Posts

Analysts highlight tensions in climate, human rights, and geopolitics, but more aligned if Kamala Harris wins

11/05/2024


The outcome of Tuesday’s U.S. elections could pressure the convergence of the U.S.-Brazil agenda and the stability of bilateral relations. Experts consulted by Valor suggest that much of the economic ties’ robustness is likely to remain, regardless of the winner. Still, risks of discord in areas like climate, human rights, and geopolitics may increase.

The U.S. is the top investor in Brazil. Commercial engagement is also growing, with Brazilian exports to the U.S. hitting a record this year, helping reduce Brazil’s trade deficit with the U.S.

Beyond the economic sphere, relations between the countries, currently led by presidents Biden and Lula, converge on cross-cutting issues like climate but are not free of disagreements.

“Bilateral relations have reached a stage of maturity under the Biden-Lula agenda, converging on topics like the environment and human rights, particularly concerning decent work, with initiatives from the United Nations and the International Labor Organization (ILO) to regulate app-based activities,” said Cristina Pecequilo, an international relations professor at the Federal University of São Paulo.

“The larger issue remains in the geopolitical arena. As Brazil returns to a more neutral, independent foreign policy, reviving classic international agenda principles, not just in bilateral relations, a series of discrepancies arise from the fact that the U.S. would rather see Brazil supporting its policies more directly and not diverge, for instance, on conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Palestine.”

Besides that, she added, is the weight of the growing Brazil-China relationship within BRICS, the very Brazil-U.S. relationship, and the upholding of reforms in the international order, which conflict with U.S. interests.

If Ms. Harris wins, she noted, continuity in proximity on cross-cutting issues is expected until the end of President Lula’s term, with divergence on some geopolitical matters.

Under a Trump administration, there could be greater economic protectionism and increased pressure for Brazil not to deepen ties with China amid the China-U.S. tensions.

“A Trump victory might also embolden far-right forces to feel more represented in exerting pressure. Thus, a Trump administration would certainly make it harder for Brazil to navigate these cross-cutting agendas.”

Bruna Santos, head of the Brazil Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington, said there is an overlap of agendas and quite similar views for the first time in U.S.-Brazil relations.

“Both current presidents are over 70 and became presidents after well-established political careers, confronting right-wing leaders with similar characteristics, such as [Jair] Bolsonaro and [Donald] Trump, and both had election results challenged by public demonstrations on January 8 [2023] and January 6 [2021],” she said.

“Moreover, there is a shared labor agenda involving unions, a central point of their meeting in February 2023, with both looking at energy transition as a path for economic development. This is unique.”

Ms. Santos noted that Brazil and Latin America as a whole aren’t a priority for any White House candidates, but the Brazil-U.S. relationship today is solid. “They are good friends, good companions, good partners. They aren’t allies in foreign policy, but they have a very consolidated relationship,” she said.

“The fact that Brazil considers the U.S. its second-largest trade partner [after China] is highly significant, as is the level of American direct investment in the country. It’s a bilateral relationship based on high-value-added products, which is also very important for Brazil.”

The U.S. remains the largest investor in Brazil. American foreign direct investment (FDI) stock rose from $123.9 billion in 2020 to $190.8 billion in 2021 and $228.8 billion in 2023, the highest level since at least 2010, according to the Central Bank’s official records. This is over four times the direct investment stock from Spain, the second-ranking country.

Data from the American Chamber of Commerce for Brazil (AmCham Brazil) show that the U.S. share in Brazil’s FDI increased from 11.8% in 2015 to 21% in 2019 and 25.8% in 2023.

In recent years, trade in goods and services between the two countries has grown, with intensified investment flows, especially in sectors like technology and the green economy, said Abrão Neto, CEO of AmCham.

“We expect the positive trajectory in trade and bilateral investments will continue. The U.S. is the main destination for Brazilian exports of industrial goods and high-tech products like aircraft, machinery, and equipment,” he said.

“Additionally, we’re watching a new cycle of American investments in Brazil in sectors like technology, data centers, and renewable energy. In 2023, U.S. companies announced 126 greenfield projects, the highest volume in a decade. Conditions are favorable for these results to intensify.”

From January to September this year, Brazilian exports to the U.S. grew 10.3% compared to the same period in 2023, reaching a record $29.4 billion, according to the Brazil-U.S. Trade Monitor by AmCham Brazil.

In recent years, increased shipments to the U.S. have significantly reduced Brazil’s trade deficit with the U.S., which fell to $1 billion in 2022 from $13.9 billion in 2021.

He noted that there are presidential elections in Brazil or the U.S. every two years, a cycle of political changes that is anticipated.

“In general, governments and businesses in both countries handle these transitions well. Behind political cycles, there are consolidated, long-term economic interests,” he said. “Moreover, Brazil and the U.S. have institutional maturity and strong incentives to maintain this cooperation.”

He added that the current Democratic government’s emphasis on sustainability and climate would undergo significant change under a potential Republican administration, but recently adopted policies like the Inflation Reduction Act and the Chips Act have bipartisan support, indicating continuity regardless of this Tuesday’s election outcome.

The same applies to the importance placed on the U.S. geopolitical rivalry with China and supply chain resilience, topics that are likely to remain priorities on the American political agenda.

“For Brazil, the ideal is to seek balance, defending its interests and maintaining partnerships with both countries. But [this] will increasingly be like walking a tightrope,” added Abrão Neto.

*By Marsílea Gombata — São Paulo

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Entrepreneurs, government officials, and sector experts review business opportunities between Brazil and the U.S.

05/16/2024


Gabriel Galípolo, the Brazilian Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Director, alongside former Fed members James Bullard and Kevin Warsh — Foto: Vanessa Carvalho/Valor

Gabriel Galípolo, the Brazilian Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Director, alongside former Fed members James Bullard and Kevin Warsh — Foto: Vanessa Carvalho/Valor

Two significant events in the United States later this year—the potential start of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate cut cycle and the U.S. presidential elections—will shape the economic policy options of the Lula administration in the coming months. This topic was a key focus at the Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-USA held on Wednesday (16). The event, which took place at The Plaza Hotel in New York, gathered Brazilian and American businesspeople, government officials, and sector experts to discuss the challenges and main business opportunities between the two countries. It also marked the start of a series of activities celebrating Valor’s 25th anniversary, set to conclude in May next year. One goal of these events is to intensify international debates and deepen understanding of Brazilian realities and business prospects.

Frederic Kachar, the general director of Editora Globo and the Globo Radio System, commented, “We are an economy with one of the five largest trade balances in the world and a monetary policy committed to fighting inflation. However, we still face issues with the exchange rate. We have a clean energy mix, which truly sets us apart from the rest of the world, yet we are not a priority for investment, even by the United States.” He noted that the Brazilian economy has many attributes and differentials that should be more appreciated both domestically and internationally. The event’s eight panels explored ways these could be leveraged for sustainable growth.

On the fiscal side, the need to control spending was emphasized, as stated by Dario Durigan, the executive secretary of the Ministry of Finance. He noted that, alongside initiatives already underway since last year to restore revenues, further efforts to contain spending are necessary. However, Secretary Durigan cautioned that this must be balanced to avoid exacerbating political polarization in the country.

In terms of monetary policy, Gabriel Galípolo, the Central Bank’s monetary policy director, indicated a move towards greater cohesion and a more conservative strategy in response to the worsening inflationary scenario following a contentious vote in the Monetary Policy Committee (COPOM) that stirred market unease.

Additionally, the government faces challenges in mobilizing resources for emergency relief and rebuilding infrastructure in Rio Grande do Sul, which was severely damaged by heavy rains—an extreme weather event expected to become more frequent. This concern was echoed by many participants at the event, who emphasized the necessity of aid for the state.

“The need for aid in rebuilding, considering this new reality, is crucial,” stated Ilan Goldfajn, president of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), which is collaborating with the government on a R$5.5 billion rescue package for the state. “Countries must adapt and prepare to face what is coming.”

The anticipated start of the Federal Reserve’s monetary easing process continues to be delayed, contributing to rising international interest rates due to the increased need for the U.S. Treasury to finance its public deficit. This situation constrains the availability of capital for emerging economies. Kevin Warsh, a former Fed member and potential future head of the institution, stated that if Donald Trump wins the presidential elections again, “I don’t think there will be an interest rate cut until December, and I think that’s the right decision. I don’t see how the Federal Reserve could make cuts before that.”

The upcoming U.S. elections are expected to exacerbate political polarization, which could have similar effects globally and might lead to heightened protectionist measures within a divided geopolitical landscape. “Isolationism is present in both parties,” remarked Scott Jennings, a Republican Party strategist. “There is a multi-party isolationist movement.”

The ongoing political polarization further complicates achieving consensus on addressing the U.S. public deficit, which is increasingly necessary given the rise in public debt since the 2008 financial crisis and the likelihood of the Fed maintaining higher interest rates for a prolonged period. Mr. Warsh criticized the fiscal expansion under the Biden administration and the Fed’s initial misjudgment of inflation as temporary, stating, “The bigger the inflation problem, the more regressive the tax on the poor in the United States and around the world. The United States has an obligation to have responsible fiscal and monetary policies.”

Following a divided vote last week, Gabriel Galípolo, speaking publicly at the Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-USA for the first time since the vote, aimed to demonstrate a unified approach to monetary policy that might entail less easing than previously anticipated. He referenced a statement by Central Bank President Roberto Campos, emphasizing the importance of not debating but instead pursuing the target. “Discussing the pursuit of the target is a forbidden discussion for a Central Bank director. You don’t discuss the target. The target is pursued.”

Mr. Galípolo elaborated on last week’s COPOM meeting debate, which focused on whether to proceed with a signaled 50-basis-point cut in interest rates. New directors like himself argued for adhering to the signaled cuts to establish credibility with the market. “It’s up to the Central Bank’s directors to set interest rates at a sufficiently restrictive level for as long as it takes to meet the target,” he stated. He also mentioned considering a 20-bp drop and supported the majority’s technical argument for this decision.

The Summit Valor Econômico Brazil-USA, held with master sponsorship from Gulf and JBS and additional sponsorship from Gerdau, JHSF, Cedae, Copel, and Aegea, was supported by multiple government entities and featured Latam and Delta Airlines as the official carriers. The event was organized by Valor Econômico.

*Por Alex Ribeiro — New York

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/