{"id":96978,"date":"2025-12-18T20:24:09","date_gmt":"2025-12-18T23:24:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/?p=96978"},"modified":"2025-12-18T20:24:09","modified_gmt":"2025-12-18T23:24:09","slug":"supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
Six justices have already found temporal milestone thesis unconstitutional; trial set to end today<\/strong><\/em><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

12\/18\/2025\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n

A majority of justices of Brazil\u2019s\u00a0Supreme Court\u00a0<\/strong>have voted to strike down provisions of the so-called temporal milestone law on the demarcation of Indigenous lands, which states that tribes would only be entitled to lands they occupied or that were under dispute on the date the Constitution was enacted: October 5, 1988.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The majority was secured with the vote of Justice\u00a0Alexandre de Moraes<\/strong>, who sided with the rapporteur, Justice\u00a0Gilmar Mendes<\/strong>. He was also joined, with some specific reservations, by justices\u00a0Fl\u00e1vio Dino, Cristiano Zanin, Luiz Fux<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0Dias Toffoli<\/strong>. Still to vote are Justices\u00a0C\u00e1rmen L\u00facia, Kassio Nunes Marques, Andr\u00e9 Mendon\u00e7a<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0Edson Fachin<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The case is being heard in the court\u2019s virtual plenary and is scheduled to conclude at 11:59 p.m. on Thursday (18). Justices may still change their votes, request that the case be moved to an in-person session, or ask for more time to review the matter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Casting the final vote so far, Moraes reiterated the position he took in the 2023 ruling, when he was one of nine justices who voted to overturn the time-limit doctrine. At the time, he said the date of the Constitution\u2019s enactment should be seen as an \u201cx-ray plate\u201d of territorial occupation to strike a balance between the rights of Indigenous peoples and private property.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Moraes also agreed with Mendes\u2019s argument that Congress cannot enact legislation contrary to the Supreme Court\u2019s interpretation, but only regulate demarcation procedures. Like Dino, Moraes said this understanding could not be changed even through the approval of a proposed constitutional amendment (PEC).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cThe fundamental nature of the right at issue, which elevates the matter to the status of an entrenchment clause, part of the Constitution\u2019s rigid and immutable core, would prevent any attempt to alter this understanding through a constitutional amendment, since adopting the time limit would amount to distorting Article 231 of the Constitution and violating the principle prohibiting social regression,\u201d Moraes said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The ruling comes after the Senate last week approved a PEC seeking to reinstate the so-called temporal doctrine. The proposal had been shelved pending a decision by the Supreme Court,\u00a0but was rushed through as a reaction<\/a>\u00a0to a decision by Justice Mendes that\u00a0tightened rules for the impeachment of Supreme Court justices<\/a>. The amendment still needs to be approved by the Chamber of Deputies, which is not expected to happen this year.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Toffoli also sided with the court\u2019s most senior justice, but added reservations to ensure that good-faith improvements made by non-Indigenous occupants can be compensated until the demarcation process is concluded. He also said existing rules governing the role of anthropologists, experts, and other specialists in demarcation proceedings are sufficient.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In addition, he voted to reject compensation claims based on administrative documents without valid legal titles and, regarding state omission, stressed that conciliation is possible at any stage of the dispute and that review is part of the demarcation process.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Mendes\u2019s vote opened the trial on Monday (15). He said the time-limit doctrine represents \u201ca situation that is difficult to prove for Indigenous communities that were historically dehumanized through state or private practices of forced removal, killings and persecution.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

He also acknowledged a historical failure by the Brazilian state to conclude demarcation processes and set a 10-year deadline for the federal government to complete pending procedures.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Mendes further voted to allow Indigenous territories to be used for economic purposes, provided that the benefits accrue to the entire community and land possession is preserved.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Finally, he found unconstitutional the ban on expanding the boundaries of already demarcated Indigenous lands, arguing that the Constitution guarantees the correction of administrative acts with \u201cserious and irremediable\u201d errors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In 2023, the Supreme Court struck down the time-limit doctrine by a 9-2 vote<\/a>. In response, Congress passed a bill validating the doctrine. As a result, different parties and organizations took the matter to the Supreme Court, some seeking to uphold the law and others calling for it to be overturned.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The cases were assigned to Mendes, who set up a conciliation panel among the parties to seek consensus. In June 2025, the commission presented an agreement signed by the federal government, Congress, Indigenous peoples, and farmers, after 23 hearings held by the group.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"Prior
Prior Supreme Court trial of the temporal milestone thesis in 2023, when it was struck down for the first time \u2014 Photo: Carlos Moura\/SCO\/STF<\/em><\/p>\n

*By Giullia Colombo \u2014 Bras\u00edlia
\nSource: Valor International
\nhttps:\/\/valorinternational.globo.com\/<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Six justices have already found temporal milestone thesis unconstitutional; trial set to end today     12\/18\/2025\u00a0 A majority of justices of Brazil\u2019s\u00a0Supreme Court\u00a0have voted to strike down provisions of the so-called temporal milestone law on the demarcation of Indigenous lands, which states that tribes would only be entitled to lands they occupied or that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8106],"tags":[26662],"class_list":["post-96978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-murray-news","tag-supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims - Murray Advogados<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims - Murray Advogados\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Six justices have already found temporal milestone thesis unconstitutional; trial set to end today     12\/18\/2025\u00a0 A majority of justices of Brazil\u2019s\u00a0Supreme Court\u00a0have voted to strike down provisions of the so-called temporal milestone law on the demarcation of Indigenous lands, which states that tribes would only be entitled to lands they occupied or that […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Murray Advogados\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-18T23:24:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gelcy Bueno\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gelcy Bueno\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gelcy Bueno\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-18T23:24:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/\"},\"wordCount\":765,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Murray News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims - Murray Advogados\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-18T23:24:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"In\u00edcio\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/home\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Murray Advogados\",\"description\":\"PLG International Lawyers\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e\",\"name\":\"Gelcy Bueno\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gelcy Bueno\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/author\/news\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims - Murray Advogados","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims - Murray Advogados","og_description":"Six justices have already found temporal milestone thesis unconstitutional; trial set to end today     12\/18\/2025\u00a0 A majority of justices of Brazil\u2019s\u00a0Supreme Court\u00a0have voted to strike down provisions of the so-called temporal milestone law on the demarcation of Indigenous lands, which states that tribes would only be entitled to lands they occupied or that […]","og_url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/","og_site_name":"Murray Advogados","article_published_time":"2025-12-18T23:24:09+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Gelcy Bueno","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gelcy Bueno","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/"},"author":{"name":"Gelcy Bueno","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e"},"headline":"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims","datePublished":"2025-12-18T23:24:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/"},"wordCount":765,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg","keywords":["Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims"],"articleSection":["Murray News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/","url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/","name":"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims - Murray Advogados","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg","datePublished":"2025-12-18T23:24:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/s2-valorinternational.glbimg.com\/_C4ZeMunMAqUsO9r8QNgCYWiMAk=\/0x0:2048x1365\/984x0\/smart\/filters:strip_icc()\/i.s3.glbimg.com\/v1\/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93\/internal_photos\/bs\/2023\/x\/d\/mEB25ZTqyKVbTjG0kBhw\/stf-marco.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-forms-majority-against-cutoff-for-indigenous-land-claims\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"In\u00edcio","item":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/home\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court forms majority against cutoff for Indigenous land claims"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/","name":"Murray Advogados","description":"PLG International Lawyers","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e","name":"Gelcy Bueno","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gelcy Bueno"},"url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/author\/news\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96978"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":96980,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96978\/revisions\/96980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}