive per hour as before, but would simply work fewer hours,” he said.

A broader analysis, however, includes not just employment and hours worked (i.e., labor productivity) but also the capital stock in use, thus accounting for the total productivity (TFP). Under this lens, the economist estimates a 3.8% decline in value added in 2024 if the measure were adopted. The productivity data used also come from the Regis Bonelli Observatory.

“The impact is obviously smaller because only labor, not capital, would be affected,” Mr. Barbosa Filho said. “Claiming GDP would fall by 6% seems far-fetched. But a decline between 2% and 3% is a real risk if such a change is made overnight. Although the proposal is moving through Congress, I think the government would weigh the electoral risk and decide this isn’t the time to introduce additional economic uncertainty.”

Mr. Barbosa Filho added that the measure could reduce per capita income and wages, lead to business closures, and result in job losses. “These are averages—some people work more, others less. Lowering the limit would pull some people down, and they’re usually the ones who will struggle most to adapt.”

His scenarios assume no immediate impact on total employment despite the real wage increase implied by a reduced workweek, which raises unit labor costs. For firms already using the national average of 38.4 hours, the 36-hour cap would increase real wages by roughly 6%. For companies operating at the current legal maximum of 44 hours, the hike would be about 18%.

That, in turn, could prompt layoffs, Mr. Barbosa Filho warned. In such cases, accounting for both labor and capital inputs, the loss to the value added could range from 4.1% to 6.9%, depending on the wage increase and employers’ responses. “It’s important to stress these are simplified partial-equilibrium exercises. In a general-equilibrium scenario, all prices in the economy would shift,” he noted.

One common argument in favor of shorter workweeks is that productivity will rise. However, labor productivity in Brazil has shown what Mr. Barbosa Filho called “mediocre” growth in recent decades.

Between 1981 and 2024, total factor productivity grew by only 0.2% annually. Since 2018, it has declined by 0.4% per year. Even under optimistic productivity assumptions, the proposed reduction would still weigh on economic output. A 2.5% TFP increase would still translate into a 1.4% fall in value added. With just 0.5% TFP growth, the decline would be 3.3%—comparable to Brazil’s 2015–2016 recession.

Since 1981, Brazil’s average workweek has gradually shrunk by 0.3% per year, he noted. “This reflects technological change, but also rising incomes. As people earn more, they tend to work fewer hours. If you compare rich and poor countries, the average workweek is usually shorter in wealthier nations,” he said.

Between 1988 and 1989, Brazil’s average workweek fell from 42.8 to 41.8 hours, a 2.2% drop that Barbosa Filho attributes largely to the 1988 Constitution, which reduced the legal cap from 48 to 44 hours. “Part of the 1980s economic crisis stemmed from that change. And later, we saw productivity fall—not because workers got ‘worse,’ but because they were working fewer hours,” he explained.

He added that current legislation already guarantees at least one day off per week and does not prevent companies from adopting alternative work arrangements. “Many companies already use different schedules from the 6 x 1 model,” he said. “The demand for shorter workweeks has been unfolding gradually, and sectors are adjusting. We’ll get there in time.”

*By Anaïs Fernandes — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/