04/30/2025


Brazilian investors who braved higher-risk assets since January—despite sky-high interest rates—now have reason to celebrate. The fallout from U.S. President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff plan, which introduced fresh uncertainty to global markets, ended up easing pressure on Brazil’s real and nominal future interest rates, equities, and the local currency.

As of April 29, the benchmark Ibovespa stock index had risen 3.7% for the month and 12.3% year-to-date. Small-cap stocks were up 8.3% in April and 18% since January. Real estate stocks soared 10% in the month and 29.3% on the year, while consumer-linked stocks jumped 12.4% and 21.5%, respectively—leading gains in the equity market. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 was down 0.9% in April and had lost 5.5% since the beginning of the year.

In fixed income, the IRF-M index, which tracks a basket of fixed-rate government bonds and is calculated by the Brazilian Financial and Capital Markets Association (ANBIMA), delivered the strongest performance, with gains of 2.7% in April and 7.5% for the year. The IMA-B 5 index, which tracks bonds maturing within five years and linked to the IPCA consumer price index, was up 1.7% and 4.9% over the same periods. The real strengthened, with the exchange rate per U.S. dollar falling 1.3% in April and 8.9% year-to-date. Gold, a traditional hedge during crises or inflationary periods, rose 4.6% in April and 15.9% for the year

Is ‘Brazil trade’ back?

“No one expected the month to end the way it did,” said Sigrid Guimarães, founding partner at Alocc Gestão de Patrimônio. “On ‘Liberation Day’—when Trump laid out his tariff plan—the U.S. market turned extremely volatile, flirting with circuit breakers and chaos. Yet it ended with the S&P 500 down 1%, while the Brazilian stock exchange rose, the dollar fell, and interest rates dropped. What we saw is that Brazil is well-positioned for this scenario.”

Since Alocc’s clients hold significant equity exposure via a fund of actively managed portfolios, the asset manager had a close view of the gains. “Some asset managers posted real returns of 10% to 13%. That’s what April was about.”

With the rise in companies listed on the Ibovespa, the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio—used to gauge return expectations—is now at 9 times earnings, up from 7 before the rally. “These are solid real assets, but people still don’t believe in Brazilian stocks. When we analyze the companies, we think, ‘this can’t be real.’ If valuations return to the average, there’s room for further gains, and those well positioned will benefit.”

Previously, the rebound was limited to the index, but now more sectors are performing well and managers are nearly fully invested, Guimarães said. “Prices are extremely attractive. If investors know how to identify the good ones, they can benefit greatly when the market improves.”

Fabio Zaclis, head of macro multi-strategy at Daycoval Asset Management, said part of the Brazilian stock market’s rally stems from a reallocation of global resources, given that local valuations remain heavily discounted compared to peers. “Brazil always draws attention from foreign investors because of valuation, but this is not yet a standalone Brazil story. It’s not tied to the interest rate cycle, and there’s no retail investor inflow either,” he said. “It’s more of a global story than a local one.”

In an environment of high interest rates and no fiscal reform, fundamentals haven’t improved, Mr. Zaclis noted. Capital that had been sitting idle in the U.S. is now flowing toward other major currencies like the euro, Swiss franc, yen, and key emerging markets—including Brazil.

After a stressful start to the year for Brazilian assets, with future interest rates spiking and the exchange rate per dollar breaking past R$6, Mr.Zaclis believes the current rally is more a result of global dynamics than domestic developments.

Shift in perception

What has changed since the end of last year is the perception of Brazil’s Central Bank following Gabriel Galípolo’s appointment to succeed Roberto Campos Neto as its head. “We saw a Selic [policy] rate hike coupled with clear communication about inflation expectations and the need to raise rates to hit the inflation target,” Mr. Zaclis said. “That explains part of the [price] relief and a risk-on move.” The key question now, he said, is whether this momentum is sustainable.

Mr. Zaclis also pointed out that real interest rates offered particularly high premiums, especially in strategies involving breakeven inflation—comparing fixed-rate bonds with those tied to the IPCA. “We saw local interest rate curves offering historically high premiums, rarely seen when compared to the Central Bank’s targets or the Focus survey,” he said, referring to the Central Bank’s market expectations report.

With upcoming fiscal and quasi-fiscal stimulus on the radar—via state-owned bank credit or new formats like private payroll-deductible loans—he expects the Central Bank to keep raising rates until inflation aligns with the target. Any reversal would require changes in current inflation levels. Projections for 12 months ahead still show the IPCA hovering between 5.5% and 5.7%, far from the 3% target.

Mr. Trump’s tariff policy may have an external effect, shaking global markets and helping to anchor expectations in a world facing weaker growth, Mr. Zaclis added. Commodity prices could support this adjustment.

Carlos André, president of ANBIMA, said it remains unclear how Mr. Trump’s measures are affecting global markets and domestic asset prices. “The key point is rising uncertainty. That leads to volatility. Without a clear outlook, it becomes very hard to make investment decisions or price assets reliably. The word of the moment is uncertainty.” In such times, investors turn to traditional fixed income, but he sees this as a “circumstantial” move.

Bruno Funchal, CEO of Bradesco Asset Management, voiced cautious optimism regarding monetary policy. “The difficulties created by the tariff war and its impact on global growth could accelerate our own interest rate cut cycle.”

For those who diversified abroad, April brought above-average volatility—but that doesn’t mean allocating more of a portfolio overseas is a bad idea, said Caio Fasanella, head of investments at Nomad, a financial services platform.

Global diversification

“With the sharp depreciation of the real in recent years, Brazilians have lost global purchasing power and wealth, and this long-term trend will persist because of fiscal challenges and structurally higher inflation compared to the U.S.,” Mr. Fasanella said. “Those who built globalized portfolios in the past are now reaping the rewards of diversification.”

He acknowledged, however, that investors who entered foreign markets more recently have felt the brunt of volatility since early April, when President Trump unveiled his import tariff plan. “It’s a natural correction in a longer-term bull cycle,” Mr. Fasanella said.

Three weeks after the announcement, he said there’s still no clear alternative to U.S. assets or the dollar. “It remains the safe haven—where investors run to, turbulence or not—be it the currency or Treasury bonds.”

Brazil, meanwhile, is in a markedly different place, with inflation rising for longer and currency pressure easing after the exchange rate per U.S. dollar peaked at R$6.2 at the end of 2024. “The real interest rate remains extremely high, at levels we haven’t seen in a decade—since the impeachment of [former president] Dilma Rousseff,” Mr. Fasanella said. “For Brazilian investors, there’s now a clearer path to fixed-income investments with low risk, whether in floating-rate bonds or IPCA-linked securities, given lower inflation.”

Still, he’s cautious about fixed-rate bonds, even though yields are near their highs. With fiscal policy uncertainty and the 2026 election looming, public spending could add pressure on inflation. “This is a segment that could suffer more,” he warned. As for equities, he believes a catalyst is needed for more consistent gains.

*By Adriana Cotias — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

04/30/2025


 — Foto: Pixabay
— Photo: Pixabay

Brazil grew close to 3% or more in the last four years, a considerable pace, but one the country is unable to sustain. Fiscal woes and nearly stagnated productivity, decades-long problems in the country, are holding back the economy from sustaining stronger growth.

“The government is by far the biggest debtor, generating a demand that pressures interest rates and creates a vicious cycle which needs to be stopped,” sums up former Central Bank president Armínio Fraga, currently a principal at Gávea Investimentos. “We are unable to create an efficient state, with resource allocations that justify to society the tax burden’s size,” says former Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) president Elena Landau.

In order to improve the fiscal side, analysts underscore the importance of enacting measures to control spending, which include decoupling pensions and welfare benefits from the minimum wage, as well as enacting a new pension reform.

A productivity that grows too slowly, except with agribusiness, represents another problem. Between 1995 and 2024, labor efficiency gains rose on average just 0.8% a year, according to FGV Ibre researcher Fernando Veloso. Given the weak efficiency gains, the economy is unable to grow faster without creating inflationary pressure.

Fiscal uncertainties and low productivity are some of the topics discussed in this edition of Valor Econômico, which celebrates its 25-year anniversary with a 96-page special section. Among other challenges discussed are education problems, energy transition, and corporate efforts.

“Since early on, the paper set itself out to exercise a prominent role for national development,” says Grupo Globo CEO João Roberto Marinho. “Valor helps promote the debate needed for enhancing public policy and contributes to improving Brazil’s business environment,” he adds. “We don’t have interests, we have values. And such credibility, built among so many temptations, is the pillar of everything,” says Frederic Kachar, generatl director of Editora Globo and Sistema Globo de Rádio.

By Valor — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

 

 

04/29/2025


The United Arab Emirates hopes to finalize a trade agreement with Mercosur later this year, UAE Minister of State for International Cooperation Reem Al Hashimy said on Monday (28).

While in Rio de Janeiro for the inaugural BRICS foreign ministers’ meeting with the UAE as a permanent member, she commended the growing partnership with Brazil and emphasized the opportunities for additional investment.

The minister said she believes in the vision of President Lula and cited examples of joint projects in other countries to show that the relationship is neither occasional nor limited to bilateral ties.

“We firmly believe that not only is the potential [of the partnership] very high, but we also believe in Lula, in his vision, and in his support for institutions,” she said during a conversation with journalists on the sidelines of the BRICS meeting.

UAE Vice Minister Saeed Al Hajeri emphasized that Brazil could serve as the gateway for UAE operations in Latin America and highlighted the investments made by UAE companies and sovereign wealth funds in Brazil. “Brazil could be the gateway to Latin America for the United Arab Emirates. We have a history of joint investments,” he said.

One example cited was Mubadala, Abu Dhabi’s sovereign fund, which is “very well positioned in different sectors of the Brazilian economy,” according to Mr. Al Hajeri. Mubadala has investments in concessions such as the Rio de Janeiro Metro; in financial assets such as Americas Trading Group (ATG), which is leading the project for a new stock exchange in Rio; and in education, with investments in medical training courses.

Sectors such as food security, renewable energy, infrastructure and logistics, technology, and artificial intelligence were cited by UAE representatives as areas of interest for new investments in Brazil.

In 2023, bilateral trade—excluding oil—exceeded $4 billion. For Mr. Al Hajeri, this is “only the beginning.” “Our goal is to significantly expand trade volumes, investment flows, and sectoral collaboration,” he said.

In an era of uncertainty, Ms. Al Hashimy said international cooperation is the way to face challenges. Currently, the UAE has 27 trade agreements and is negotiating others.

“We are in the final stage of negotiations with Mercosur. We are keen to conclude the deal soon, and I believe it will happen this year,” the minister said, revealing that conversations have also begun with Mexico and the European Union.

The UAE minister stressed that BRICS should be a bloc “for cooperation, not confrontation,” aligning with the view expressed by Brazilian Foreign Affairs Minister Mauro Vieira during the opening of the meeting in Rio.

In Ms. Al Hashimy’s view, BRICS is a “vital platform for economic collaboration” and enables an “open-door policy,” creating a safe environment for companies and nations to collaborate and access new markets.

“[BRICS] also fosters an open-door policy, encouraging open and dynamic global connections and providing a stable environment in which companies and nations can collaborate, access new markets, and thrive,” she added.

*By Lucianne Carneiro — Rio de Janeiro

Source: Valor International

 

 

 

 

04/29/2025


Brazil’s mining industry remains optimistic about the market outlook. The expectation is that Chinese demand for iron ore will remain resilient and that the sector can increasingly play a prominent role in the global economy, especially with the rise of critical and strategic minerals essential for the energy transition. Investments projected between 2025 and 2029 total $68.4 billion, up 6.6% from the previous period (2024–2028), according to the Brazilian Mining Institute (IBRAM).

IBRAM’s projections still account for certain challenges facing the sector, including uncertainties from the U.S.–China trade war and the 25% tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on Brazilian aluminum and steel. Iron ore is a key input in steel production. Another concern is the volatility in mineral prices. In 2024, iron ore prices declined from $135 per tonne in January to $105 in December.

“Iron ore prices this year are expected to remain in the $95 to $105 per tonne range,” said Julio Nery, IBRAM’s director of mining affairs. Despite last year’s drop in international prices, mining industry revenues were not negatively affected. IBRAM’s report shows that revenue grew 9.1% in 2024, reaching R$270.8 billion, with iron ore accounting for 59% of the total. The increase was driven by the stronger exchange rate and robust mineral sales, with iron ore revenues rising 8.6% year over year.

Of the total investments projected over the next four years, 28.7%—or $19.59 billion— will be made by iron ore mining companies. That figure is 13.4% higher than the investment forecast for the 2024–2028 period. According to IBRAM, the U.S.–China trade war has not yet disrupted the sector’s investment timeline, but it has raised red flags.

In the case of iron ore, Brazil has long relied on Chinese demand. Even during periods of economic slowdown, Beijing has consistently imported large volumes of Brazilian ore, despite competition from geographically closer producers like Australia—a major supplier whose ore is considered to have lower purity levels than Brazil’s. “Brazilian iron commands a $5 to $10 premium for its quality. Higher-grade ore consumes less energy in processing and produces less slag [a byproduct used in cement],” said Mr. Nery.

In 2024, Brazil exported 389 million tonnes of iron ore and its products, with nearly two-thirds bound for China. These shipments generated $29.85 billion in revenue, placing the sector behind only crude oil ($44.84 billion) and soybeans ($42.9 billion) in export earnings.

The U.S. imported $4.677 billion in Brazilian iron and steel products, accounting for 14.9% of its total imports in those segments—second only to Canada (24.2%). However, unlike exports to China, which are mostly of beneficiated raw ore (processed through crushing, grinding, and magnetic separation), Brazil exports very little raw ore to the U.S., according to Mr. Nery. “The tariff hikes affect steelmakers, not miners,” he said.

Due to the large-scale steel processing infrastructure in the U.S., Brazilian iron is mostly exported in the form of semi-finished steel and pig iron—a processed product free of slag. Pig iron is made in blast furnaces using coke or charcoal and limestone, and serves as an intermediate product for steelmaking in U.S. plants.

According to Lucas Laghi, head of mining and steel at XP, the main exporters of pig iron are ArcelorMittal and Argentina’s Ternium, both of which are privately held. “In the case of CSN, Usiminas, and Gerdau—all publicly traded—exports to the U.S. are limited,” said Mr. Laghi, who does not expect any “sharp turns” in announced investments. “When it comes to iron, the sector is closely tied to China, and there’s no sign of significant shifts in steel demand. We might see more volatility in metals like nickel and copper, which are more exposed to fluctuations in global growth,” he added.

*By Guilherme Meirelles — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

04/29/2025


Brazilian companies will have to pay an additional R$126 billion in interest by 2030, following the rise in rates that began in 2024. The estimate comes from a study by A&M (Alvarez & Marsal) Performance, which analyzed 3,780 debt securities indexed to the Interbank Deposit (DI) rate across a total of 1,130 companies. In 2025 alone, companies are expected to pay an extra R$26 billion in interest.

Besides diverting funds that could contribute to the companies’ growth, the amount allocated to interest payments highlights the scale of the challenge the private sector faces with higher financial costs, said Guilherme Almeida, managing director at the consulting firm.

With the recent rate increases, about half of the listed companies are expected to generate insufficient cash flow to cover interest payments, the study found. Furthermore, the consultancy calculated that 62% of companies will likely face difficulties refinancing their debts under the same capital structure, considering the increase in the Selic policy rate—which could worsen further.

“We are perhaps facing one of the worst moments of the past four years. There are signs the situation is deteriorating,” Mr. Almeida said. “Companies endured a pandemic, then a first wave of interest rate hikes. Even after taking various corrective actions, companies remain on average weakened. With this new round of rate increases, there’s a pressing need to extend debt maturities, generate cash, and meet obligations.”

To assess companies’ ability to pay interest, A&M analyzed the latest available data from 237 publicly traded companies listed on B3, comparing free cash flow—EBITDA minus capital expenditures—with interest expenses over the past 12 months.

Debt refinancing challenges

The findings showed that 40% of the companies already had interest expenses greater than their cash generation. Now, considering the current Selic rate level, that proportion could reach 50% of companies, MR. Almeida said. In March of this year, Brazil’s benchmark interest rate rose by another 100 basis points to 14.25%, an increase of 350 bp compared to the 2024 average rate of 10.7%. Although the Central Bank has indicated that future hikes may be smaller, the tightening cycle is not yet over.

“The most concerning part is that this calculation pertains to listed companies, which are theoretically the healthiest in Brazil. If we look at smaller firms, the situation either replicates or worsens.”

The study also analyzed another indicator—the companies’ interest coverage ratio, essentially the ratio between cash generation and interest expenses. It found that six out of ten companies had a ratio below 1.5 times, a level generally seen as the minimum comfortable threshold in the market. “A ratio below 1.5 typically signals that the debt is unhealthy and that the company could struggle to refinance under the same capital structure,” Mr. Almeida said.

Industrials, materials, technology, and telecommunications showed the worst results. The consumer sector also had a low index, but it is now recovering after the crisis of recent years, he noted.

While the study did not name specific companies, an analysis of publicly available financial statements shows that groups across different sectors are struggling to reduce leverage.

One publicly listed company facing financial distress is Braskem, which is dealing with several issues, including the geological disaster in Alagoas and the downturn in the petrochemical market. The company ended 2024 with a financial leverage ratio of 7.42 times net debt to recurring EBITDA, excluding extraordinary expenses like compensation related to the Alagoas incident. Including payments linked to the disaster, the group’s cash generation was negative by R$542 million last year.

Asset sale strategies

Cosan is another company showing a high level of financial commitments relative to its free cash flow. The energy and infrastructure group is working to reduce its leverage, which has included selling its stake in Vale and could involve further divestments—the company has already said it may dilute its stake in Raízen and sell other assets, such as the São Luís Port in Maranhão.

Asset sales have become a common strategy for several groups. CSN (Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional), which aims to reduce its leverage from 3.49 times at the end of 2024 to below 3 times by the end of 2025, is one of them.

Late last year, CSN approved the sale of an 11% stake in CSN Mineração to Japan’s Itochu, and other similar moves are under study. These include seeking a partner for an infrastructure platform that would combine its railroad and port assets, as well as selling part of its energy division. According to sources close to the conglomerate, its cement division has also attracted interest, but that deal is not currently being pursued. Despite the deleveraging plan, the person said the group has enough cash to meet all its short- and medium-term financial obligations.

GPA (Grupo Pão de Açúcar) has also adopted asset sales to reduce its debt. Over the past two years, the retailer raised R$1.9 billion through asset sales. Other measures were also taken, including a secondary stock offering, staff cuts, and cost reviews.

A person close to the company said there is still room to sell land and stakes in non-core businesses, which could further boost cash flow. In addition, the retailer is considering another reduction in headcount and expects an improvement in business cash generation, relying on the resilience of its high-end customer base. “The scenario of the past 12 months does not reflect projections for the next 12,” the source said.

Leverage reduction plans

Another company working to improve its indicators is Klabin, which has just concluded its largest investment cycle and is now focusing on reducing its leverage, which ended 2024 at 3.9 times. The pulp producer made it clear there will be no discussions about new investments in the short term, with the focus firmly on deleveraging.

However, Gabriela Woge, corporate finance director at Klabin, said there is no risk of debt default. “We have more than enough cash to meet our commitments, along with a stretched debt profile,” she said. Between cash reserves and revolving credit lines, the company has R$10 billion available to meet payments.

She also said that the last two funding rounds completed by the company, in April, came at a lower cost than the current average debt rate. In addition, Klabin signed an agreement in 2024 to sell surplus land, which has already brought in R$800 million, with further payments expected to strengthen the company’s cash position this year.

Braskem, Cosan, CSN, and GPA declined to comment.

Despite sector-by-sector differences, analysts agree that the overall situation is very challenging. For Bernardo Parnes, founding partner of Investment One Partners, the outlook is even more complex because 2026 is an election year, which tends to bring additional instability to the capital markets. Given this perspective, he believes that even with high rates, some companies should seek to secure financing in advance.

“This is the time to tighten the screws, optimize operations, identify where profitability is leaking, and streamline processes to try to weather the period without major shocks. The scenario also forces companies to maintain larger cash reserves, which is even more costly,” Mr. Parnes said.

Mr. Almeida of A&M also noted that companies will need to focus even more on costs and internal processes to manage higher interest rates. “In this scenario, companies generally have a few options: they can begin financing themselves with more expensive debt, which is not ideal, or they can look inward. Our main hypothesis is that companies will need to reassess profitability and cut costs to navigate this period.”

Restructuring activity

Advisors specializing in restructurings and bankruptcy proceedings are already seeing increased activity. “The number of companies reaching out to us has grown significantly. The situation is even tougher for medium- and small-sized companies,” said Thomas Felsberg of Felsberg Advogados.

According to him, the complex external environment offers one advantage: creditors have a better understanding that the crisis is not solely the result of poor management. “On the other hand, the higher cost of financing complicates solutions, because restructuring usually requires some new capital injection and the presentation of guarantees,” he said.

The situation is even harder because many companies are still recovering from a series of crises over recent years, said Gustavo Salgueiro, partner at Galdino, Pimenta, Takemi, Ayoub, Salgueiro, Rezende de Almeida Advogados. “Some companies are still suffering financially from the pandemic. At that time, many banks eased terms and extended debt maturities, often requiring additional guarantees. In some cases, interest was accrued, the debt grew, operations did not rebound as expected, and companies lost access to receivables pledged as collateral. Now, with higher rates, servicing the debt has become unsustainable,” said Mr. Salgueiro, who also reported an increase in companies seeking assistance.

*By Taís Hirata  — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

 

04/28/2025


Chinese investors have returned to Brazil’s mergers and acquisitions scene after a few years of cooling interest in the country’s assets. Investment bankers say the focus remains largely on infrastructure—including logistics, energy, and mining—but interest is also emerging in technology, particularly in data infrastructure.

Recent deals involving Chinese buyers include the sale of Vast Infraestrutura, part of Prumo Logística, to China Merchants (CMP). Chinese wind blade manufacturer Sinoma Blade also came close to acquiring Brazilian wind turbine maker Aeris, which is currently navigating a financial crisis.

Late last year, China Nonferrous Metal Mining Co. (CNMC) purchased the tin, niobium, and uranium operations of Peruvian miner Taboca in Amazonas for $340 million. A source noted that a Chinese bidder was also actively involved in the sale of Vale’s energy assets under the Aliança brand.

Specialists believe Chinese investors are now also eyeing Brazil’s data infrastructure, including data centers, driven by the global race to expand capacity amid growing demand fueled by artificial intelligence. Brazil’s availability of land and clean energy has become a key attraction. Critical minerals and renewable energy assets are also expected to be major targets, with a focus on the energy transition.

Bankers say the ongoing trade war between the United States and China could further boost Chinese interest in Brazil.

“Chinese players are involved in the processes,” said Roderick Greenlees, global head of investment banking at Itaú BBA. He added that foreign presence in Brazil’s M&A market has increased this year, and that China’s renewed focus on international markets stems partly from tightened U.S. relations. “Latin America has returned as an alternative,” he said.

The new wave of interest, however, predates the latest tensions. Fabio Mourão, head of corporate clients at BNP Paribas in Brazil, said Chinese interest in traditional sectors like infrastructure has been growing for the past 18 to 24 months, well before the current escalation of U.S.-China trade tensions. “A new front has opened with Chinese investors actively seeking data center opportunities in Brazil,” Mr. Mourão noted.

Trade war impact

Anderson Brito, head of investment banking at UBS BB, recalled that Chinese names were more prevalent in Brazilian M&A between 2009 and 2015, with a decline afterward. Now, he said, there are signs of renewed appetite. Since 2018, when the U.S.-China trade war began, Chinese investment in the U.S. has slowed, pushing investors to explore other regions. “We have several new mandates involving Chinese interest, particularly in mining, infrastructure, and financial services,” he said.

Antonio Coutinho, head of M&A at Citi in Brazil, confirmed greater Chinese participation, especially in mining and infrastructure deals. “It’s not yet a Chinese boom, but there is a moderate uptick in interest,” he said. Mr. Coutinho noted that some newcomers—firms with no previous presence in Brazil—are also entering the market.

The appetite is likely to grow. Túlio Cariello, director of content and research at the Brazil-China Business Council, said that while China focused its investments on the U.S. and Europe in the 2000s, it has shifted toward other markets amid mounting restrictions. He expects that rising tensions with the U.S. will further accelerate this trend. One of Brazil’s main advantages, Mr. Cariello pointed out, is the size of its consumer market. Investments could come through both M&A deals and greenfield projects, he added.

Li Yong Hong, CEO and partner at Yafela Investimento, a Chinese firm specializing in foreign trade and M&A, believes Chinese interest in Brazil will continue to grow, although the first effects will likely be felt in trade before materializing into new investments. He said joint ventures are likely to be a favored route, helping to bridge cultural differences. In Brazil, Yafela has partnered with Volt, and the companies expect to close their first deal soon, said Volt’s founding partner Henrique Faria.

Interest from China has not been limited to asset purchases. Celso Nishihara, director of M&A at Banco Fator, said significant Chinese interest has emerged over the past two years, not only in M&A but also in direct investments. In addition to energy and mining, Chinese investors are also targeting the automotive sector, with Chinese automakers GWM and BYD ramping up local production in Brazil.

*By Fernanda Guimarães — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

04/25/2025


WEG, which makes electric motors and transformers at its plant in Jaraguá do Sul, Santa Catarina, gets 8% of revenue from exports to the U.S. — Foto: Rogerio Vieira/Valor
WEG, which makes electric motors and transformers at its plant in Jaraguá do Sul, Santa Catarina, gets 8% of revenue from exports to the U.S. — Photo: Rogerio Vieira/Valor

More than the proposed 10% additional tariffs on Brazilian imports to the U.S., investment analysts are increasingly concerned about the broader shift in global trade dynamics that could result from an escalating U.S.–China trade war.

There is consensus among analysts at banks and brokerages that Brazilian companies with more globalized operations are better positioned to cushion the impact of any new trade barriers. However, continued uncertainty surrounding U.S. policy—driven by erratic decisions and reversals—makes it difficult to clearly separate potential winners from losers.

Embraer remains somewhat shielded thanks to its “near-monopoly” in the U.S. regional jet market, analysts say.

The case of Iochpe-Maxion, a Brazilian auto parts manufacturer, illustrates the challenges in assessing risks. Earlier this month, J.P. Morgan had identified the company as one of the sector’s most exposed to the proposed tariffs. But that assessment came before news reports suggested that U.S. President Donald Trump was considering exemptions for vehicle and parts imports to allow companies more time to establish local manufacturing operations.

Should such exemptions materialize, there is room for a positive impact if Iochpe avoids direct tariffs, according to UBS BB. The same would apply to Tupy, another listed Brazilian auto parts supplier.

Brazilian firms would be indirectly affected by tariffs imposed on light vehicles exported to the U.S. that contain parts manufactured in Mexico, where both companies operate. Mexico is facing additional tariffs of 25%. In a worst-case scenario, with no exemptions, J.P. Morgan estimates up to a 6% revenue hit for both firms. The bank also reiterated that the potential drop in demand triggered by tariffs poses another layer of risk.

XP analysts echoed that concern, emphasizing how higher prices could dampen volumes or squeeze supply chains by distributing added costs downstream.

The Financial Times recently reported that Trump may exempt Chinese auto parts from tariffs following pressure from industry executives, while maintaining existing tariffs on imports from other countries.

In the pulp and paper sector, XP does not foresee significant changes in volume, given the limited U.S. production of short-fiber pulp, which depends heavily on Brazilian exports. However, analysts at U.S. bank Truist, citing Dow Jones Newswires, warned that the new tariffs could suppress demand from American buyers. While the industry is known for its resilience during downturns, the sweeping tariff hikes could become the tipping point that deepens a broader economic slowdown, weakening demand for paper and packaging.

In Brazil, the impact on Suzano is expected to be minimal, given the company’s relatively low exposure to the U.S. market, XP noted. However, the recent drop in pulp prices in China is likely to weigh on results for exporters, according to Bank of America.

Embraer, with global operations that include factories in Portugal and the U.S., maintains a strong market position in regional jets but is not immune to macroeconomic threats, Citi analysts warn. A recession would likely curb demand for both commercial and executive aircraft, and the company still faces risks tied to higher and more aggressive tariffs.

WEG, often viewed by analysts as one of the companies least exposed to trade disruptions, remains on XP’s watchlist due to the cyclical nature of its commodity-linked product portfolio. About 8% of its revenue comes from exports to the U.S.

“As long as the domestic U.S. outlook remains uncertain, we see room for WEG to expand local production by ramping up capacity at its Marathon facilities, reducing reliance on other regions if needed,” the brokerage noted. WEG acquired Marathon in 2023; the U.S.-based company has operations across several countries.

In the steel sector, Gerdau is seen as a likely beneficiary thanks to its substantial U.S. footprint, although it remains vulnerable to a potential recession. XP estimates that around 50% of Gerdau’s EBITDA comes from its North American operations. “If tariffs are indeed raised to those levels, it’s good news for local producers, including Gerdau’s U.S. unit,” Itaú BBA commented. According to the bank, every 5% increase in Gerdau’s average selling price in the U.S. adds 12% to its EBITDA. The bank also pointed to data from American steelmaker Nucor, which estimated that only 18% of imported steel volumes into the U.S. would be subject to the new 25% tariff. Since Mr. Trump’s election in November last year, shares of Gerdau and other U.S. steelmakers have gained more than 15%, XP noted.

However, multinational companies such as Ternium and ArcelorMittal are expected to be among the hardest hit if the 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports is enacted.

So far, the U.S. president has not announced additional tariffs on steel and aluminum, which have been subject to a 25% duty since the first Trump administration. Still, Brazilian mining giants like Vale and CSN Mineração could be affected if the trade conflict increases uncertainty around Chinese exports, driving down iron ore prices—the core business for both companies.eyond the additional 10% tariffs on Brazilian imports to the United States, investment analysts are more concerned about the new trade conditions likely to arise from a trade war between the U.S. and China.

Experts from banks and brokerages agree that Brazilian companies with more global operations will be better positioned to mitigate the effects of these changes.

However, there’s still a lot of uncertainty about the direction of U.S. policy, with frequent shifts in government decisions, making it more complex for analysts to clearly identify winners and losers.

The case of Iochpe-Maxion exemplifies this difficulty. The automotive parts and components manufacturer was flagged by J.P. Morgan in early April as one of the sector’s companies most affected by the tariffs. However, this analysis was made before the possibility of exemptions for vehicles and parts imported by the U.S. emerged.

According to recent reports, U.S. President Donald Trump might be considering possible exemptions to give companies in the sector more time to establish factories in the U.S.

If this happens, there could be positive impacts if Iochpe remains exempt from direct tariffs, according to UBS BB. This also applies to Tupy, another publicly traded auto parts manufacturer.

Brazilian companies would be indirectly affected by tariffs on light vehicles exported to the U.S. that contain parts manufactured in Mexico, a country where they have operations and which faces additional 25% tariffs. In the worst-case scenario, without an exemption, J.P. Morgan estimated up to a 6% impact on the revenues of both companies. Additionally, the bank reiterates the potential effect of reduced demand caused by the tariffs.

This is the same concern for analysts at XP, who highlight the potential price increases that could negatively influence volumes or pressure the supply chain by distributing additional costs.

The British newspaper “Financial Times” reported that Trump might be planning to exempt auto parts imported from China, following intense pressure from industry executives, without, however, altering the tariffs established for other countries.

In the paper and pulp sector, XP does not anticipate significant changes in volumes due to the low production of short-fiber pulp in the U.S., which relies on Brazilian exports. However, analysts at the American bank Truist believe that tariffs may result in lower demand from American companies, according to Dow Jones Newswires. Although the sector has shown resilience during tough times, the tariff hikes could be the decisive factor leading to a broader recession, with weaker demand for paper and packaging.

In Brazil, the impacts are limited for Suzano, considering its relatively low exposure to the U.S., says XP. The decline in pulp prices traded in China is expected to negatively influence the results of commodity exporters, explains Bank of America.

Embraer, with its global operations, continues to defend its “quasi-monopoly” position in the U.S. regional jet market, according to XP. In addition to Brazil, the company has factories in Portugal and the U.S. However, it is still not shielded from the recession threat, believes Citi: an economic slowdown would reduce the momentum for Embraer’s executive and commercial jet orders, as well as pose risks of higher and more aggressive tariffs.

The case also applies to WEG – identified by analysts as one of those with limited impacts – which still worries XP, considering the cyclical nature of the company’s portfolio, exposed to commodities. Approximately 8% of the company’s revenue comes from exports to the U.S.

“While the domestic scenario in the U.S. remains uncertain, we see room for WEG to expand its local production by accelerating capacity utilization at Marathon facilities, reducing reliance on other regions if this proves beneficial,” says the brokerage. Marathon, acquired by WEG in 2023, has operations in various countries, including the U.S.

In the steel industry, Gerdau is seen as a beneficiary due to its operations in the U.S., but it remains exposed to a recession. About 50% of the company’s EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) comes from its North American division, calculates XP. “If tariffs indeed increase at these levels, it’s positive news for local producers, including [the American operation of] Gerdau,” opines Itaú BBA. For every 5% increase in the average selling price of Gerdau in the U.S., the company’s EBITDA rises by 12%, according to the bank, which refers to data from the American steel company Nucor, which would have only 18% of steel volumes imported to the U.S. subject to the tariff increase to 25%. Since Trump’s election in November last year, Gerdau and U.S. steel companies’ shares have risen by more than 15%, XP notes.

However, multinational companies Ternium and ArcelorMittal are expected to be the most adversely affected by the implementation of 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

It’s worth noting that–for now–the U.S. president has not imposed any additional tariffs on steel and aluminum, which have already faced 25% tariffs on exports to the U.S. since the first Trump administration. However, Vale and CSN Mineração could be impacted as the tariff war heightens risks associated with Chinese exports, which would reduce iron ore prices – the main product of these Brazilian companies.

*By Beatriz Kawai* — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

 

04/25/2025

Taxpayers with an average income ranging from R$750 million to R$1 billion annually pay only 1.49% in income tax on average, according to data from Brazil’s Federal Revenue Service obtained by Valor through the Freedom of Information Act.

The tax authority mapped the income positions of more than 141,000 taxpayers who will be impacted by the government’s proposal to tax high incomes to offset the income tax exemption for individuals earning up to R$5,000 monthly. The plan is to establish a minimum income tax for those earning above R$600,000 annually.

According to the Federal Revenue Service’s data, based on 2022 figures, three taxpayers declared incomes of R$1 billion or more that year, paying an average of 5.54% in income tax. Meanwhile, the seven taxpayers with incomes between R$500 million and R$750 million paid 2.77%. Taxpayers affected by the minimum tax were divided into 25 brackets. Across all brackets, there is a projection of R$25.2 billion in revenue by 2026, matching the estimated tax waiver for the middle class exemption.

Some experts argue that the rates for the wealthiest demonstrate how minimally progressive Brazil’s income tax system is, considering that high earners use tax-exempt instruments.

Others caution that the data should be evaluated carefully, as it does not reflect the taxation that occurs within the companies of which high-income individuals are partners. This is anticipated to be a contentious issue in Congress, in a project reported in the Chamber by former speaker Arthur Lira (Progressive Party, PP, of Alagoas).

According to the Revenue’s calculations, raising the rate to 10% for taxpayers with incomes over R$750 million annually, as proposed, would generate less than R$500 million in revenue per year, given the few billionaires within this income bracket.

The highest annual revenue, according to the Revenue Service, would come from taxpayers earning between R$1.8 million and R$2.4 million annually, the group most affected by the new taxation. For them, the additional tax would generate R$3 billion in revenue.

Additional revenue will also come from a 10% withholding on dividends for those receiving up to R$50,000 per month per company for Brazilian investors, compared to the same withholding for non-residents, regardless of the amount received.

The National Treasury’s main argument in favor of the bill, according to discussions with secretaries who developed the proposal, is to demonstrate that the majority of the contributing population pays income tax at a rate between 7.5% and 27.5%, while the average rate for the 141,000 high-income individuals affected by the proposal is 2.54%.

Members of the department say that because the proposal increases progressivity, the compensatory measure will be fully defended in its presentation to the National Congress. There is room for “marginal adjustments,” according to a source, but without diluting or even replacing the high-income tax.

Unlike other bills drafted by the National Treasury in recent years, the economic team believes there are few arguments for altering the compensatory measure. When contacted through its press office, the department declined to comment.

Moreover, the proposal has popular support. A survey by the Datafolha institute published earlier this month showed that 76% of the population supports the high-income tax as outlined in the project.

“It’s very hard to oppose making a millionaire pay the same as a nurse,” told Valor earlier this month Marcos Pinto, Secretary of Economic Reforms at the National Treasury and one of the proposal’s architects.

To avoid double taxation with dividend taxation, given that the legal entity has already paid income tax, the government devised a calculation that will add the average rate of the individual with that of the legal entity. If this sum is below 34%, the individual must supplement the tax to reach this level. If it exceeds, the withheld dividend will be refunded.

“The data underpinning the proposal reveal the lack of fiscal justice and progressivity in our personal income tax system, and the idea of a minimum tax aligns with the principles of tax justice and contributive capacity,” assessed Lina Santin, a researcher at the FGV’s Fiscal Studies Center.

According to her, despite some necessary improvements, “any project that seeks to attribute greater progressivity to income taxation by focusing on a minimum tax at the top of the pyramid is indeed fulfilling and adhering to these constitutional principles, aiming to reduce inequalities.”

“I think we need to contextualize the numbers a bit because these people have already paid on the corporate side,” countered Adriano Subirá, a Federal Revenue auditor currently working for the Chamber of Deputies.

A point raised by lawmakers is that the minimum income tax to be collected from high-income individuals will be calculated based on what was paid through the company, considering that corporate taxation is 34%. “But that’s not the effective rate paid by companies,” the auditor notes. In practice, they collect something like 22% to 25% in income tax. Thus, the reference should be 25%, he opined.

Another factor to consider, the expert said, is that corporate taxation often falls below 34% due to accounting loss deductions and other adjustments. “These may reduce the effective tax, but it doesn’t mean the person is undertaxed.” This should also be considered, he evaluated.

The bill probably will go through some changes in taxation rates for the wealthiest, but not in the new exemption bracket. Mr. Subirá says the sentiment in Congress is that the bill has support from about 60% of lawmakers. There are those opposed, but they are weighing the political cost of opposing it.

Revenue figures show that the cost of increasing the exemption bracket will be borne by the middle-income brackets between the wealthiest, the auditor observed. Those at the top of the income scale will find legal ways to circumvent the tax increase, such as reducing dividend distributions.

“It’s natural that there’s greater potential for revenue in the bracket between R$1.2 million and R$3.6 million because there are many more people in this income range,” commented economist Sergio Gobetti, a researcher at the Institute for Applied Economic Research (Ipea). “Billionaires or ultramillionaires are a minority and may pay individually high amounts, but collectively they represent little.”

This is one reason why the start of the minimum tax shouldn’t be extended to the R$1.8 million bracket, as proposed by the PP, he commented. “Much less with a rate of only 4%,” he added.

The economist noted that the minimum tax effectively equalizes taxation among high-income individuals, which is currently very variable. Revenue figures show that today rates range from 1.03% to 5.54%, while the minimum tax will raise them to around 9%.

*By Guilherme Pimenta  and Lu Aiko Otta — Brasília

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

 

 

 

04/25/2025

The Extended Consumer Price Index -15 (IPCA-15)–considered a preview of Brazil’s official inflation rate–rose 0.43% in April, following a 0.64% increase in March, the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) reported on Friday (25).

This was the highest rate for the month of April since 2023, when it was 0.57%. In April 2024, the IPCA-15 had increased by 0.21%.

The result exceeded the median of 32 projections from analysts at consulting and financial institutions surveyed by Valor Data, who had estimated a 0.42% increase in April. The range of estimates varied from an increase of 0.37% to 0.54%.

With the April data, the IPCA-15 registered a 5.49% increase over 12 months. As of March, the 12-month result was 5.26%. The cumulative IPCA-15 for 2025, up to April, was 2.43%.

The 12-month result was above the median of the 32 estimates collected by Valor Data, which was 5.48%, with a range between 5.43% and 5.6%. The inflation target set by the Central Bank for 2024 is 3%, with a tolerance of 1.5 percentage points above or below.

Of the nine price categories used to calculate the IPCA-15, five saw an acceleration in increases from March to April. Higher rates were observed in food and beverages (to 1.14% from 1.09%); household goods (to 0.37% from 0.03%); clothing (to 0.76% from 0.28%); health and personal care (to 0.96% from 0.35%); and communication (to 0.52% from 0.32%).

Conversely, there was a slowdown in the rate of increase in housing (to 0.09% from 0.37%); personal expenses (to 0.53% from 0.81%); and education (to 0.06% from 0.07%). Transportation reversed direction (to -0.44% from 0.92%).

The IPCA-15 is a preview of the IPCA, which is calculated based on a typical consumption basket for families with incomes between one and 40 minimum wages. The indicator covers nine metropolitan regions (Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, Belo Horizonte, Recife, São Paulo, Belém, Fortaleza, Salvador, and Curitiba), in addition to the cities of Brasília and Goiânia. The difference from the IPCA lies in the collection period and geographic coverage.

Inflation became more widespread among the items comprising the IPCA-15 in April. The Diffusion Index, which measures the proportion of goods and services that experienced price increases in a given period, rose from 61% in March to 67.8% a month later, according to calculations by Valor Data considering all items in the basket.

Excluding food, one of the more volatile groups, the indicator also rose to 67.8% from 60%.

*By Lucianne Carneiro, Valor — Rio

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

04/22/2025 10:02 AM  Updated um dia

Following the extended holiday weekend, at least four companies are set to conclude debenture offerings totaling R$2.27 billion. Neonergia Pernambuco, Mineração Morro do Ipê, Cirklo, and Autogeração Solar are all finalizing their issuances this week.

Two additional companies—Cielo and Votorantim Cimentos—have ongoing offerings but are expected to wrap them up in May. Cielo is aiming to raise R$3 billion, while Votorantim Cimentos plans to issue R$1 billion.

Among the deals set to close this week, the largest comes from Mineração Morro do Ipê. The mining company, controlled by Mubadala and Trafigura, manages operations in the Serra Azul region, which includes the municipalities of Brumadinho, São Joaquim de Bicas, and Igarapé in Minas Gerais.

The company is seeking R$1.02 billion through seven-year debentures. Part of the issuance will offer returns of CDI (Interbank Deposit Certificate) plus 3.27%, while the remainder will pay CDI plus 2.45%. Settlement is scheduled for April 25.

Neonergia Pernambuco plans to issue R$700 million in tax-exempt debentures, which offer income tax exemption for individual investors. These seven-year bonds will also be settled on April 25, although the final yield has not yet been defined.

On April 24, special-purpose company Autogeração Solar is set to complete a R$330 million offering of 18-year tax-exempt bonds. The proceeds will be used to build a photovoltaic plant.

Cirklo, a company focused on plastic recycling, will launch its first debenture offering in the market, raising R$220 million. The notes are labeled as green bonds. Proceeds will go toward debt refinancing and strengthening the company’s cash position, with a commitment to allocate the same amount to green projects. Settlement is expected on April 22.

*By Rita Azevedo, Valor — São Paulo

Source: Valor International