Posts

The government of President Lula has decided to send Congress a bill to abolish the so-called 6-on-1 workweek, where employees work six consecutive days followed by one day of rest. However, the move has caused division within the ruling coalition, with concerns that it could strain relations with the Speaker of the Lower House, Hugo Motta. Therefore, the government intends to consult Motta prior to officially submitting the proposal.

The draft being discussed would establish two days of weekly rest, a maximum 40-hour workweek, and no reduction in wages. The measure is one of the administration’s main labor initiatives in an election year, though business groups warn it could slow economic activity and cause job losses.

The decision to pursue a bill was made last week, but the timing of its submission has not yet been determined.

Earlier this year, the government considered dropping the proposal after Motta signaled that Congress would proceed with the issue by appointing a rapporteur. However, nearly two months later, officials in the executive branch believe the matter has stalled, citing a lack of significant progress in the Constitution and Justice Committee.

Another concern is the format currently being discussed in Congress—a constitutional amendment. Under this plan, the president would lack veto power. Government officials worry that lawmakers might propose adjustments that broaden exceptions to the original proposal, leaving the executive with little ability to act.

Additionally, constitutional amendments need a three-fifths vote in both houses of Congress, in two rounds of voting—a high threshold that makes the process uncertain.

By contrast, an ordinary bill can be approved with a simple majority in a single vote. If submitted with constitutional urgency, it can also require Congress to act within 45 days by blocking the legislative agenda until it is addressed.

Although officials close to the presidency say the decision to send the bill has effectively been made, government negotiators in the Lower House remain cautious and have avoided confirming the move.

Their assessment is that submitting a bill could be viewed by Motta and party leaders as a provocation, given the speaker’s repeated defense of addressing the issue through a constitutional amendment instead of ordinary legislation.

In a recent meeting, Motta told government officials he planned to act swiftly and pledged to deliver the amendment approved by a special committee as early as May.

According to these officials, the government’s main concern was the pace of discussions and the risk that a slower process could cause the proposal to lose momentum. Motta’s signal of faster progress was therefore well received—reducing the incentive to submit a separate bill that could trigger political friction and complicate negotiations.

By Sofia Aguiar and Beatriz Roscoe — Brasília

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

 

 

 

The prospect of ending the six-day workweek as discussed in Congress could have different impacts on Brazilian companies. The effects could be more negative for labor-intensive sectors, such as commerce and services in general, but also for smaller businesses, which have less capacity to adjust to a reduction in the maximum working hours, said experts who participated in another debate in the Caminhos do Brasil seminar series, in Rio de Janeiro, on Thursday (19). There is also uncertainty about the ability of companies to absorb cost increases, and how much this will affect employment, inflation, and economic activity.

According to the president of the Employment and Labor Relations Council of the Federation of Commerce of São Paulo (FecomercioSP), José Pastore, commerce would be one of the sectors most affected by the reduction in working hours for two reasons. On the one hand, it is labor-intensive. On the other hand, many establishments operate seven days a week, or even 24 hours a day, such as pharmacies and supermarkets. “The increase in working hours hits the retail sector hard. That’s why we can’t just look at the average. The Brazilian reality is very diverse, and the impacts are very different,” said Pastore.

For him, the new, shorter working hours schedule would require adaptation on the part of companies, which would have four possible adjustments to make. The first would be to pass on the increased payroll cost to the prices of goods and services sold, which may be inevitable, given that many companies operate with narrow profit margins. The second mechanism would be to lay off employees with higher salaries and fill the vacancies with lower-paid workers, as a way to mitigate the increase in labor costs—which would increase turnover, a problem that typically causes training problems.

The third type of adjustment would be to invest in automation, replacing some employees with machinery. The result for the economy as a whole would be a reduction in job openings. Finally, given the increase in personnel costs, a fourth option would be to review the investment plan, which could lead to a contraction of businesses, slowing down economic activity and, in the worst case, leading to a recession. “There are four possible mechanisms. And the company might implement all four together. All of them are bad for the worker, especially the most vulnerable,” said Pastore.

Paulo Solmucci, president of the Brazilian Association of Bars and Restaurants (Abrasel), cited an estimated 20% increase in labor costs for companies in the sector, due to the introduction of two days off per week and the reduction in the weekly work schedule to 40 hours. This cost increase could not be offset by greater use of technology. The higher costs would then be passed on to the final prices for customers.

“The consumer wants the restaurant open for six days, just as they want the health center, the urban cleaning service. This means increasing the payroll by 20% to maintain service to the consumer, which results in 7% to 8% increases in price,” said Solmucci. “The consumer should ask: Does it fit their budget? Are you aware that you will pay more to have the same thing?”

A study by the National Confederation of Trade in Goods, Services and Tourism (CNC), released in February, estimates that reducing the work week to 40 hours could generate an extra cost of more than R$350 billion per year for commerce and service companies. According to the calculations, passing on part of this impact to consumers would lead to an average price increase of 13%. According to another study, published by the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), reducing the work week to 40 hours would increase labor costs by an average of 7.84% for companies. For IPEA researchers, an increase of this size is absorbable, as it is similar to that recorded in years of strong minimum wage adjustments, such as 2001, 2006, 2012, and 2024.

In the view of Congressman Reginaldo Lopes (Workers’ Party), author of one of the proposed amendments to the Constitution on the subject that are being discussed in the Chamber of Deputies, the impacts may be different depending on the sector, but if there is a four-year transition to the proposed reduction in weekly working schedule, the impact can be absorbed: “[It] is possible for medium and large companies. I recognize that, for a very small company, with two or three employees, the new 5×2 schedule may have a greater impact.”

For the economist and professor Naercio Menezes Filho, holder of the Ruth Cardoso Chair at Insper, it is necessary to consider particularities: “There will be specific situations in which it will be difficult for small companies to bear [the increase in costs], if there is no increase in productivity. Therefore, everything has to be done calmly.”

*By Carolina Nalin, O Globo — Doha

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/