{"id":95811,"date":"2025-09-19T11:31:38","date_gmt":"2025-09-19T14:31:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/?p=95811"},"modified":"2025-09-19T11:31:38","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T14:31:38","slug":"supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
By the decision, five cumulative criteria established by justices must be met to extend coverage beyond ANS list<\/strong><\/em><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

09\/19\/2025\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

The Federal Supreme Court (STF) has increased the number of criteria that must be met for health insurance plans to be required to cover treatments not included in the list of the National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Plans (ANS).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The ruling, concluded on Thursday (18) by majority vote, represents a victory for health plans, even though the request to strike down Law No. 14,454 of 2022 was denied. The law requires coverage for treatments outside the ANS list, but it previously only set two conditions. In the prevailing opinion, Justice Lu\u00eds Roberto Barroso added three more, bringing the total to five.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The provisions of the law had been challenged by the National Union of Self-Management Health Institutions (Unidas), which argued that the obligation was unconstitutional because it imposed broader duties on private companies than those binding on the State itself (ADI 7265).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The justices upheld the requirement for coverage of treatments outside the ANS list, provided all five conditions are cumulatively met: prescription by a qualified physician or dentist; no express denial by ANS or pending analysis of a list update; absence of an adequate therapeutic alternative for the patient\u2019s condition within the ANS list; proof of efficacy and safety of the treatment based on high-level scientific evidence; and registration with the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Court also ruled that, when reviewing lawsuits demanding coverage, judges must verify whether there is evidence of a prior request to the health plan with either a denial, unreasonable delay, or omission. In cases where courts order coverage, ANS must be notified to assess whether the treatment should be included in the mandatory list.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The decision establishes that the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff, though judges may shift this burden at their discretion under the Civil Procedure Code.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Most justices followed the opinion of Justice Barroso, who argued that the criteria are based on STF precedents in Themes 6 and 1234, which defined objective parameters for lawsuits demanding medicines from the public health system (SUS). He was joined by Justices Nunes Marques, Cristiano Zanin, Andr\u00e9 Mendon\u00e7a, Luiz Fux, Dias Toffoli, and Gilmar Mendes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Justice Mendes noted that the case involves about one-quarter of the Brazilian population, who rely on private health care. He argued that replicating the criteria already established for public health was necessary to avoid imbalance in the supplementary system, which could burden the SUS.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Justice Fl\u00e1vio Dino opened the dissent and was in the minority. Like Justice Barroso, he voted for the validity of the legal provision that the ANS list is the basic reference for plans. However, he argued there was no need for the Court to step into the role of Congress or the regulator. He maintained that the law already required observance of ANS\u2019s technical rules and that further requirements were unnecessary. His view was supported by Justices Edson Fachin, Alexandre de Moraes, and C\u00e1rmen L\u00facia.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The ruling was praised by Gustavo Ribeiro, president of the Brazilian Association of Health Plans (ABRAMGE), who said it \u201crestores Brazil to a global standard of legal certainty.\u201d He argued that the prior framework created significant instability for the sector and noted that, over the past three years, the industry faced a negative impact of R$25 billion due to fraud and lawsuits demanding coverage outside the ANS list.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

He expressed hope that the decision will eventually lower premiums.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Consumer advocates, however, see the ruling as a setback. Attorney Fernando Padilha, representing the Brazilian Association for the Protection of Health Plan Consumers (Sa\u00fade Brasil) in the case, said the decision \u201ccreates barriers to access and shifts major responsibility to patients, favoring only those who can afford strong legal representation.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

He warned that requiring patients and families to gather high-level scientific evidence would make the process costlier and more complex.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Attorney Marcos Patullo, partner at Vilhena Silva Advogados, also criticized the outcome, saying the new requirements will make coverage more bureaucratic and time-consuming. \u201cAlthough coverage outside the list remains possible, the cumulative demands will delay access and increase red tape,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

For Jos\u00e9 Luiz Toro, legal consultant of Unidas and president of the Brazilian Institute of Supplementary Health Law (IBDSS), the decision clarified the distinction between public and private health. \u201cIt is the State\u2019s duty to provide broad and universal health care. Expanding private coverage without predictability only drives up costs, pushing beneficiaries out of the private system and overburdening SUS,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Attorney Marcio Charcon Dainesi of Dainesi Advogados argued that the ANS list should be exhaustive. \u201cThere is no way to ensure coverage without predictability, and ANS is the body responsible for regulating this matter,\u201d he said. Still, he considered the ruling positive for both companies and consumers: \u201cWithout criteria, there is no certainty in treatments.\u201d<\/p>\n

*\u00a0By Beatriz Olivon, Valor\u00a0\u2014 Bras\u00edlia<\/p>\n

Source: Valor International<\/p>\n

https:\/\/valorinternational.globo.com\/<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By the decision, five cumulative criteria established by justices must be met to extend coverage beyond ANS list         09\/19\/2025\u00a0 The Federal Supreme Court (STF) has increased the number of criteria that must be met for health insurance plans to be required to cover treatments not included in the list of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8106],"tags":[26427,26428],"class_list":["post-95811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-murray-news","tag-supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan","tag-treatment-coverage"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage - Murray Advogados<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage - Murray Advogados\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By the decision, five cumulative criteria established by justices must be met to extend coverage beyond ANS list         09\/19\/2025\u00a0 The Federal Supreme Court (STF) has increased the number of criteria that must be met for health insurance plans to be required to cover treatments not included in the list of the […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Murray Advogados\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-19T14:31:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gelcy Bueno\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gelcy Bueno\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gelcy Bueno\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-19T14:31:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/\"},\"wordCount\":841,\"keywords\":[\"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan\",\"treatment coverage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Murray News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage - Murray Advogados\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-19T14:31:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"In\u00edcio\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/home\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Murray Advogados\",\"description\":\"PLG International Lawyers\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e\",\"name\":\"Gelcy Bueno\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gelcy Bueno\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/author\/news\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage - Murray Advogados","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage - Murray Advogados","og_description":"By the decision, five cumulative criteria established by justices must be met to extend coverage beyond ANS list         09\/19\/2025\u00a0 The Federal Supreme Court (STF) has increased the number of criteria that must be met for health insurance plans to be required to cover treatments not included in the list of the […]","og_url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/","og_site_name":"Murray Advogados","article_published_time":"2025-09-19T14:31:38+00:00","author":"Gelcy Bueno","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gelcy Bueno","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/"},"author":{"name":"Gelcy Bueno","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e"},"headline":"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage","datePublished":"2025-09-19T14:31:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/"},"wordCount":841,"keywords":["Supreme Court raises bar for health plan","treatment coverage"],"articleSection":["Murray News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/","url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/","name":"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage - Murray Advogados","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-09-19T14:31:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/supreme-court-raises-bar-for-health-plan-treatment-coverage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"In\u00edcio","item":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/home\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court raises bar for health plan treatment coverage"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/","name":"Murray Advogados","description":"PLG International Lawyers","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/dd0d0bea46c2436124555d18c1a0d52e","name":"Gelcy Bueno","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ef2acfe966d6deacdeccd2a24ea89192c41fd05fc60e57b79021358a47f5641?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gelcy Bueno"},"url":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/author\/news\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95811"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95811\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":95813,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95811\/revisions\/95813"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murray.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}