• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • English English English en
  • Português Português Portuguese (Brazil) pt-br
Murray Advogados
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Areas
    • More…
      • Probate and Family Law
      • Capital Stock
      • Internet & Electronic Trade
      • Life Sciences
      • Capital and Financial Market Banking Law
      • Media e Entertainment
      • Mining
      • Intellectual Property
      • Telecommunications Law and Policy
      • Visas
    • Arbitration
    • Adminstrative Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Civil Law
    • Trade Law
    • Consumer Law
    • Sports Law
    • Market and Antitrust Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law and Foreign Trade
    • Corporate Law
    • Labor Law
    • Tax Law
    • Power, Oil and Gas
  • Members
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Murray News

Government calculates combined rate of up to 27% with new tax regime

Estimates were made by Finance Ministry’s team and presented to Senate’s tax reform rapporteur

08/08/2023


Fernando Haddad — Foto: Rafa Neddermeyer/Agência Brasil

Fernando Haddad — Foto: Rafa Neddermeyer/Agência Brasil

Point of greatest doubt in the debates on the tax overhaul, the combined standard rates of the Contribution on Goods and Services (CBS) and the Tax on Goods and Services (IBS), to be created, should reach 25.45% to 27% — according to estimates prepared by the Finance Ministry and delivered on Tuesday to the rapporteur of the proposal in the Senate, Eduardo Braga. The same study shows that the preferential tax treatments approved by the Chamber of Deputies added 4.72 to 4.98 percentage points to the standard rate.

After meeting with Mr. Braga, Finance Minister Fernando Haddad said the study was the first to describe the tax overhaul in number. Others may be prepared, he added. He also said the “scenarios are very well designed” and present “very solid” estimates of tax rates.

Mr. Haddad said his team will act as the Senate’s “backstage” during the discussions. To win the 60 to 65 votes needed for approval, “you have to show what you’re doing,” he said.

Besides the minister, Mr. Braga said that the study will be the basis for discussing the benefits of the changes that will be proposed in the Senate. “The Ministry of Finance is delivering the study promptly,” he said. He also informed that it is expected to complete the work of analysis of the proposal in the Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ) in October.

The rates indicated in the study are not exact, nor are they definitive, government officials say. They were estimated in different scenarios, always considering that the level of collection will be maintained after the reform.

Thus, the sum of the revenues of the CBS, the IBS, and the excise tax will have to be at the same level observed in the five taxes that will be replaced: social taxes PIS and Cofins, the tax on industrialized products (IPI), the sales tax ICMS and the tax on services ISS. The target level is equivalent to 12.45% of the GDP.

However, the result of the overhaul will be positive, a source say. “We’re going to a better place,” this person added. In the worst-case scenario, the standard rate for the sum of IBS and CBS would be 27%. It would be lower than the current tax level, of up to 34.4%.

The official said that although the ICMS rate is 18%, in most cases this rate is charged on the price of the product – which includes other taxes. If it were calculated on the price of the products without taxes, as is the case with the IBS, the rate would be 24.2%. The same happens with PIS/Cofins: 9.25% compared to 10.2%. The sum of the taxes would be 27.25% now, compared to 34.4% before.

The study has two rates because it works with two scenarios that differ because of the “compliance gap.” The term describes revenue losses due to evasion, avoidance (using loopholes in the law to pay less), non-payment, and litigation.

In the scenario they call “feasible,” they estimate the gap at 10%. This is the level observed in Hungary, where the standard consumption tax rate is 27%, the highest one among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. In the “conservative” scenario, the gap is 15%.

How much the gap will decrease after the overhaul is one of the uncertainties that prevent a more precise calculation of the standard rate. There is a certainty in the Finance Ministry that the reduction will come due to the simplification of the system and the reduction of special regimes. The number of disputes is also expected to decrease. Today, the Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (Carf) is discussing a backlog of R$1.5 trillion.

The second point of uncertainty is the collection of the excise tax. It is not defined which products and services will pay this new tax. The international standard is to levy it on tobacco and alcoholic beverages, but in the case of Brazil, this will only be defined in law to be discussed after the approval of the constitutional amendment proposal PEC 45. The study assumes that only smoking and alcohol will be taxed and that current taxation will be maintained.

A third issue is the specific tax regimes that will be applied to fuels, banks, and real estate, among others. The simulations assume that the collection of the current model will be maintained, but the performance may be different.

Finally, the VAT rate will change according to the exceptions created to the general rule. The more products and services have a preferential tax treatment with lower taxation, the higher the standard rate to be applied in general.

If the original proposal of the government officials was maintained, in which the taxation on consumption would have no exceptions but the Simples Nacional (a simplified tax regime for small businesses) and the Free Zone (a duty-free area in Manaus, in the Amazon), the standard rate would be between 20.73% and 22.02%. The rate of 25.45% to 27% considers all the exemptions passed by the Chamber of Deputies, ranging from private schools to amusement parks. The text can be changed in the Senate.

The officials calculated the weight of the exceptions to the general rule. The most expensive is the reduced rate of 50% for agriculture and food basket, which adds from 1.67 to 1.79 percentage points to the standard rate. A 50% reduction for health services adds 0.62 to 0.63 percentage points to the standard rate. In the case of private education, the increase is 0.32 percentage points in both scenarios.

*Por Lu Aiko Otta, Estevão Taiar — Brasília

Source: Valor International

https://valorinternational.globo.com/
9 de August de 2023/by Gelcy Bueno
Tags: combined rate, new tax regime
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Pesquisa

Posts Recentes

  • Newsletter September 2023
  • Copasul invests R$1.4bn in its first soybean processing plant
  • Embraer’s KC-390 making headway in Europe
  • Federal government’s dividends fall 44%
  • Petrobras, Ibama seek plan B for Equatorial Margin

Arquivos

  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
© Copyright 2023 Murray Advogados – PLG International Lawyers - Support Webgui Design
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Multinational companies push for green hydrogen regulation in Brazil Brazil accuses Argentina of thwarting freedom of navigation on Paraná Rive...
Scroll to top