Posts

The antitrust watchdog allows Petrobras to negotiate new pipelines and sets new conditions for the state-owned enterprise

05/23/2024


With the antitrust watchdog’s latest decision, Petrobras will retain ownership of some refineries it was initially required to divest, including Repar, in the state of Paraná — Foto: Divulgação

With the antitrust watchdog’s latest decision, Petrobras will retain ownership of some refineries it was initially required to divest, including Repar, in the state of Paraná — Foto: Divulgação

Petrobras has successfully renegotiated the terms of its 2019 agreements with the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), the antitrust regulator. The agreements were initially established to suspend investigations into Petrobras’s dominance in the refining and gas markets. With the new arrangement, approved by CADE’s tribunal on Wednesday, Petrobras is no longer obligated to divest five of its refineries and the Transportadora Brasileira Gasoduto Bolívia-Brasil (TBG).

Under the revised terms, Petrobras faces new responsibilities. Notably, CADE will oversee the methodology used to set oil prices at refineries for the next three years and renewable energy pricing for an additional three years. In the gas sector, although Petrobras will maintain its investment in TBG, it will relinquish operational control, as the pipeline operator is to appoint independent members to its board of directors.

Should Petrobras fail to comply with these stipulations, CADE retains the authority to reopen investigations. Any findings of misconduct could result in penalties for Petrobras, including fines and mandatory changes to its business practices. Existing inquiries into allegations of price discrimination will be on hold throughout this monitoring period.

This agreement, the result of months of negotiations with CADE, coincides with a leadership transition at the state-owned company. Magda Chambriard, recently endorsed by the company’s eligibility committee, is set to assume the presidency with a directive to augment Petrobras’s refining operations.

The initiative to revisit these agreements began under the leadership of Jean Paul Prates in 2023. The company communicated to its board that the mandated divestments conflicted with its strategic objectives, a plan originally put into place during the Bolsonaro administration.

Following the new agreement, Petrobras has proceeded with the sale of three refineries: Six (Pará), Reman (Maranhão), and Rlam (Bahia). However, with CADE’s latest decision, the company will retain ownership of the other refineries it was initially required to divest: Repar (Paraná), Refap (Rio Grande do Sul), Rnest (Pernambuco), Regap (Minas Gerais), and Lubnor (Ceará).

As part of the commitments negotiated with CADE, Petrobras will also make public its general commercial policies for oil deliveries to ensure non-discriminatory practices. It will offer a specific type of contract, known as a Frame agreement, to any independent refinery on Brazilian soil concerning oil supply. Additionally, Petrobras is required to provide easy access to confidential data to facilitate ongoing monitoring by the antitrust watchdog.

During the session, CADE’s president, Alexandre Cordeiro, emphasized that the proposed consent decree for refining will not only bolster the transparency of Petrobras’s operations but also enhance CADE’s ability to access complex information, thus improving oversight.

He also noted that the proposal includes a robust monitoring mechanism that enables CADE to promptly verify Petrobras’s compliance with competition rules and respond swiftly to any discriminatory practices. Other board members echoed the significance of this structure, which aligns with the technical opinion provided by CADE’s General Superintendence.

Board member Camila Cabral Pires Alves emphasized the critical nature of monitoring the commitments outlined in the consent decree to ensure the effectiveness of the negotiated remedies. Meanwhile, board member Gustavo Augusto clarified that the consent decree aimed to foster the entry of new economic players into the refining market, rather than privatizing the refineries. “We are focused on maintaining the goals and making a technical correction in how these goals will be achieved,” he noted, adding that repurchasing assets that had been divested would not be appropriate.

Board member Diogo Thomson reported that the gas consent decree had been largely fulfilled, and the adjustment made—removing political control over TBG—was enabled by subsequent legislation. This change allows the state-owned company to continue its investments in vital infrastructure and further opens up the market.

In a notice to the market, Petrobras noted that the appendix to the refining consent decree emerged from “extensive debate” with CADE. The company explained that it was unable to sell the remaining refineries, necessitating a revision of its strategic plan.

Petrobras detailed that the frame agreement model sets foundational terms for negotiating oil volumes on a cargo-by-cargo basis. It specifies that the obligation to buy and sell will only be established if both parties reach an agreement on pricing, ensuring alignment with the prevailing market conditions at the time each deal is finalized.

Regarding natural gas, the company noted that the New Gas Act, enacted after the 2019 agreement, provides an exemption from de-verticalization for companies that were already vertically integrated. This exemption is contingent upon these companies adhering to independence and autonomy requirements, which are to be regulated by the National Petroleum Agency (ANP). Consequently, specific obligations have been negotiated to ensure the operational independence of TBG.

However, lawyer Thiago Silva, a partner at Vieira Rezende Advogados, argues that under the New Gas Act, de-verticalization remains a legal imperative that must be addressed eventually. There is a two-year window for the ANP to publish the relevant resolution on this matter. “The exemption does not permit permanent vertical integration but rather provides a timeframe for compliance, which has not yet commenced,” he explained. Mr. Silva also pointed out that distributors currently face scrutiny over plans that appear similar to transportation projects and are under pressure to regularize their operations.

*Por Beatriz Olivon, Fábio Couto — Brasília and Rio de Janeiro

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
Antitrust watchdog CADE says acquisition of assets is not simple, requires more time for analysis

02/01/2024


The approval—or not—of the acquisition of Marfrig’s beef assets by Minerva Foods should take longer than the companies had previously expected. The companies submitted the deal to the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) on September 27, 2023, when an obstacle to approval was the incomplete composition of the tribunal. But even after the appointment and installation of four new members, the antitrust regulator’s General Superintendence (SG) considered the operation was not simple and, therefore, required more time study it.

The deal includes the acquisition of part of Marfrig Global Foods and Marfrig Chile’s beef and sheep business, encompassing slaughtering and deboning plants, plus a distribution center. The assets are located in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile.

The deal doesn’t mean Marfrig’s exit from the animal slaughtering segment, as the company will maintain other plants. Both companies told CADE that, for Marfrig, the deal is in line with the strategy of focusing on the production of branded meat and high value-added products. As for Minerva, the acquisition is “a strategic opportunity to complement its operations,” with a focus on savings through scale and efficiency gains.

When the companies announced the R$7.5 billion deal to the antitrust watchdog, they described it as a summarized concentration act, a format intended for operations that are considered to be simple, whose deadline in this case is 30 days. As the General Superintendence turned it into an ordinary act, the process can take up to 240 days. In addition, the new deadline considers January 22nd as the starting date, when the General Superintendence asked the companies for new information regarding the operation.

The 240-day period is set out in the legislation. When contacted, CADE explained that the General Superintendence usually works within a 90-day deadline, a shorter period it tries to meet. Still, it is much longer than what Minerva and Marfrig expected when they submitted the deal.

In an order released in December, the General Superintendence said, given that in at least one of the markets involved in the operation (cattle slaughter in Rondônia), the deal could give Minerva a dominant position (with a market share exceeding 20%), it’s not possible to classify it as a summarized procedure.

Additional evidence was also requested. Only after that will the superintendence release an opinion on the case.

Based on the decision, if the deal is approved without restrictions, there will be a 15-day period for third parties or members to question the opinion and then move the deal to CADE’s tribunal. If the superintendence rejects or approves it with restrictions, the case will necessarily be submitted to the tribunal. If the superintendence approves it and there are no manifestations within 15 days, the deal will receive final approval.

The Brazilian Agriculture Confederation (CNA) requested to participate as a third party interested in the process. The entity says it intends to ensure that ranchers established in the areas of meatpacking plants will not be harmed from market power in the future.

CNA said it sent the antitrust watchdog a technical note in which describing the impacts of market concentration in recent years in the sector. According to CNA, the acquisition of Marfrig’s meatpacking operations by Minerva could increase market concentration in some states.

Last week, more than 100 letters were sent by CADE to members of markets that could be affected by the deal. The markets in question involve the sale of fresh beef and lamb in the domestic market; cattle slaughter and its by-products in the domestic market, rawhide in the domestic market; and beef processing activities.

Marfrig and Minerva declined to comment.

*Por Beatriz Olivon — Brasília

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/

Association of service providers complains at CADE, Anatel against Telefônica, TIM, Claro about sale of Oi Móvel, at CADE, Anatel

07/26/2022


The Brazilian Association of Competitive Telecommunications Service Providers (TelComp) will file this week a formal complaint with antitrust regulator CADE and telecoms regulator Anatel against Telefónica’s subsidiary in Brazil (Telefônica Brasil, owner of Vivo), Telecom Italia’s TIM, and América Móvil’s Claro about the sale of Oi Móvel.

Telefônica, TIM, and Claro appealed to the courts this month because they disagreed with the values imposed by Anatel for the offer of wholesale products to competitors. For data traffic, the regulator stipulated R$2.6 per gigabyte (GB). But the telcos’ proposals range from R$16 to R$48 per GB.

These offers are the compensation that the regulators imposed on the three telcos to give their approval to Oi Móvel’s purchase. They are remedies, or conditional measures, to ensure competition in the market with the elimination of a competitor.

The incumbents decided to challenge the prices in the approval phase. They asked Anatel to reexamine the case. In court, they obtained injunctions that suspended the obligation to submit offers.

TelComp “condemns the attitude of operators with significant market power that, before the closing of the acquisition of control of Oi Móvel, made a public commitment to society to fully comply with the remedies imposed by Anatel and CADE promptly.”

The entity will ask the courts for its inclusion in the case as a third interested party, Luiz Henrique Barbosa, head of TelComp, told Valor. Claro’s case is in the 1st Federal Civil Court of the Judiciary Section of the Federal District (Brasília); those of Vivo and TIM are in secrecy.

Mr. Barbosa pointed out that the telcos’ retail price is at R$2.8 per GB. “The price Anatel has set is not detached from reality, nor is it a subsidy to competitors. It is not below cost. If they [the three telcos] say this, it is because they are practicing predatory pricing.”

Anatel and CADE officials are studying measures, including undoing the sale if the telcos do not accept the fixed prices. “If it is not possible to undo the operation, they can be fined,” said Mr. Barbosa.

*By Ivone Santana — São Paulo