What is Gross Domestic Product, and what does it measure?

The Brazilian economy is expected to have closed 2021 at a faster pace in November and December, offsetting the weak performance in October. In the year, GDP growth is expected to have reached 4.5%, after the 3.9% drop with the pandemic in 2020.

For this year, expectations still tend to shape in the coming days depending on the evolution and consequences of the war waged by Russia against Ukraine. One reading is that the pattern of last year will be repeated in Brazil: growth concentrated in the first quarter, but with the GDP ending the year much weaker. Another reading, which can take shape, is that the conflict will undermine the drive expected for activity at the beginning of the year.

A survey by Valor with 67 financial and consultancy firms shows a median projection of 0.2% GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to the immediately previous three months, seasonally adjusted. In the second and third quarters, there were drops by 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively.

On the supply side, agriculture is expected to grow 6.1% from October to December 2021, but the sector has seen significant declines in previous quarters, explained by adverse weather events and harvest losses, which will still make the agriculture GDP fall 0.2% in the year, analysts estimate.

Industry even managed to grow in December, but it is unlikely to be enough to prevent a 1.5% contraction in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to the third quarter, according to estimates. The industry suffered throughout the year with bottlenecks in global production chains. Still, after contracting 3.4% in 2020, it is expected to increase by 4.4% in 2021.

More sustained growth, however, must come from services. While the sector may slow down from a 1.1% rise in the third quarter to a 0.2% rise in the fourth, according to projections, it would end 2021 up 4.6%, after a drop of 4.3% in the previous year. “A good part of this fourth quarter result is supported by services, which should still follow in pace of recovery with vaccination. But for the rest, it’s an very weak picture,” said Marcos Ross, chief economist at Haitong. He sees GDP up 0.3% in the fourth quarter of 2021.

On demand side, in the last three months of 2021, only government consumption (up 0.4% from the third quarter) and imports (1.8%) are seen as not contracting. Gross fixed capital formation (GFCF, a measure of investment) is expected to fall 0.1%, while household consumption is expected to drop 0.1%, and exports to decline 2.7%. In 2021 as a whole, however, investments are expected to rise 16.6% after falling by 0.5% in 2020, while household consumption is expected to rise 3.4%, only partially recovering the 5.4% loss in the previous year.

Like Mr. Leal, Flávio Serrano, chief economist at Greenbay Investimentos, says that activity indicators in the fourth quarter reinforce the idea of exhaustion of fiscal stimuli that helped to avoid even greater losses in 2020. He sees, however, the possibility of a 0.1% contraction of GDP between October and December 2021, compared to the previous three months.

Depending on the GDP result for the fourth quarter, the change in growth forecast for last year as a whole would just be “a fine adjustment”, says Mr. Ross, with Haitong. “The things is to determine whether the growth was 4.5% or 4.6%. It even looked worse, which would be below 4.5%, but the November and December data show that perhaps it was not. But if you think about a broader discussion, it doesn’t make much difference.”

The end of 2021 is likely to leave a “statistical carryover” of 0.1% for 2022, a number that has already been negative in the economist’s accounts. “It’s a detail for the better, but it shows that there’s a growth problem yet to be solved,” says Mr. Ross. Although the December numbers have “a kind of positive feeling,” this is not a perception likely to be sustained in 2022, according to him.

The consequences of the war may prove to be a problem for Brazil, due to the potential pressure on energy and grain prices. And even though Brazil’s trade relations with Russia and Ukraine are limited, the conflict tends to weaken the pace of the economies of several countries more dependent on trade with the Russians – which would also have a secondary effect on activity in Brazil.

In addition to the potential damage of the war, 2022 had already begun under the effect of the triggering of contaminations by the omicron variant. But José Pena, chief economist of Porto Seguro Investimentos, believes that although January may have lost a little steam because of the pandemic outbreak, it was not to the point of having compromised the activity. Mr. Pena projects a GDP close to stability in the period and says he is cautious about the rest of the year.

The survey carried by Valor points to a median growth of 0.3% for the 2022 GDP. Mr. Ross projects a 0.1% rise from January to March, compared to the fourth quarter of 2021, and sees a contraction of 0.4% in the Brazilian activity this year. The effects of the monetary tightening throughout 2021 will be more evident in activity in 2022 and are expected to be boosted by high indebtedness and lower credit supply, points out Mr. Serrano, with Greenbay, who also foresees a 0.5% drop in GDP in this year.

Mr. Leal projects a 0.3% increase in GDP in the first quarter of this year, with seasonal adjustment. The same variation is estimated for the activity in 2022. But he recalls that projections for this year still do not consider possible effects of the war between Russia and Ukraine. It is still uncertain, for example, how long agricultural commodities and oil prices can stay higher, which affects global and domestic inflation. This scenario, accompanied by a devalued exchange rate due to risk aversion, can lead to a higher interest rate than expected for the year, he notes, which would further restrict activity.

Mr. Leal says he believes the peak impact of the current monetary tightening cycle on the economy is likely to happen between the second and third quarters of this year. “The question mark is the repercussion of this for the 2023 economy.”

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

Embraer engata rota ascendente após rejeição pela Boeing

Although the war in Ukraine has not affected the flights of Brazilian companies so far, planemaker Embraer and airlines Latam, Gol and Azul are closely monitoring its developments, which may have a significant impact on costs and operations in the sector.

In the case of Embraer, the international community’s sanctions against Russia may disrupt access to titanium, a light metal used to make aircraft and their engines.

VSMPO-Avisma, controlled by the state-owned Rostec, has a monopoly on the production of titanium and parts forged with the metal in Russia. And it is an important supplier to the aircraft industry. Boeing and Airbus also depend in good part on Russian titanium.

An embargo on Russia, therefore, could directly impact the largest planemakers in the world.

According to Reuters, VSMPO-Avisma accounts for 25% of global titanium supply. Specifically in the aircraft market, this share rises to 50%, according to international consultants.

Sought for comment, Embraer said it evaluates the titanium supply chain on an ongoing basis, as it does with other materials. “At this moment, the supply of titanium does not concern Embraer, since the company holds a high level of stock of this material,” the company said in a note.

In a LinkedIn post last week, Latam Brasil CEO Jerome Cadier listed potential impacts of the war for airlines and stressed that the pressure on costs is “undeniable,” also citing titanium. “Unfortunately, in the situation the industry is in, these increases will impact ticket prices. It is a shame, especially at a time when what we most want is to fly again,” he wrote.

In the executive’s view, the war in Ukraine can affect the capital market and the availability of credit and the price and supply of commodities relevant to the industry, including metal.

Sought to comment on the consequences of the war, Latam said it does not fly to Ukraine and, so far, its flights have not been affected by the closure of airspace in different countries.

Gol also reported that it does not operate flights to Ukraine and reinforced recent positioning of the Brazilian Association of Airline Companies (Abear), which already warned about potential impacts of the exchange rate and oil on the costs of the airline industry.

“About this sad moment, we inform that our members do not operate flights that have as final destination the conflict region and we follow closely the impacts on the foreign exchange rate and oil prices, which can further increase costs,” the association reported.

Azul said in a note that “its operations continue as normal and without any impact.” “A possible effect on the value of tickets will depend on the impact of the war on costs such as foreign exchange rate or oil, which are constantly monitored by the company,” it added.

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com

Economists and banks, however, warn that it depends on the duration of the conflict

Brazilian economy: encouraging news from the IMF - Europartner

The Brazilian economy is little exposed to the Russia-Ukraine war and is likely to suffer little impact, at least for now. This scenario, however, will only be confirmed if the conflict does not spread to other European countries, economists and banks told Valor.

For the head of economic research in Latin America at Goldman Sachs, Alberto Ramos, the fastest impact will be seen in inflation via commodities, and not in growth. “The first quarter will still be very much influenced by the omicron dynamics, which affected activity in January and there was a small rebound in February,” he said.

“Potentially, the implication [of the Russia-Ukraine conflict] will be to backfire a bit on the inflationary process and make the Central Bank more conservative because of the impact on commodity prices,” he added.

“Brazil’s trade levels with Russia and Ukraine are quite limited. The supply of fertilizer for the agribusiness can be impacted by this channel and put more pressure on food prices and energy prices with oil above $100. It means more pressure on Petrobras. But the impact, I say it again, is more immediate on inflation than on growth. We are already in March, there is not much more to go for the first quarter,” says Mr. Ramos.

A report by Dutch bank Rabobank goes in the same vein. The economists at the financial firm note that with the exception of the fertilizer market, Brazil is little exposed to Russian supply or demand and believe that the military attack should only indirectly weigh on Brazilian activity.

The report entitled “A Russian cloud over Brazil,” says that everything depends on the duration of the conflict. The side effects of the war, says the bank, may come from energy prices and uncontrolled imported inflation, and the likelihood of higher interest rates.

With high inflation, Rabobank projects a Selic rate of up to 12.25% in the second quarter of this year, with a slowdown to 11.75% by the end of the year. But it warns that a prolonged conflict may delay the easing cycle.

In the evaluation of the chief economist of RPS Capital, Gabriel Leal de Barros, the prospect of increased public spending in Brazil, because of the elections, may end up offsetting the negative effect coming from the war in Russia. He recalls that states and municipalities have about R$180 billion in cash today, equivalent to 2% of GDP. “Some states are already spending more, giving salary raises for civil servants, and this move acts as a counterweight to the negative effect of the war on activity,” he said.

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com